Abstract
As the advancing laparoscopic techniques for incisional hernia repair depend on meshes suitable for direct contact with the intestine, the search for the ideal mesh for intraabdominal placement continues. In the last decade, much effort has been put into the search for the perfect intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM). The main problem in the investigation of meshes is the complexity of adhesion formation and the impossibility of measuring this in the human body without further invasive methods. Several meshes are available that provide some sort of adhesion barrier, but for each of these meshes we have found counterexamples of dense adhesions in our daily clinical routine. In an experimental rat model investigating modern meshes for IPOM repair, Junge et al. found an adhesion area of more than 20% despite the kind of adhesion barrier [4].
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amid PK (1997) Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgery. Hernia 1:15–21
Conze J, Junge K, Klinge U, Weiss C, Polivoda M, Oettinger AP, Schumpelick V (2005) Intraabdominal adhesion formation of polypropylene mesh. Influence of coverage of omentum and polyglactin. Surg Endosc 19:798–803
Conze J, Rosch R, Klinge U, Weiss C, Anurov M, Titkowa S, Oettinger A, Schumpelick V (2004) Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area. Hernia 8:365–372
Junge K, Binnebosel M, Rosch R, Jansen M, Kammer D, Otto J, Schumpelick V, Klinge U (2009) Adhesion formation of a polyvinylidenfluoride/polypropylene mesh for intra-abdominal placement in a rodent animal model. Surg Endosc 23:327–333
Kapischke M, Schulz T, Schipper T, Tensfeldt J, Caliebe A (2008) Open versus laparoscopic incisional hernia repair: something different from a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22:2251–2260
Klinge U, Junge K, Spellerberg B, Piroth C, Klosterhalfen B, Schumpelick V (2002) Do multifilament alloplastic meshes increase the infection rate? Analysis of the polymeric surface, the bacteria adherence, and the in vivo consequences in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res 63:765–771
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, Limberg W, Obolenski B, Ottinger AP, Schumpelick V (1998) Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall. Eur J Surg 164:951–960
Muhl T, Binnebosel M, Klinge U, Goedderz T (2008) New objective measurement to characterize the porosity of textile implants. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 84:176–183
Weyhe D, Belyaev O, Muller C, Meurer K, Bauer KH, Papapostolou G, Uhl W (2007) Improving outcomes in hernia repair by the use of light meshes—a comparison of different implant constructions based on a critical appraisal of the literature. World J Surg 31:234–244
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Conze, J., Binnebösel, M., Krones, C. (2010). Porosity and Adhesion in an IPOM Model. In: Schumpelick, V., Fitzgibbons, R.J. (eds) Hernia Repair Sequelae. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11541-7_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11541-7_49
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-04552-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11541-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)