Skip to main content

Towards a Systematic Metric Based Approach to Evaluate SCAMPI Appraisals

  • Conference paper
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 32))

Abstract

CMMI SCAMPI based appraisals are used worldwide to assess the process quality of organizations. In this paper we introduce a metric-based approach to assess and improve CMMI SCAMPI appraisals. To have a sound basis we at first present an appraisal meta model which defines all types of appraisal elements and their relationships. This meta model can be instantiated to get a concrete SCAMPI appraisal process, offering a precise roadmap for conducting appraisals. Based on the meta model two appraisal quality metrics are defined to systematically assess appraisal activities as well as phases and to support the improvement of appraisals. We describe the definition of these metrics in detail and give some metric interpretation guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SEI, CMMI: CMMI for Development, Version 1.2. CMU/SEI-2006-TR-008, ESC-TR-2006-008, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. McFeeley, R.: IDEAL: A User’s Guide for Software Process Improvement. CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, ADA 305472, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. SEI, CMMI: Appraisal Requirements for CMMI. Version 1.2 (ARC, V1.2) Technical Report, CMU/SEI-2006-TR-011, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. SEI, SCAMPI: Handbook for Conducting Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) B and C Appraisals. Version 1.1, CMU/SEI-2005-HB-005, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. SEI, SCAMPI: Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI) A. Version 1.2: Method Definition Document, CMU/SEI-2006-HB-002, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ekdahl, F., Larsson, S.: Using Internal CMMI Appraisals to Institutionalize Software Development Performance Improvement. In: 32nd EUROMICRO Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (EUROMICRO 2006), pp. 216–223. IEEE Computer Society, Cavtat (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahern, D., Armstrong, J., Clouse, A., Ferguso, J.R., Hayes, W., Nidiffer, K.: CMMI SCAMPI Distilled: Appraisals for Process Improvement. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Courtney-Clark, J.: Performing Consistent Appraisals in a Global Organization. In: 5th NDIA CMMI Technology Conference and User Group, Denver, Colorado, November 16-18 (2005), http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2005cmmi/2005cmmi.html

  9. Jansma, T.: CMMI Implementation for Software at JPL. In: 3rd NDIA CMMI Technology Conference and User Group, Denver, Colorado, November 18-20 (2003), http://www.dtic.mil/ndia/2003CMMI/2003CMMI.html

  10. Oppenheimer, H.L.: The 3Rs and 4As of PIIDs. In: SEPG National Conference, Nashville, Tennessee, March 6-9 (2006), http://www.secc.org.eg/SEPG2006/Ingredients/PDF_files/195.pdf

  11. Bush, M., Dunaway, D.: CMMI Assessments - Motivating Positive Change. Addison-Wesley Longman, Redwood City (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kasse, T.: Action Focused Assessment for Software Process Improvement. Artech House, Norwood (2001) ISBN-13: 978-1580532860

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pricope, S.: Development of an ARC-conformant CMMI Class B Appraisal Method. Master Thesis, RWTH Aachen University (2008) (in German)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ludewig, J., Lichter, H.: Software Engineering – Grundlagen, Menschen, Prozesse, Techniken, 2nd edn. dpunkt.verlag, Heidelberg (2007) ISBN 3-89864-268-2

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pricope, S., Lichter, H. (2009). Towards a Systematic Metric Based Approach to Evaluate SCAMPI Appraisals. In: Bomarius, F., Oivo, M., Jaring, P., Abrahamsson, P. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2009. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 32. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02152-7_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02152-7_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-02151-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-02152-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics