Abstract
In spite of their considerable significance in order to maintain a reasonable balance between a great number of security concerns and the freedom of navigation, the compensation provisions analysed in this study have not played a major role in international dispute settlement. Considering the increasing number of interdiction measures, it seems doubtful whether this lack of application is due to the absence of abusive interferences.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2007). Conclusions and outlook. In: State Responsibility for Interferences with the Freedom of Navigation in Public International Law. Hamburg Studies on Maritime Affairs, vol 11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74333-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74333-0_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74332-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74333-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)