Abstract
This work provides a comparison of learning by erasing [1] and iterated epistemic update [2] as analyzed in dynamic epistemic logic (see e.g.[3]). We show that finite identification can be modelled in dynamic epistemic logic and that the elimination process of learning by erasing can be seen as iterated belief-revision modelled in dynamic doxastic logic.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Lange, S., Wiehagen, R., Zeugmann, T.: Learning by erasing. In: Arikawa, S., Sharma, A.K. (eds.) ALT 1996. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1160, pp. 228–241. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
Baltag, A., Moss, L.: Logics for epistemic programs. Synthese 139(2), 165–224 (2004)
van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Jain, S., Osherson, D., Royer, J.S., Sharma, A.: Systems that Learn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)
Gold, E.: Language identification in the limit. Information and Control 10, 447–474 (1967)
Tiede, H.J.: Identifiability in the limit of context-free generalized quantifiers. Journal of Language and Computation 1, 93–102 (1999)
Costa Florêntio, C.: Learning generalized quantifiers. In: Proc. 7th ESSLLI Student Session (2002)
Gierasimczuk, N.: The problem of learning the semantics of quantifiers. In: ten Cate, B.D., Zeevat, H.W. (eds.) TbiLLC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4363, pp. 117–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Kelly, K.: The Logic of Reliable Inquiry. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)
Osherson, D., de Jongh, D., Martin, E., Weinstein, S.: Formal learning theory. In: van Benthem, J., Ter Meulen, A. (eds.) Handbook of Logic and Language, pp. 737–775. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)
Martin, E., Osherson, D.: Elements of Scientific Inquiry. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Hintikka, J.: Knowledge and Belief. An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions. Cornell University Press (1962)
Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)
Freivalds, R., Zeugmann, T.: Co–learning of recursive languages from positive data. In: Bjorner, D., Broy, M., Pottosin, I.V. (eds.) PSI 1996. LNCS, vol. 1181, pp. 122–133. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)
van Benthem, J., Gerbrandy, J., Pacuit, E.: Merging frameworks for interaction: DEL and ETL. In: Proc. TARK 2007, pp. 72–81 (2007)
Batlag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements and common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Proc. TARK 1998, pp. 43–56 (1998)
Freivalds, R., Karpinski, M., Smith, C., Wiehagen, R.: Learning by the process of elimination. Information and Computation 176(1), 37–50 (2002)
Gierasimczuk, N.: Identification through inductive verification. Application to monotone quantifiers. In: Bosch, P., Gabelaia, D., Lang, J. (eds.) TbiLLC 2007. LNCS, vol. 5422, pp. 193–205. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gierasimczuk, N. (2009). Learning by Erasing in Dynamic Epistemic Logic. In: Dediu, A.H., Ionescu, A.M., MartÃn-Vide, C. (eds) Language and Automata Theory and Applications. LATA 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5457. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00982-2_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00982-2_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-00981-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-00982-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)