Skip to main content

Evaluation of ADAS with a supported-Driver Model for desired Allocation of Tasks between Human and Technology Performance

  • Chapter
Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2009

Part of the book series: VDI-Buch ((VDI-BUCH))

  • 1610 Accesses

Abstract

Partly automated driving is relevant for solving mobility problems, but also cause concerns with respect to driver’s reliability in task performance. The presented supported driver model is therefore intended to answer in which circumstances, what type of support enhances the driver’s ability to control the vehicle. It became apparent that prerequisites for performing tasks differ per driving task’s type and require different support. The possible support for each driving task’s type has been combined with support-types to reduce the error causations from each different performance level (i.e. knowledge-based, rule-based and skill-based performance). The allocation of support in relation to performance level and driving task’s type resulted in a supported driver model and this model relates the requested circumstances to appropriate support types. Among three tested ADAS systems, semi-automated parking showed best allocation of support; converting the demanding parallel parking task into a rather routine-like operation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. European Commission, Communication on the Intelligent Car Initiative “Raising awareness of ICT for smarter, safer and cleaner vehicles”, COM(2006) 59-final, European Commission, Brussels, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stevens W., Evolution to an Automated Highway System. In: P.A. Ioannou (Ed.), Automated Highway Systems, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 109-124, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rothengatter, T., et. al., The driver. In: J.A. Michon (Ed.), Generic Intelligent Driver Support, A comprehensive report on GIDS, Taylor & Francis, pp. 33-52, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Endsley, M., Kiris, E., The Out-of-the-loop performance problem and level of control in automation, Human Factors, 37, no. 2, pp. 381-394, 1995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Arem, B., et. al., The impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on traffic-flow characteristics, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 7, no. 4, pp. 429-436, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollnagel, E., A function-centered approach to joint driver-vehicle system design. Cognition, Technology & Work, 8, no. 3, pp. 169-173, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McRuer, D.T., et. al., New results in driving steering control. Human Factors 19, pp. 381-397, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dirken, J.M., Product-ergonomie. Ontwerpen voor gebruikers, Delft University Press, Delft, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rasmussen, J., Skills, Rules and Knowledge: Signals, Signs and other Distinctions in Human Performance Models, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man & Cybernatics, Vol. 13, pp. 257-266, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michon, J., A critical view of driver behavior models: what do we know, what should we doffi In: Evans, L., Schwing, R.C., Human behavior and traffic safety, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 485-524, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rasmussen, J., A taxonomy for describing human malfunction in industrial installations. In: Journal of occupational accidents, 4, pp. 311-333, 1982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hale, A., et. al., Human error models as predictors of accident scenarios for designers in road transport systems, Ergonomics, 33, pp.1377-1388, 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leveson, N. (2005). Adaptive Cruise Control – System Overview, Massachusetts institute of technology, Anaheim USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gat, I., et. al., Monocular Vision Advance Warning System for the Automotive Aftermarket, SAE World Congress & Exhibition 2005, Detroit USA, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hoedemaker D.M., Behavioral reactions to advanced cruise control: results of a driving simulator experiment. In: Van der Heijden, R.E.C.M., Automation of Car Driving. Exploring societal impacts and conditions, Delft University Press, Delft, pp. 101-121, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van den Beukel, A., van der Voort, M. (2009). Evaluation of ADAS with a supported-Driver Model for desired Allocation of Tasks between Human and Technology Performance. In: Meyer, G., Valldorf, J., Gessner, W. (eds) Advanced Microsystems for Automotive Applications 2009. VDI-Buch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00745-3_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00745-3_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00744-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00745-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics