Abstract
The processes of the two major types of debris flow initiation; the bed erosion type and the landslide-induced type, are discussed and the methods to analyze the respective phenomena are introduced. Especially for the landslide-induced type, a new model of liquefaction of the slid earth mass while in motion is introduced. The earth mass is liquefied at the bottom without water supply from the outside and this liquefied layer gets behind the mass as a following debris flow. The reviews of previous investigations on the mechanics of developed debris flow confirms that the two-phase model is influential, in which debris flow consists of the mixture of two continuum media of fluid phase and solid phase. Using this model, developed debris flows are classified into three types from the point of the dominant stresses within flow. The characteristics of the respective types of flow such as the solids concentration distribution, the velocity distribution, the equilibrium sediment transport concentration are given.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Armanini A, Gregoretti C (2000) Triggering of debris-flow by overland flow; A comparison between theoretical and experimental results. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (eds) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment; Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 117–124
Armanini A, Dalri C, Fraccarolo L, Larcher M, Zorin E (2003) Experimental analysis of the general features of uniform mud-flow. In: Rickenmann D, Chen CL (eds) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Davos, Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 423–434
Ashida K, Takahashi T, Mizuyama T (1977) Study on the initiation of motion of sand mixtures in a steep slope channel. J JSECE 29(4):6–13 (in Japanese)
Bagnold RA (1954) Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 225:49–63
Bagnold RA (1957) The flow of cohesionless grains in fluid. Philos Trans R Soc London, Ser A 249:235–298
Bagnold RA (1966) The shearing and dilatation of dry sand and’ singing’ mechanism. Proc R Soc London, Ser A 295:219–232
Campbell CS (1990) Rapid granular flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 22:57–92
Campbell CS (2001) Granular flows in the elastic limit. Spec Publs Int Ass Sediment 31:83–89
Campbell CS, Brennen CE (1985) Computer simulation of granular shear flows. J Fluid Mech 151:167–188
Chen CL (1988) Generalized viscoplastic debris flow. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 114(3):237–258
Coussot P (1995) Structural similarity and transition from Newtonian to non-Newtonian behavior for clay-water suspensions. Phys Rev Lett 74:3971–3974
Gotoh H, Sakai T (1997) Numerical simulation of sheetflow as granular materials. J Waterw Port C Div 123(6):329–336
Gotoh H, Tsujimoto T, Nakagawa H (1994) Numerical model of interface momentum transfer and interparticle collision in bedload layer. In: Proceedings APD-IAHR, pp 565–572
Hirano M, Hashimoto H, Fukutomi K, Taguma K, Pallu MS (1992) Nondimensional parameters governing hyperconcentrated flow in an open channel. J Hydraul Eng-ASCE 36:221–226 (in Japanese)
Iverson RM (1997) The physics of debris flows. Rev Geophys 35(3):245–296
Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (1987) The physics of debris flows-a conceptual assessment. In: Beschesta et al. (ed.) Erosion and sedimentation in the Pacific rim. IAHS publ. 165:155–165
Iverson RM, Denlinger RP (2001) Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain. J Geophys Res 106(B1):537–552
Johnson AM (1965) A model for debris flow. Ph.D. Dissertation Pa. State Univ., State College
Johnson AM (1970) Physical processes in geology. Freeman, New York
Julien PY, O’Brien JS (1997) On the importance of mud and debris flow rheology in structural design. In: Proceedings 1st Inter-national Conference on Debris-Flow Hazards Mitigation: Mechanics, Prediction, and Assessment, New York, ASCE, pp 350–359
Krieger JS (1972) Rheology of monodisperse lattices. Advance of Colloid Interface Science 3:111–136
Phillips RJ, Armstrong RC, Brown RA, Graham AL, Abbot JR (1992) A constitutive equation for concentrated suspensions that accounts for shear-induced particle migration. Phys Fluids A4(1):30–40
Sabo Technical Center (1998) Reality of sediment disasters in 1997. pp 25–27 (in Japanese)
Straub S (2001) Bagnold revisited: implications for the rapid motion of high-concentration sediment flows. Spec Publs Int Ass Sediment 31:91–109
Takahashi T (1978) Mechanical characteristics of debris flow. J Hydr Eng Div-ASCE 104:1153–1169
Takahashi T (1991) Debris flow. Balkema, Rotterdam
Takahashi T (1999) Mechanics of viscous debris flow. In: Takahashi (ed) Japan-China joint research on the mechanism and the countermeasures for the viscous debris flow. Research report of Group C3 of special project associated with IDNDR sponsored by Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture, Japan, pp 64–84
Takahashi T (2000) Initiation and flow of various types of debrisflow. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (ed) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 15–25
Takahashi T (2004) Mechanics and countermeasures for debris flow. Kinmiraisha, Nagoya (in Japanese)
Takahashi T, Nakagawa, H (1994) Natural dam formation and the disaster-a possible explanation of one extreme event. In: Proceedings International Workshop on Floods and Inundations related to Large Earth Movements, A8.1–A8.12
Takahashi T, Satofuka Y (2002) Generalized theory of stony and turbulent muddy debris-flow and its practical model. J JSECE 55(3):33–42 (in Japanese)
Takahashi T, Tsujimoto H (1997) Mechanics of granular flow in inclined chute. J Hydraul Coast Environ Eng JSCE 565:57–71 (in Japanese)
Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Satofuka Y (2000) Newtonian fluid model for viscous debris-flow. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (ed) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 255–262
Takahashi T, Nakagawa H, Satofuka Y, Kawaike K (2001) Flood and sediment disasters triggered by 1999 rainfall in Venezuela; a river restoration plan for an alluvial fan. J Natural Disaster Science, JSNDS 23(2):65–82
Takahashi T, Satofuka Y, Kashimoto S (2003) Motion of landslideinduced debris flow. In: Rickenmann D, Chen CL (eds) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment; Proceedings International Conference, Davos, Millpress, Rotterdam, pp 399–410
Tognacca C, Bezzola GR, Minor HE (2000) Threshold criterion for debris-flow initiation due to channel-bed failure. In: Wieczorek GF, Naeser ND (ed) Debris flow hazards mitigation: mechanics, prediction, and assessment. Proceedings International Conference, Taipei, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 89–97
Yano K, Daido A (1965) Fundamental study on mud-flow. Bull Disaster Prev Res Inst Kyoto Univ 14:69–83
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Takahashi, T. (2007). Progress in Debris Flow Modeling. In: Sassa, K., Fukuoka, H., Wang, F., Wang, G. (eds) Progress in Landslide Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70965-7_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70965-7_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-70964-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-70965-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)