Skip to main content

On Evaluating Agents for Serious Games

  • Chapter
Agents for Games and Simulations (AGS 2009)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 5920))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the recent upsurge in interest in agents for ‘serious games,’ there has been a focus on the ‘believability’ of agents in these settings. In this paper, I argue that when evaluating agents in this context, believability is often in fact of relatively minor importance, and indeed that focusing on this criteria can detract from the ultimate goals of the games. I present this argument in the context of a project for which the aim was to extend the BDI agent framework to better support human modelling in serious games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bates, J., Loyall, A.B., Reilly, W.S.: An architecture for action, emotion, and social behavior. In: Castelfranchi, C., Werner, E. (eds.) MAAMAW 1992. LNCS, vol. 830. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sawyer, B., Smith, P.: Serious games taxonomy. Presented at the Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA, USA (February 19, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Norling, E.: Modelling Human Behaviour with BDI Agents. PhD thesis, The University of Melbourne (forthcoming, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen, P.R.: Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, P.R.: Heuristic Reasoning about Uncertainty: An Artificial Intelligence Approach. Pitman, London (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Epic Games: Unreal Technology - Unreal Engine 2 (2000–2008), http://www.unrealtechnology.com/features.php?ref=past-versions

  7. Heinze, C.: Modelling Intention Recognition for Intelligent Agent Systems. PhD, The University of Melbourne (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Norling, E., Sonenberg, L., Rönnquist, R.: Enhancing multi-agent based simulation with human-like decision-making strategies. In: Moss, S., Davidsson, P. (eds.) MABS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1979, pp. 214–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Murray, G., Steuart, S., Appla, D., McIlroy, D., Heinze, C., Cross, M., Chandran, A., Raszka, R., Tidhar, G., Rao, A., Pegler, A., Morley, D., Busetta, P.: The challenge of whole air mission modelling. In: Proceedings of the Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Melbourne, Australia (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McIlroy, D., Heinze, C.: Air combat tactics implementation in the Smart Whole AiR Mission Model (SWARMM). In: Proceedings of the First International SimTecT Conference, Melbourne, Australia (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tidhar, G., Heinze, C., Selvestrel, M.: Flying together: Modelling air mission teams. Applied Intelligence 8(3), 195–218 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heinze, C., Goss, S., Josefsson, T., Bennett, K., Waugh, S., Lloyd, I., Murray, G., Oldfield, J.: Interchanging agents and humans in military simulation. AI Magazine 23(2), 37–47 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Watson, M., Lui, F.: Knowledge elicitation and decision-modelling for command agents. In: Palade, V., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L. (eds.) KES 2003. LNCS, vol. 2774, pp. 704–713. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goss, S., Heinze, C., Murray, G., Appla, D.: Agent enabled simulation, modeling and experimentation. In: Proceedings of the Eight International SimTecT Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ritter, F.E., Baxter, G.D., Jones, G., Young, R.M.: Supporting cognitive models as users. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 7(2), 141–173 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Masson, T.: Artificial intelligence – the Q-learning algorithm (2003), http://thierry.masson.free.fr/IA/en/qlearning_about.htm

  17. Ross, K.G., Klein, G.A., Thunholm, P., Schmitt, J.F., Baxter, H.C.: The recognition-primed decision model. Military Review LXXXIV(4), 6–10 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klein, G.A.: A recognition-primed decision (RPD) model of rapid decision making. In: Klein, G.A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., Zsambok, C.E. (eds.) Decision Making in Action: Models and Methods, pp. 138–147. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Greenwich (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Laird, J.E.: It knows what you’re going to do: Adding anticipation to a quakebot. Technical Report SS-00-02, AAAI (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gamebots: Gamebots homepage (2002), http://gamebots.sourceforge.net/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Norling, E. (2009). On Evaluating Agents for Serious Games. In: Dignum, F., Bradshaw, J., Silverman, B., van Doesburg, W. (eds) Agents for Games and Simulations. AGS 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 5920. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11198-3_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11197-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11198-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics