Skip to main content

From CMMI to SPICE – Experiences on How to Survive a SPICE Assessment Having Already Implemented CMMI

  • Conference paper
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2008)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 5089))

Abstract

Dealing with multiple models for process assessment and improvement is a challenging, time-consuming task. In the automotive sector, for example, several suppliers drive their process improvement on the basis of CMMI®. However, many car manufacturers require process capability ratings determined on the basis of Automotive SPICETM. The approach presented aims at preparing organizations already working according to CMMI for Automotive SPICE assessments. The approach was already successfully applied in industrial settings and lessons learned are discussed. The approach helps to avoid misunderstandings during assessments due to different model taxonomy, achieve appropriate process ratings, and save both effort and costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE™ Process Assessment Model (PAM), RELEASE v2.3 (May 5, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Automotive SIG: Automotive SPICE™ Process Reference Model (PRM), RELEASE v4.3 (May 5, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dorling, A.: CMMi Mapping to ISO/IEC TR 15504-2:1998 (last visited February 3, 2008), http://www.isospice.com/articles/33/1/CMMi-Mapping-to-ISOIEC-TR-15504-21998/Page1.html

  4. Paulk, M., Weber, C., Garcia, S., Chrissis, M., Bush, M.: Key practices of the Capability Maturity Model, Version 1.1, Technical Report CMU/SEI-93-TR-025, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 12207:1995/Amd.2:2004(E): Information technology - Software life cycle processes. Amendment 2. Genf (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 15288:2002(E): Systems engineering - System life cycle processes. Genf (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 15504-2:2003(E): Information Technology - Process assessment - Part 2: Performing an assessment. Geneve (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO/IEC 15504-5:2006(E): Information technology - Process assessment - Part 5: An exemplar process assessment model. Genf (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rout, T.P., El Emam, K., Fusani, M., Goldenson, D., Jung, H.: SPICE in retrospect: Developing a standard for process assessment. J. Syst. Softw. 80(9), 1483–1493 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sassenburg, H., Kitson, D.: A Comparative Analysis of CMMI and Automotive SPICE. European SEPG, Amsterdam/Netherlands (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Acquisition, Version 1.2 (November 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Software Engineering Institute: CMMI for Development, Version 1.2 (August 2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Andreas Jedlitschka Outi Salo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bella, F., Hörmann, K., Vanamali, B. (2008). From CMMI to SPICE – Experiences on How to Survive a SPICE Assessment Having Already Implemented CMMI. In: Jedlitschka, A., Salo, O. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2008. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5089. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69566-0_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-69564-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-69566-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics