Abstract
This chapter proposes a learning framework - the MULTIPLES framework (Multiple: Learning Tools, Interactions, Perspectives, Learning Experiences and Solution Strategies) - that can be used in e-collaboration settings to encourage the development of multiple perspectives for each individual student regarding the learning concepts in focus. This framework has been designed within the context of social and constructivist learning theories, acknowledging the role of asking learners, working in both groups and individually, to face appropriately designed learning tasks by using multiple learning tools and representation systems while at the same time performing various interactions in order to produce multiple solution strategies ‘in as many ways as possible’. To this end, a case study is reported that illuminates the role played by MULTIPLES in the enhancement of each individual student’s views by generating different solution strategies to the tasks at hand, while at the same time expressing their inter- and intra-individual differences. Specifically, 25 secondary level education students participated in a learning experiment consisting of two tasks asking for the construction of multiple solution strategies regarding the concept of area measurement by exploiting the plethora of tools and representation systems provided by the well-known educational software Cabri-Geometry II (Laborde, 1990). The analysis of the data shows that all these students truly exploited their collaborative experience during the former task and constructed various solution strategies when individually facing the second task, at the same time developing multiple perspectives of the aforementioned learning concepts.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bednar, A.K., Cunningham, D., Duffy, T.M., Perry, J.D.: Theory into practice: How do we link? In: Anglin, G.J. (ed.) Instructional Technology: Past, present and future. Libraries Unlimited, Englewood (1991); Bennett, N.: Teaching styles and Pupil Progress. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1977)
Cohen, L., Manion, L.: Research Methods in Education. Routledge, London (1989)
Collins, A.: Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In: Idol, L., Jones, B.F. (eds.) Educational values and cognitive instruction; Implications for reform, pp. 121–138. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1991)
Dabbagh, N., Bannan-Ritland, B.: Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2005)
Duffy, T.M., Cunningham, D.J.: Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of educational communications and technology, pp. 170–198. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York (1996)
Dabbagh, N.: Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning 1(1), 25–44 (2005)
Daradoumis, T., Marques, J.M.: Distributed Cognition in the Context of Virtual Collaborative Learning. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 13(1/2), 135–148 (2002)
Dennen, V.P.: Task structuring for on-line problem-based learning: A case study. Educational Technology & Society 3(3), 329–336 (2000)
Dillenbourg, P., Schneider, D., Synteta, P.: Virtual Learning Environments. In: Proceedings of 3rd Panhelenic Conference: ICT in Education, Rhodes, Greece, pp. 3–18 (September 2002)
Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., Allen, D.E.: Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. In: Duch, B.J., Groh, S.E., Allen, D.E. (eds.) The Power of Problem-Based Learning, pp. 3–12. Stylus Publishing, Sterling (2001)
Duffy, M.T., Lowyck, J., Jonassen, H.D.: Designing environments for constructive learning. Springer, Berlin (1993)
Harasim, L.: Online Education: Perspectives on a new Environment. Praeger, N.Y (1990)
Harasim, L., Hiltz, S.R., Teles, L., Turoff, M.: Learning Networks: a field guide to Teaching and Learning Online. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)
Hart, K.-M.: Measurement. In: Murray, J. (ed.) Childrens Understanding of Mathematics, pp. 9–22. Athenaeum Press Ltd., G. Britain (1989)
Janvier, C.: Representation and understanding: The notion of function as an example. In: Janvier, C. (ed.) Problems of representation in teaching and learning of mathematics, pp. 67–72. Lawrence erlbaum associates, London (1987)
Jonassen, D.H.: Objectivism versus constructivism: do we need a new philosophical paradigm? Journal of Educational Research 39(3), 5–14 (1991)
Jonassen, D.H., Carr, C., Yueh, H.-P.: Computers as Mindtools for Engaging Learners in Critical Thinking. Tech. Trends 43(2), 24–32 (1998)
Jonassen, D.H.: Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional design theories and models 2, 215–239 (1999)
Jonassen, H.D.: Revisiting Activity Theory as a Framework for Designing Student-Centered Learning Environments. In: Jonassen, D.H., Land, S.M. (eds.) Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments, pp. 89–121. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2000)
Joyce, B., Weil, M.: Models of Teaching. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1972)
Kaput, J.J.: The Representational Roles of Technology in Connecting Mathematics with Authentic Experience. In: Biehler, R., Scholz, R.W., Strasser, R., Winkelman, B. (eds.) Didactics of Mathematics as a Scientific Discipline: The state of the art, pp. 379–397. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1994)
Kordaki, M.: The effect of tools of a computer microworld on students’ strategies regarding the concept of conservation of area. Educational Studies in Mathematics 52, 177–209 (2003)
Kordaki, M.: The role of multiple representation systems in the enhancement of the learner model. In: 3rd International Conference on Multimedia and Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Caceres, Spain, June 2005, pp. 253–258 (2005)
Kordaki, M.: Multiple Representation Systems and Students’ Inter-Individual Learning Differences. In: Kommers, P., Richards, G. (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications (ED-MEDIA), pp. 2127–2134. AACE, Chesapeake (2006)
Kordaki, M., Balomenou, A.: Challenging students to view the concept of area in triangles in a broader context: exploiting the tools of Cabri II. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning 11(1), 99–135 (2006)
Laborde, J.-M.: Cabri-Geometry. Universite de Grenoble, France (1990)
Lemerise, T.: On Intra Interindividual Differences in Children’s Learning Styles. In: Hoyles, C., Noss, R. (eds.) Learning Mathematics and Logo, pp. 191–222. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Maureen, T.: Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning. Educational Technology & Society 3(2), 50–60 (2000)
Murphy, R., Ness, G., Pelletier, J.: Problem-Based Learning Using Web-Based Group Discussions: A Positive Learning Experience for Undergraduate Students. In: Crawford, C., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2001, pp. 1149–1154. AACE, Chesapeake (2001)
Nardi, B.A.: Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In: Nardi, B.A. (ed.) Context and consciousness:Activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Noss, R., Hoyles, C.: Windows on mathematical meanings: Learning Cultures and Computers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1996)
Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Pupils, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, New York (1980)
Pea, R.D.: Practices of distributed intelligence and designs for education. In: Salomon, G. (ed.) Distributed cognitions. Psychological and educational considerations, pp. 47–87. Cambridge University Press, NY (1993)
Rogoff, B.: Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity 4, 209–229 (1994)
Rogers, Y.: A Brief Introduction to Distributed Cognition (August 1997), http://www.cogs.susx.ac.uk/users/yvonner/dcog.html (Retrieved on September 11, 2008)
Salomon, G.: Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and educational considerations. Cambridge University Press, New York (1993)
Schmeck, R.R.: Learning Strategies and Learning Styles. Plenum, New York (1988)
Silver, E.A., Leung, S.S., Cai, J.: Generating multiple solutions for a problem: a comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students. Educational Studies in Mathematics 28, 35–54 (1995)
Snow, R.E.: Individual differences and the design of Educational programs. American Psychologist 41, 1029–1039 (1986)
Vygotsky, L.: Mind in Society. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1978)
Wilson, B.G., Cole, P.: Cognitive teaching models. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 601–621. Simon & Schuster Macmillan, New York (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kordaki, M. (2009). ‘MULTIPLES’: A Challenging Learning Framework for the Generation of Multiple Perspectives within e-Collaboration Settings. In: Daradoumis, T., Caballé, S., Marquès, J.M., Xhafa, F. (eds) Intelligent Collaborative e-Learning Systems and Applications. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 246. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04001-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04001-6_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04000-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04001-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)