Skip to main content

Emergent Phenomena Only Belong to Biology

  • Conference paper
Advances in Artificial Life (ECAL 2007)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4648))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1603 Accesses

Abstract

This rather philosophical paper discusses the necessary three ingredients which together allow a collective phenomenon to be described as “emergent”. First the phenomenon, as usual, requires a group of agents entering in a non-linear relationship and entailing the existence of two semantic descriptions depending on the scale of observation. Second this phenomenon has to be observed by a mechanical observer instead of a human one, which has the natural capacity for temporal and/or spatial integration. Finally, for this natural observer to detect and select the collective phenomenon, it needs to do so in rewards of the adaptive value this phenomenon is responsible for. The presence of natural selection drives us to defend, with many authors, the idea that emergent phenomena can only belong to biology. After a brief philosophical plea, we present a simple and illustrative computer thought experiment in which a society of agents evolves a stigmergic collective behavior as an outcome of its greater adaptive value. The three ingredients are illustrated and discussed within this experimental context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Poundstone, W.: Recursive Universe: Cosmic Consequences and the Limits of Scientific Knowledge. NTC Publishing Group, Lincolnwood (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kubik, A.: Toward a formalization of emergence. Artificial Life 9(1), 41–65 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedeau, M.: Weak emergence. Philosophical perspectives: Mind, causation and world 11, 375–399 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bar-Yam, Y.: A mathematical theory of strong emergence using multiscale variety. Complex 9(6), 15–24 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson, P.: More is different. Science 177, 393–396 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Laughlin, R.: A different universe: reinventing physics from the bottom down. Basic Books, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodwin, B.: How the Leopard Changed Its Spots: The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton (March 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kauffmann, S.: At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford University Press, Oxford (Oct. 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maynard-Smith, J., Szathmary, E.: The Major Transitions in Evolution. Oxford University Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cariani, P.: Emergence of new signal-primitives in neural networks. Intellectica 2, 95–143 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groß, R., Bonani, M., Mondada, F., Dorigo, M.: Autonomous self-assembly in swarm-bots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 22(6), 1115–1130 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bersini, H.: Whatever emerges should be intrinsically useful. In: Artificial life 9, pp. 226–231. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crutchfield, J.: Is anything ever new? considering emergence. In: Cowan, G., Pines, D., Melzner, D. (eds.) Integrative Themes. Santa Fe Institute Studies in the Sciences of Complexity, vol. 19, Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crutchfield, J., Mitchell, M.: The evolution of emergent computation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 23, 103 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Corning, P.: The re-emergence of ”emergence”: A venerable concept in search of a theory. Complexity 7(6), 18–30 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Dorigo, M., Maniezzo, V., Colorni, A.: The ant system: Optimization by a colony of cooperating agents. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B: Cybernetics 26(1), 29–41 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Calvin, W.: The brain as a darwin machine. Nature 330, 33–34 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Edelman, G.: Neural Darwinism. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Baas, N.: Emergence, hierarchies and hyper-structures. In: Langton, C.G. (ed.) Artificial Life III, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 515–537. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing, Reading (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Fernando Almeida e Costa Luis Mateus Rocha Ernesto Costa Inman Harvey António Coutinho

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bersini, H., Philemotte, C. (2007). Emergent Phenomena Only Belong to Biology. In: Almeida e Costa, F., Rocha, L.M., Costa, E., Harvey, I., Coutinho, A. (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. ECAL 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4648. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74913-4_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74913-4_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-74912-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-74913-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics