Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper discusses two advancements in the theory of designing truthful randomized mechanisms.

Our first contribution is a new framework for developing truthful randomized mechanisms. The framework enables the construction of mechanisms with polynomially small failure probability. This is in contrast to previous mechanisms that fail with constant probability. Another appealing feature of the new framework is that bidding truthfully is a strongly dominant strategy. The power of the framework is demonstrated by an \(O(\sqrt m)\)-mechanism for combinatorial auctions that succeeds with probability \(1-O(\frac {\log m} {\sqrt m})\).

The other major result of this paper is an O(logmloglogm) randomized truthful mechanism for combinatorial auction with subadditive bidders. The best previously-known truthful mechanism for this setting guaranteed an approximation ratio of \(O(\sqrt m)\). En route, the new mechanism also provides the best approximation ratio for combinatorial auctions with submodular bidders currently achieved by truthful mechanisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N.: Limitations of vcg-based mechanisms. In: STOC 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Schapira, M.: Approximation algorithms for combinatorial auctionss with complement-free bidders. In: STOC 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dobzinski, S., Nisan, N., Schapira, M.: Truthful randomized mechanisms for combinatorial auctions. In: STOC 2006, (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Feige, U.: On maximizing welfare where the utility functions are subadditive. In: STOC 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Feige, U., Vondrak, J.: Approximation algorithms for allocation problems: Improving the factor of 1-1/e. In: FOCS 2006 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg, A., Hartline, J., Karlin, A., Saks, M., Wright, A.: Competitive auctions. Games and Economic Behaviour (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holzman, R., Kfir-Dahav, N., Monderer, D., Tennenholtz, M.: Bundling equilibrium in combinatrial auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 47, 104–123 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Khot, S., Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mehta, A.: Inapproximability results for combinatorial auctions with submodular utility functions. In: Deng, X., Ye, Y. (eds.) WINE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3828, Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Lavi, R., Mu’alem, A., Nisan, N.: Towards a characterization of truthful combinatorial auctions. In: The 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lavi, R., Swamy, C.: Truthful and near-optimal mechanism design via linear programming. In: FOCS (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmann, B., Lehmann, D., Nisan, N.: Combinatorial auctions with decreasing marginal utilities. In: ACM conference on electronic commerce (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nisan, N.: The communication complexity of approximate set packing and covering. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nisan, N.: ntroduction to Mechanism Design (for Computer Scientists). In: Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V. (eds.) “Algorithmic Game Theory” (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Algorithmic mechanism design. In: STOC (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nisan, N., Ronen, A.: Computationally feasible vcg-based mechanisms. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dobzinski, S. (2007). Two Randomized Mechanisms for Combinatorial Auctions. In: Charikar, M., Jansen, K., Reingold, O., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds) Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX RANDOM 2007 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4627. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74208-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74208-1_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74207-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74208-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics