Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Objective Risk Measures

  • Chapter
Catalogue of Risks

  • 1405 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adams J (1995) Risk. University College London Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow KJ, Cropper ML, Eads GC, Hahn RW, Lave LB, Noll RG, Portney PR, Russell M, Schmalensee R, Smith VK & and Stavins RN (1996) Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health and safety regulations. Science, 272, pp 221–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aven T, Vinnem JE & Vollen F (2005) Perspectives on risk acceptance criteria and management for installations – application to a development project. In: Kolowrocki (ed.) Advances in Safety and Reliability. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 107–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball DJ & Floyd PJ (2001) Societal Risks. Final Report. School of Health, Biological/Environmental Sciences. Middlesex University. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bea RG (1990) Reliability criteria for New and Existing Platforms. Proceedings of the 22nd Offshore Technology Conference 7.-10. May 1990, Houston, Texas, pp 393–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Philipson TJ & Soares RR (2003) The Quantity and Quality of Life and the Evolution of World Inequality. May 10, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnenblust H (1998) Risk-based decision making in the transportation sector; In: RE Jorissen, PJM Stallen, (eds.), Quantified societal risk and policy making. Kluwer academic publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Bratzke J, Parzeller M & Köster F (2004) Deutsches Forensisches Sektionsregister startet. Deutsches ärzteblatt, Jahrgang 101, Heft 18, 30. April 2004, pp A1258–A1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringmann G, Stich A & Holzgrabe U (2005) Infektionserreger bedrohen arme und reiche Länder - Sonderforschungsbereich 630: “Erkennung, Gewinnung und funktionale Analyse von Wirkstoffen gegen Infektionskrankheiten”, BLICK, Forschungsschwerpunkt, pp 22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgmann M (2005) Risks and decisions for conservation and environmental management. Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • BZS (1995) Bundesamt für Zivilschutz. KATANOS – Katastrophen und Notlagen in der Schweiz, eine vergleichende übersicht, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • BZS (2003) Bundesamt für Zivilschutz. KATARISK – Katastrophen und Notlagen in der Schweiz. Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Camilleri D (2001) Malta’s Risk Minimization to Earthquake, Volcanic & Tsunami Damage, Safety, Risk, Reliability – Trends in Engineering, Malta 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL & Lee L (1979) Catalog of risk. Health Physics 36, pp 707–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen BL (1991) Catalog of Risks extended and updated. Health Physics, Vol. 61, September 1991, pp 317–335

    Google Scholar 

  • Covello VT (1991) Risk comparisons and risk communications: Issues and problems in comparing health and environmental risks. In: RE Kasperson (ed.), Communicating Risk to the Public. Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp 79–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditlevsen O (1996) Risk Acceptance Criteria and/or Decision Optimisation. Structural Engineering in consideration of Economy. 15 IABSE, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • DUAP (1997) – Department of Urban Affairs and Planning: Risk criteria for land use safety planning. Hazardous Industry Planning Advisory, Paper No. 4, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Easterlin RA (2000) The Worldwide Standard of Living since 1800. Journal of Economic Perspectives. Vol. 14, No. 1, Winter 2000, pp 7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellingwood BR (1999) Probability-based structural design: Prospects for acceptable risk bases. Application of Statistics and Probability (ICASP 8), Sydney, Band 1, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellingwood BR (1999) Probability-based structural design: Prospects for acceptable risk bases. Application of Statistics and Probability (ICASP 8), Sydney, Vol. 1, pp 11–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer FR (1967) Siting criteria: a new approach. Nuclear Safety 8, pp 539–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Femers S & Jungermann H (1991) Risikoindikatoren. Eine Systematisierung und Diskussion von Risikomassnahmen und Risikovergleichen. In: Forschungszentrum Jülich; Programmgruppe Mensch, Umwelt, Technik (Hrsg.): Arbeiten zur Risiko-Kommunikation, Heft 21. Jülich 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • FHA (1990) Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration: Guide Specification and Commentary for Vessel Collision Design of Highway Bridges, Volume I: Final Report, Publication Nr. FHWA-RD-91-006

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrick BJ (2000) Invited Expert Presentation: Technical Area: Nuclear Power Plants. Proceedings – Part 2/2 of Promotion of Technical Harmonization on Risk-Based Decision-Making, Workshop, May 2000, Stresa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrick BJ et al. (1987) Space Shuttle Probabalistic Risk Assessment, Proof-of-Concept Study, Auxiliary Power Unit and Hydraulic Power Unit Analysis Report. Prepared for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • GFSO (2007) - German Federal Statistical Office. http://www.destatis.de

    Google Scholar 

  • Gmünder FK, Schiess M & Meyer P (2000) Risk Based Decision Making in the Control of Major Chemical Hazards in Switzerland – Liquefied Petroleum, Ammonia and Chloride as Examples. Proceedings – Part 2/2 of Promotion of Technical Harmonization on Risk-Based Decision-Making, Workshop, May, 2000, Stresa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Greminger P et al. (2005) Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft. RiskPlan, RiskInfo

    Google Scholar 

  • GTZ (2004) – German Technical Co-operation. Risikoanalyse – eine Grundlage der Katastrophenvorsorge. Eschborn

    Google Scholar 

  • Halperin K (1993) A Comparative Analysis of Six Methods for Calculating Travel Fatality Risk, Franklin Pierce Law Center,

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambly EC & Hambly EA (1994) Risk evaluation and realism, Proc ICE Civil Engineering, Vol. 102, pp 64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hungerbühler K, Ranke J & Mettier T (1999) Chemische Produkte und Prozesse – Grundkonzept zum umweltorientierten Design. Springer Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen W (1999) Kernreaktorpraktikum. Vorlesungsmitschriften. Institut für Energietechnik, Technische Universität Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen S, Myrheim H, Bayly DR & Vinneman JE (2005) Occupational risk in decommisining/removal projects. In: Kolowrocki (ed.), Advances in Safety and Reliability. Taylor & Francis Group, pp 807–814

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter P & Hammitt JK (2001) Human Health Metrics for Environmental Decision Support Tools: Lessons from Health Economics and Decision Analysis. National Risk Management Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, September 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • IE (2004) http://www.internationaleconomics.net/research-development.html

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2000) – International Maritime Organisation: Formal Safety Assessment: Decision Parameters including Risk Acceptance Criteria, Maritime Safety Committee, 72nd Session, Agenda Item 16, MSC72/16, Submitted by Norway, 14. February 2000

    Google Scholar 

  • James ML (1996) Acceptable Transport Safety. Research Paper 30, Department of the Parliamentary Library, http://www.aph.gov.au/library/pubs/rp/1995-96/96rp30.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN (2007) Loss of life estimation in flood risk assessment – Theory and applications. PhD thesis, Rijkswaterstaat – Delft Cluster, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • Jonkman SN, van Gelder PHAJM & Vrijling JK (2003) An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials A 99, pp 1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kafka P (1999) How safe is safe enough? – An unresolved issue for all technologies. In: Schuëller GI & Kafka P (eds.), Safety and Reliability. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 385–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan RM, Bush JW & Berry CC (1976) Health Status: Types of Validity and the Index of Well-being. Health Services Research 11, 4, pp 478–507

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly KE (1991) The myth of 10-6 as a definition of acceptable risk. In Proceedings of the 84th Annual Meeting of the Air & Waste Management Association, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, June 1991

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleine-Gunk B (2007) Anti-Aging-Medizin – Hoffnung oder Humbug? Deutsches ärzteblatt, Jg. 104, Heft 28-29, 16th Juli 2007, B1813-B1817

    Google Scholar 

  • Kröger W & Høj NP (2000) Risk Analyses of Transportation on Road and Railway. Proceedings – Part 2/2 of Promotion of Technical Harmonization on Risk-Based Decision-Making, Workshop, May 2000, Stresa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen OD (1993) Ship Collision with Bridges, The Interaction between Vessel Traffic and Bridge Structures. IABSE (International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering), Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT & Murray CL (2004) Global burden of disease and risk factors. World Health Organization

    Google Scholar 

  • LUW (2005) – Landesumweltamt Nordrhein-Westfalen. Beurteilungsmaß ;stäbe für krebserzeugende Verbindungen. http://www.lua.nrw.de/luft/immissionen

    Google Scholar 

  • Maag T (2004) Risikobasierte Beurteilung der Personensicherheit von Wohnbauten im Brandfall unter Verwendung von Bayes’schen Netzen. Insitut für Baustatik und Konstruktion, ETH Zürich, vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich, IBK Bericht 282, März 2004 Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen TC (1997) Cost Benefit Analysis of Existing Bulk Carriers. DNV Paper Series No. 97-P 008

    Google Scholar 

  • McBean EA & Rovers FA (1998) Statistical Procedures for Analysis of Environmental Monitoring Data & Risk Assessment. Prentice Hall PTR Environmental Management & Engineering Series, Vol. 3, Prentice Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Melchers RE (1999) Structural Reliability Analysis and Prediction, John Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  • Merz HA, Schneider T & Bohnenblust H (1995) Bewertung von technischen Risiken – Beiträge zur Strukturierung und zum Stand der Kenntnisse, Modelle zur Bewertung von Todesfallrisiken. Polyprojekt Risiko und Sicherheit: Band 3, vdf Hochschulverlag AG an der ETH Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller U (2003) Europäische Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte II: Das lange 19. Jahrhundert. Lehrstuhl für Wirtschafts- und Sozialgeschichte der Neuzeit. Vorlesung. Europäische Universität Viadrina, Frankfurt (Oder)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray C & Lopez A (1997) Regional patterns of disability-free life expectancy and disability-adjusted life expectancy: Global burden of disease study. The Lancet 349, pp 1347–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NASA (1989) Independent Assessment of Shuttle Accident Scenario Probabilities for the Galileo Mission. Vol. 1, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NCHS (2001) – National Centre for Health Statistics: National Vital Statistics Report, Vol. 48, No. 18, 7. February 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Oeppen J & Vaupel JW (2002) Demography. Broken limits to life expectancy. Science 2002, 296, pp 1029–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmans R (1999) Deutsche militärische Verluste im Zweiten Weltkrieg. Beiträge zur Militärgeschichte Band 46. R. Oldenbourg Verlag, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit M (1998) Living with Natural Hazards. National Geographic, Vol. 194, No. 1, July 1998, National Geographic Society, pp 2–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Paté-Cornell ME(1994) Quantitative safety goals for risk management of industrials facilities. Structural Safety, 13, pp 145–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Perenboom R, van Herten L, Boshuizen H & van den Bos G (2004) Trends in disability-free life expectancy. Disability and Rehabilitation 26(7), pp 377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proske D (2004) Katalog der Risiken. Dirk Proske Verlag, Dresden

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R & Streicher H (2002) Optimization and Target Reliabilities. JCSS Workshop on Reliability Bades Code Calibration. Zürich, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, ETH Zürich, Switzerland, March 21–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Rackwitz R (1998) Zuverlässigkeit und Lasten im konstruktiven Ingenieurbau. Vorlesungsskript. Technische Universität München

    Google Scholar 

  • Randsaeter A (2000) Risk Assessment in the Offshore Industry. Proceedings – Part 2/2 of Promotion of Technical Harmonization on Risk-Based Decision-Making, Workshop, May 2000, Stresa, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelhase T & Weber S (2007) Die Todesursachenstatistik in Deutschland. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz, 7, 25. Juni 2007, DOI 10.1007/s00103-007-0287-6, pp 969–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid W (2005) Risk Management Down Under. Risknews 03/05, pp 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Schütz H, Wiedemann P, Hennings W, Mertens J & Clauberg M (2003) Vergleichende Risikobewertung: Konzepte, Probleme und Anwendungsmöglichkeiten. Abschlussbericht zum BfS-Projekt StSch 4217. Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Programmgruppe ,,Mensch, Umwelt, Technik“

    Google Scholar 

  • Shortreed J, Hicks J & Craig L (2003) Basic framework for Risk Management – Final report. March 28, 2003, Network for environmental risk assessment and management. Prepared for the Ontario Ministry of the Environment

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjong R & Ronold K (1998) Societal Indicators and Risk acceptance. 17th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 1998 by ASME, OMAE98-1488

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic P (1999) Trust, Emotion, Sex, Politics, and Science: Surveying the Risk-Assessment Battlefield, Risk Analysis, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp 689–701

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe G (1992) Die Sicherheit tragender Baukonstruktionen, 2. Neubearbeitete Auflage, Wien, Springer Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • TAW (1988) Technische Adviescommissie voor de Waterkeringen; Some considerations of an acceptable level of risk in the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • USAEC (1975) United States Atomic Energy Commission. Reactor Safety Study, WASH-1400

    Google Scholar 

  • van Breugel K (2001) Establishing Performance Criteria for Concrete Protective Structures fib-Symposium: Concrete & Environment, Berlin 3-5. Oktober 2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Vennemann MMT, Berger K, Richter D & Baune BT (2006) Unterschätzte Suizidraten durch unterschiedliche Erfassung in Gesundheitsämter. Deutsches ärzteblatt, Jg. 103, Heft 18, pp A 1222–A 1226

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi W (1995) Risk, Regulation and Responsibility: Principle for Australian Risk Policy. Risk. Regulation and Responsibility Promoting reason in workplace and product safety regulation. Proceedings of a conference held by the Institute of Public Affairs and the Centre for Applied Economics, Sydney, 13 July 1995. http://www.ipa.org.au/ Conferences/viscusi.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Vrijling JK, van Gelder PHAJM, Goossens LHJ, Voortman HG, Pandey MD (2001) A Framework for Risk criteria for critical Infrastructures: Fundamentals and Case Studies in the Netherlands, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Technology, Policy and Innovation, “Critical Infrastructures”, Delft, The Netherlands, June 26–29, 2001, Uitgeverrij Lemma BV

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiland SK, Rapp K, Klenk J & Keil U (2006) Zunahme der Lebenserwartung – Größenordnungen, Determinanten und Perspektiven. Deutsches ärzteblatt, Jg. 103, Heft 16, 21. April 2006, pp A 1072–A 1077

    Google Scholar 

  • White M (2003) Twenthieth Centuray Atlas – Worldwide Statistcs of Death Tolls. http://users.erols.com/mwhite28

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R (1979) Analyzing the Daily Risks of Life, Technology Review 81, February 1979, pp 40–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack F, Rothschild MA & Wegener R (2007) Blitzunfall – Energieüber-tragungsmechanismen und medizinische Folgen. Deutsches ärzteblatt, Jg. 104, Heft 51-52, 24th Dezember 2007, pp B3124–3128

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingle E (1998) Women and Population. National Geographic. Number 4, October 1998, pp 36–55

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna Institute of Mountain Risk Engineering, Peter-Jordan-Street 82, 1190 Vienna, Austria

    Dirk Proske

  2. Goetheallee 35, 01309 Dresden, Germany

    Dirk Proske

Authors
  1. Dirk Proske
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Proske, D. (2008). Objective Risk Measures. In: Catalogue of Risks. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79555-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79555-1_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-79554-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-79555-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation