Skip to main content

Minimum Stair Width for Evacuation, Overtaking Movement and Counterflow — Technical Bases and Suggestions for the Past, Present and Future

  • Conference paper
Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2005

Abstract

Traditional lane models such as the 560 mm (22-in.) unit of exit width are examined as historical artifacts and, when studied empirically, as flawed bases for minimum stair width determination. Criticisms of this lane model were presented separately by the authors as early as about 1970 and improved bases for minimum width determination were also presented. Currently, even the improved bases for minimum stair width—based on the authors’ early work—need to be updated for stair user demographics and other factors that have changed in recent decades. Three types of crowd flow are considered; coherent flow, overtaking movement, and counterflow. All of these occurred in the evacuations of the World Trade Center in 1993 and 2001. Partly as a result of the latter incident, counterflow has recently received particular attention in some US standards and building code-change deliberations that led to a minor increase—from 1120 mm to 1422 mm (44 in. to 56 in.) in minimum, nominal exit stair width requirements for certain occupancy conditions. Completing an examination of past, current and future criteria for setting minimum stair width, the authors provide suggestions for studies that will help provide significantly improved bases for such widths in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. J. Fruin: Pedestrian Planning and Design, Metropolitan Association of Urban Designers and Environmental Planners, Inc., New York (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  2. B. Pushkarev and J. Zupan: Urban Space for Pedestrians, Regional Plan Association, MIT Press (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Pauls: Building Evacuation: Research Findings and Recommendations, In: D. Canter (Ed.) Fires and Human Behaviour, John Wiley and Sons, pp. 251–275 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. J. Pauls: Development of Knowledge about Means of Egress, Fire Technology, 20,2, pp. 28–40 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Design and Construction of Building Exits, National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, Gaithersburg, Maryland (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fire Grading of Buildings, Part III, Personal Safety, Post War Building Studies, No. 29, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Pauls: Movement of People, The SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, National Fire Protection Association, Quincy, MA, Section 1, Chapter 15, pp. 246–268 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Pauls: The Stair Event, 18-minute documentary film, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Pauls: The Stair Event: Some lessons for design, In: Proceedings of Conference, People and the Man-Made Environment, University of Sydney, Australia, pp. 99–109 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  10. W. Rhodes et al.: Studies of Stair Ecology in Public Assembly Facilities: Handrails, Speed, Density, Flow, Distribution and Foot Placement, Report for National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Panero and M. Zelnik: Human Dimension & Interior Space: A Source Book of Design reference Standards, Whitney Library of Design, New York (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Templer: The Staircase: Studies of Hazards, Falls, and Safer Design, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Roys and M. Wright: Minor Variations in Gait and their Effect on Stair Safety, Contemporary Ergonomics 2005, Taylor and Francis, pp. 427–431 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Wright and M. Roys: Effect of Changing Stair Dimensions on Safety, Contemporary Ergonomics 2005, Taylor and Francis 469–474 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. Pauls: The Movement of People in Buildings and Design Solutions for Means of Egress, Fire Technology, 201, pp. 27–47 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pauls, J.L., Fruin, J.J., Zupan, J.M. (2007). Minimum Stair Width for Evacuation, Overtaking Movement and Counterflow — Technical Bases and Suggestions for the Past, Present and Future. In: Waldau, N., Gattermann, P., Knoflacher, H., Schreckenberg, M. (eds) Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics 2005. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-47064-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics