Skip to main content

Business Process Management Governance

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook on Business Process Management 2

Part of the book series: International Handbooks on Information Systems ((INFOSYS))

Abstract

Most executives, if not all, are concerned about improving operational performance. While this may be obvious, what is not nearly as apparent is precisely how the most successful firms are able to sustain and optimize operational performance improvements. Whereas most firms are becoming increasingly adept at executing improvements to their operations in projects of small scope, many firms continue to struggle when it comes to projects of larger scope requiring broad cross-functional collaboration. More importantly, they often do not put in place the subtle, yet critical, elements of BPM governance, including the refinements to organization structure, executive roles and responsibilities, and measurement discipline that are needed to sustain and optimize operational performance improvements. This chapter examines the management practices of BPM governance that enable achieving sustainable, consistent, and flawless execution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Markus and Jacobson (2010) additionally describe various governance mechanisms, identify their advantages and disadvantages, and provide examples that reveal how governance mechanisms contribute to business process success.

  2. 2.

    The APQC PCF is also discussed by Aitken et al. 2010.

  3. 3.

    For a more detailed discussion on process management maturity and its relations to the topics by Rosemann and vom Brocke 2010. To see how the process maturity model is applied in practice, refer to de Bruin and Doebeli 2010.

References

  • ACORD – Association for Cooperative Operations Research and Development (2009) “Governing documents”. http://www.acord.org/about/governing_docs.aspx. Accessed 16 January 2009

  • APQC (2009) Global benchmarking and metrics: APQC'S PCF. http://www.apqc.org/portal/apqc/site/?path=/research/pcf/index.html. Accessed 16 January 2009

  • Aitken C et al. (2010) Process classification frameworks. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport TH (1993) Process innovation. Harvard Business School, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin T (2009) Business Process Management: Theory on Progression and Maturity. PhD Thesis. Queensland University of Technology. Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bruin T, Doebeli G (2010) An organizational approach to BPM: the experience of an Australian transport provider. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2001a) The superefficient company. Harv Bus Rev (September):82–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2001b) The agenda. Crown Business, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M (2007) The process audit. Harv Bus Rev (April):111–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer M, Stanton S (1999) How process enterprises really work. Harv Bus Rev (November–December):108–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon P (2003) Business process change. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbold RJ (2004) The Fiefdom syndrome. Doubleday, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone TW, Crowston K, Herman GA (2003) Organizing business knowledge: the MIT process handbook. MIT, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus ML, Jacobson DD (2010) Business process goverance. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosemann M, vom Brocke J (2010) The six core elements of business process management. In: vom Brocke J, Rosemann M (eds) Handbook on business process management, vol 2. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummler GA, Brache A (1995) Improving performance: how to manage the white space on the organization chart. Jossey-Bass, Sanfranciso, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanyi A (2005) Process management and the central role of executive mindset. Babson College Process Management Research Report

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanyi A (2006) More for less: the power of process management. Meghan-Kiffer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Supply-Chain Council (2009) Supply-chain operations reference-model. http://www.supply-chain.org/galleries/public-gallery/SCOR%209.0%20Overview%20Booklet.pdf. Accessed 16 January 2009

  • The Standish Group (2009) http://www.standishgroup.com/. Accessed 16 January 2009

  • tmforum (2009) NGOSS business process frame-work (eTOM). http://www.tmforum.org/browse.aspx?catID=1648. Accessed 16 January 2009

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew Spanyi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Spanyi, A. (2010). Business Process Management Governance. In: vom Brocke, J., Rosemann, M. (eds) Handbook on Business Process Management 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01982-1_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics