Skip to main content

Immediate Biomechanical Effects of Lumbar Posterior Dynamic Stabilisation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgery for Low Back Pain

Abstract

The current premise, on which spinal fusion is offered to patients with a painful lumbar motion segment, is that the pain arises secondary to abnormal motion or “instability”. By the elimination of this motion, one hopes to eliminate the pain. However, results following spinal fusion are far from predictable, with reported satisfactory clinical results ranging from 46 to 82% [1, 2]. Furthermore, many patients complain of postural or positional pain occurring without motion, suggesting that low back pain may have aetiologies relating to abnormal load transmission rather than abnormal kinematics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wetzel FT, LaRocca SH, Lowery GL (1994) The treatment of lumbar spinal pain syndromes diagnosed by discography: lumbar arthrodesis. Spine 19:792–800

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Thomsen K, Christensen FB, Eiskjaer SP et al (1997) 1997 Volvo Award Winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw insertion on functional outcome and fusion rates in postero-lateral lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective randomised clinical study. Spine 22:2813–2822

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McNally DS, Adams MA (1992) Internal intervertebral disc mechanics as revealed by stress profilometry. Spine 17:66–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moore RJ, Vernon-Roberts B, Fraser RD et al (1996) The origin and fate of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc tissue. Spine 21:2149–2155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. McNally DS, Shackleford IM, Goodship AE et al (1996) In vivo stress measurement can predict pain on discography. Spine 21:2580–2587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulholland RC, Sengupta DK (2002) Rationale, principles and experimental evaluation of the concept of soft stabilisation. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):198–205

    Google Scholar 

  7. Troum OM, Crues JV III (2004) The young adult with hip pain: diagnosis and medical treatment, circa 2004. Clin Orthop 418:9–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nockels RP (2005) Dynamic stabilisation in the surgical management of painful lumbar spinal disorders. Spine 30(Suppl 16):S68–S72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stoll TM, Dubois G, Schwarzenbach O (2002) The dynamic neutralisation system for the spine: a multi-centre study of a novel non-fusion system. Eur Spine J 11(Suppl 2):S170–S178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semi-rigid fixation system for the lumbar spine. Surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30(3):324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Welch WC, Cheng BC, Awad TE et al (2007) Clinical outcomes of the Dynesys dynamic neutralisation system: one-year preliminary results. Neurosurg Focus 22(1):E8:1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T et al (2003) Dynamic stabilisation of the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments. J Spinal Disord Tech 16(4):418–423

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC et al (2006) Biomechanical characterisation of the three-dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilisation system: an in-vitro study. Eur Spine J 15:913–922

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aylott CEW, McKinlay KG, Freeman BJC et al (2005) Dynesys (dynamic neutralisation system for the spine): acute biomechanical effects on the human cadaveric lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg 87B Orthop Proc Suppl III:234

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schmoelz W, Huber JF, Nydegger T et al (2006) Influence of a dynamic stabilisation system on load-bearing of a bridged disc: an in-vitro study of intra-discal pressure. Eur Spine J 15:1276–1285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng BC, Gordon J, Cheng J, Welch WC (2007) Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilisation above a circumferential fusion. Spine 32(23):2551–2557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schulte TL, Hurschler C, Haversath M et al (2008) The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression. Eur Spine J 17:1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian J. C. Freeman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Freeman, B.J.C., Aylott, C.E.W. (2010). Immediate Biomechanical Effects of Lumbar Posterior Dynamic Stabilisation. In: Szpalski, M., Gunzburg, R., Rydevik, B., Le Huec, JC., Mayer, H. (eds) Surgery for Low Back Pain. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04547-9_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04547-9_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04546-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04547-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics