Skip to main content

Porosity and Adhesion in an IPOM Model

  • Chapter
Hernia Repair Sequelae

Abstract

As the advancing laparoscopic techniques for incisional hernia repair depend on meshes suitable for direct contact with the intestine, the search for the ideal mesh for intraabdominal placement continues. In the last decade, much effort has been put into the search for the perfect intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). The main problem in the investigation of meshes is the complexity of adhesion formation and the impossibility of measuring this in the human body without further invasive methods. Several meshes are available that provide some sort of adhesion barrier, but for each of these meshes we have found counterexamples of dense adhesions in our daily clinical routine. In an experimental rat model investigating modern meshes for IPOM repair, Junge et al. found an adhesion area of more than 20% despite the kind of adhesion barrier [4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Conze J, Junge K, Klinge U, Weiss C, Polivoda M, Oettinger AP, Schumpelick V (2005) Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin. Surg Endosc 19:798–803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Conze J, Rosch R, Klinge U, Weiss C, Anurov M, Titkowa S, Oettinger A, Schumpelick V (2004) Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area. Hernia 8:365–372

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Junge K, Binnebosel M, Rosch R, Jansen M, Kammer D, Otto J, Schumpelick V, Klinge U (2009) Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model. Surg Endosc 23:327–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapischke M, Schulz T, Schipper T, Tensfeldt J, Caliebe A (2008) Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: something different from a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:2251–2260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, Piroth C, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2002) Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res 63:765–771

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muhl T, Binnebosel M, Klinge U, Goedderz T (2008) New objective measurement to characterize the porosity of textile implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 84:176–183

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Muller C, Meurer K, Bauer KH, Papapostolou G, Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes—a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Conze, J., Binnebösel, M., Krones, C. (2010). Porosity and Adhesion in an IPOM Model. In: Schumpelick, V., Fitzgibbons, R.J. (eds) Hernia Repair Sequelae. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11541-7_49

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11541-7_49

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04552-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11541-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics