Skip to main content

Uncertainty in Multi-Criteria Evaluation Techniques When Used for Land Suitability Analysis

  • Conference paper
Crop Modeling and Decision Support

Abstract

Uncertainty analysis is rarely considered in the application of predictive models in agriculture, resource planning and land suitability analysis. Uncertainty in modeling land suitability for agricultural production arises from a variety of sources. An important source of error is due to uncertainty in model inputs and parameters, especially in the case of multi-criteria analysis requiring data from physical measurements or expert opinion from regional workshops. The concept, scope and taxonomy of uncertainty analysis are discussed in the context of resource planning and land suitability analysis. The model used for land suitability was derived using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) originally introduced by Saaty in the mid 1970s. The general approach is also appropriate to modeling suitability to pasture and forestry as well as agricultural crops. The deterministic AHP approach produces point estimates only, with no indication of error or confidence in the output. We have integrated the AHP approach with a stochastic simulation model for uncertainty assessment. Since the AHP approach is deterministic, procedural adjustments are required to estimate uncertainty in predictions. The approach taken was to represent expert judgements and ratings by probability distributions and to implement a graded series of stochastic simulations. Variable weight values were subject to constraints of range and unit-sum for each level of the hierarchy in the AHP model. Results for uncertainty analysis are presented for land-use suitability in south-west Victoria in Australia for the crops ryegrass/sub-clover and winter wheat. The work was carried out in the context of a program supporting climate change adaptation funded by the Victorian Government. Estimates of uncertainty for the AHP approach were conservative in nature and a primary objective was to explore and develop further a generalised approach to uncertainty assessment for the AHP model and similar multi-criteria evaluation techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 309.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Benke KK, Hamilton AJ, Lowell KE (2007) Modeling Uncertainty and Risk Assessment in the Management of Environmental Resources. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management 14:16–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benke KK, Hamilton AJ (2008a) Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment: Uncertainty and Measures of Central Tendency for Skewed Distributions. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 22:533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benke KK, Lowell KE, Hamilton AJ (2008b) Parameter Uncertainty, Sensitivity Analysis and Prediction Error in a Water-Balance Hydrological Model. Mathematical and Computer Modeling, 47:1134–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgman MA (2001) Flaws in Subjective Assessments of Ecological Risks and Means for Correcting Them. Australian Journal of Environmental Management 8:219–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamini H, Prato T (2006) Using Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis in Natural Resource Management, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacking I (2001) An Introduction to Probability and Inductive Logic, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn ED (2003) Decision Making with Uncertain Judgements: A Stochastic Formulation of the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Decision Sciences 34:443–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haines LM (1998) A Statistical Approach to the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Interval Judgements. (I). Distributions on Feasible Regions. European Journal of Operational Research 110:112–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC (1993) Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Use in Performance Assessment for Radioactive Waste Disposal. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 42:327–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helton JC, Burmaster DE (1996) Guest Editorial: Treatment of Aleatory and Epistemic Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 54:91–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain H, Sposito V, Evans C (2006) Sustainable Land Resource Assessment in Regional and Urban Systems. Applied GIS 2(3):24.1–24.21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iman RL, Conover WJ (1983) A Modern Approach to Statistics. New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonsky J (2005) Measuring Efficiency of Production Units by AHP Models. ISAHP 2005. Honolulu, Hawaii.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ (1979) A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics 21:239–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustajoki J, Hamalainen RP, Lindstedt MRK (2006) Using Intervals for Global Sensitivity and Worst-Case Analyses in Multiattribute Value Trees. European Journal of Operational Research 174:278–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oberkampf WL, Helton JC, Joslyn CA, Wojtkiewicz SF, Ferson S (2004) Challenge Problems: Uncertainty in System Response given Uncertain Parameters. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 85:11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of Decision Making, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soanes, C., Hawker, S. Compact Oxford English Dictionary, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sposito VJ (2006) A Strategic Approach to Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation. Applied GIS 2(3): 23.1–23.26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vose D (2000) Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Tsinghua University Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Benke, K.K., Pelizaro, C., Lowell, K.E. (2009). Uncertainty in Multi-Criteria Evaluation Techniques When Used for Land Suitability Analysis. In: Cao, W., White, J.W., Wang, E. (eds) Crop Modeling and Decision Support. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01132-0_32

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics