Skip to main content

Objective vs. Subjective Evaluation of Speakers with and without Complete Dentures

  • Conference paper
Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5729))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For dento-oral rehabilitation of edentulous (toothless) patients, speech intelligibility is an important criterion. 28 persons read a standardized text once with and once without wearing complete dentures. Six experienced raters evaluated the intelligibility subjectively on a 5-point scale and the voice on the 4-point Roughness-Breathiness-Hoarseness (RBH) scales. Objective evaluation was performed by Support Vector Regression (SVR) on the word accuracy (WA) and word recognition rate (WR) of a speech recognition system, and a set of 95 word based prosodic features. The word accuracy combined with selected prosodic features showed a correlation of up to r = 0.65 to the subjective ratings for patients with dentures and r = 0.72 for patients without dentures. For the RBH scales, however, the average correlation of the feature subsets to the subjective ratings for both types of recordings was r < 0.4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Runte, C., Tawana, D., Dirksen, D., Runte, B., Lamprecht-Dinnesen, A., Bollmann, F., Seifert, E., Danesh, G.: Spectral analysis of /s/ sound with changing angulation of the maxillary central incisors. Int J Prosthodont 15, 254–258 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Molly, L., Nackaerts, O., Vandewiele, K., Manders, E., van Steenberghe, D., Jacobs, R.: Speech adaptation after treatment of full edentulism through immediate-loaded implant protocols. Clin Oral Implants Res 19, 86–90 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Stojcević, I., Carek, A., Buković, D., Hedjever, M.: Influence of the partial denture on the articulation of dental and postalveolar sounds. Coll Antropol 28, 799–807 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Nawka, T., Anders, L.-C., Wendler, J.: Die auditive Beurteilung heiserer Stimmen nach dem RBH-System. Sprache - Stimme - Gehör 18, 130–133 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Stemmer, G.: Modeling Variability in Speech Recognition. Studien zur Mustererkennung, vol. 19. Logos Verlag, Berlin (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wahlster, W. (ed.): Verbmobil: Foundations of Speech-to-Speech Translation. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Haderlein, T.: Automatic Evaluation of Tracheoesophageal Substitute Voices. Studien zur Mustererkennung, vol. 25. Logos Verlag, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Maier, A.: Speech of Children with Cleft Lip and Palate: Automatic Assessment. Studien zur Mustererkennung, vol. 29. Logos Verlag, Berlin (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nöth, E., Batliner, A., Kießling, A., Kompe, R., Niemann, H.: Verbmobil: The Use of Prosody in the Linguistic Components of a Speech Understanding System. IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing 8, 519–532 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen, K., Hasegawa-Johnson, M., Cohen, A., Borys, S., Kim, S.S., Cole, J., Choi, J.Y.: Prosody dependent speech recognition on radio news corpus of American English. IEEE Trans. Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 14, 232–245 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A.: Direct Modeling of Prosody: An Overview of Applications in Automatic Speech Processing. In: Proc. International Conference on Speech Prosody, Nara, Japan, pp. 575–582 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Batliner, A., Buckow, A., Niemann, H., Nöth, E., Warnke, V.: The Prosody Module. In: [6], pp. 106–121.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smola, A., Schölkopf, B.: A Tutorial on Support Vector Regression. Statistics and Computing 14, 199–222 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Witten, I., Frank, E., Trigg, L., Hall, M., Holmes, G., Cunningham, S.: Weka: Practical machine learning tools and techniques with java implementations. In: Proc. ICONIP/ANZIIS/ANNES 1999 Future Directions for Intelligent Systems and Information Sciences, pp. 192–196. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Haderlein, T., Bocklet, T., Maier, A., Nöth, E., Knipfer, C., Stelzle, F. (2009). Objective vs. Subjective Evaluation of Speakers with and without Complete Dentures. In: Matoušek, V., Mautner, P. (eds) Text, Speech and Dialogue. TSD 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5729. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04208-9_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04208-9_26

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04207-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04208-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics