Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

How to Prove Security of a Signature with a Tighter Security Reduction

  • Conference paper
Provable Security (ProvSec 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 5848))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

It is a challenging task to construct a signature that it can be tightly reduced to a weak security assumption in the standard model. In this paper, we introduce a simple chameleon-hash-based transformation and show that it can tighten a security reduction of a signature scheme that suffers from a loose security reduction. Taking the Waters’ signature from Eurocrypt 2005 as an example, we demonstrate an improvement of the security reduction that the probability of success in the security reduction can be made as a constant and independent of the signature queries from an adversary. Our reduction methodology has never been considered in the literature and is applicable to many signature schemes such as identity-based signature schemes, online/offline signatures, and signatures with strong unforeability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boneh, D., Boyen, X.: Short signatures without random oracles. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 56–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boneh, D., Lynn, B., Shacham, H.: Short signatures from the Weil pairing. In: Boyd, C. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2248, pp. 514–532. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Boneh, D., Shen, E., Waters, B.: Strongly unforgeable signatures based on computational diffie-hellman. In: Yung, M., Dodis, Y., Kiayias, A., Malkin, T.G. (eds.) PKC 2006. LNCS, vol. 3958, pp. 229–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cheon, J.H.: Security analysis of the strong diffie-hellman problem. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4004, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Camenisch, J.L., Hohenberger, S., Pedersen, M.: Batch verification of short signatures. In: Naor, M. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4515, pp. 246–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Camenisch, J.L., Lysyanskaya, A.: Signature schemes and anonymous credentials from bilinear maps. In: Franklin, M. (ed.) CRYPTO 2004. LNCS, vol. 3152, pp. 56–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cramer, R., Shoup, V.: Signature schemes based on the strong RSA assumption. ACM Trans. on Information and System Security 3(3), 161–185 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen, X., Zhang, F., Susilo, W., Mu, Y.: Efficient generic online/offline signatures without key exposure. In: Katz, J., Yung, M. (eds.) ACNS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4521, pp. 18–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Even, S., Goldreich, O., Micali, S.: Online/offline digital signatures. In: Brassard, G. (ed.) CRYPTO 1989. LNCS, vol. 435, pp. 263–275. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gentry, C.: Practical identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Vaudenay, S. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4004, pp. 445–464. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gennaro, R., Halevi, S., Rabin, T.: Secure hash-and-sign signatures without the random oracle. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 123–139. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goh, E.J., Jarecki, S.: A signature scheme as secure as the Diffie- Hellman problem. In: Biham, E. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2656, pp. 401–415. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gentry, C., Silverberg, A.: Hierarchical ID-based cryptography. In: Zheng, Y. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2501, pp. 548–566. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Horwitz, J., Lynn, B.: Toward hierarchical identity-based encryption. In: Knudsen, L.R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2332, pp. 466–481. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Hohenberger, S., Waters, B.: Realizing hash-and-sign signatures under Standard Assumptions. In: Joux, A. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5479, pp. 333–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Krawczyk, H., Rabin, T.: Chameleon signatures. In: Symposium on Network and Distributed Systems Security (NDSS 2000), February 2000, pp. 143–154. Internet Society (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Katz, J., Wang, N.: Efficiency improvements for signature schemes with tight security reductions. In: 10th ACM Conf. on Computer and Communications Security, pp. 155–164 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Paterson, K., Schuldt, J.: Efficient identity-based signatures secure in the standard model. In: Batten, L.M., Safavi-Naini, R. (eds.) ACISP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4058, pp. 207–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Shamir, A., Tauman, Y.: Improved online/offline signature schemes. In: Kilian, J. (ed.) CRYPTO 2001. LNCS, vol. 2139, pp. 355–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Waters, B.: Efficient identity-based encryption without random oracles. In: Cramer, R. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3494, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Computer and Information Security Research School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW2522, Australia

    Fuchun Guo, Yi Mu & Willy Susilo

Authors
  1. Fuchun Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yi Mu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Willy Susilo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computing, Macquarie University, 2109, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Josef Pieprzyk

  2. School of Information Science and Technology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510275, Guangzhou, P.R.China

    Fangguo Zhang

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Guo, F., Mu, Y., Susilo, W. (2009). How to Prove Security of a Signature with a Tighter Security Reduction. In: Pieprzyk, J., Zhang, F. (eds) Provable Security. ProvSec 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5848. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04642-1_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04642-1_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04641-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-04642-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation