Skip to main content

Multicriteria Subjective Reputation Management Model

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6086))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The most widely used reputation models assume uniform users’ preference structure. In this paper a new reputation management model is presented. It is focused on aggregation of community wide reputation in situation when agents do not share the same preference structure. The reputation is interpreted as vectors of attributes that represent several reputation evaluation criteria. Outcomes of the criteria are transformed by the utility functions and assigned subjective probabilities so that the subjective expected utility values can be obtained. Subjective expected utilities are further aggregated by the weighted ordered weighted average (WOWA) operator. The expressive power of subjective utilities concept along with the WOWA aggregation technique provides the reputation management system with a capability to model various preference structures. It is shown with an illustrative example.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aringhieri, R., Damiani, E., De Capitani Di Vimercati, S., Paraboschi, S., Samarati, P.: Fuzzy techniques for trust and reputation management in anonymous peer-to-peer systems. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57, 528–537 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Damiani, E., De Capitani Vimercati, S., Samarati, P., Viviani, M.: A WOWA-based Aggregation Technique on Trust Values Connected to Metadata. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science 157, 131–142 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. De Finetti, B.: Foresight: its logical laws in subjective sources. In: Studies in Subjective Probability, pp. 93–158 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebay Inc.: http://www.ebay.com

  5. Filev, D., Yager, R.R.: On the issue of obtaining OWA operator weights. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 94, 157–169 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hajek, A.: Interpretations of Probability. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Josang, A., Ismail, R., Boyd, C.: A Survey of Trust and Reputation Systems for Online Service Provision. Decision Support Systems 43, 618–644 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee, K., Hwang, K., Lee, J., Kim, H.J.: A Fuzzy Trust Model Using Multiple Evaluation Criteria. In: Wang, L., Jiao, L., Shi, G., Li, X., Liu, J. (eds.) FSKD 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4223, pp. 961–969. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ogryczak, W.: Ordered weighted enhancement of preference modeling in the reference point method for multiple criteria optimization. Soft Computing 14, 435–450 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ogryczak, W., Kozłowski, B.: Reference point method with importance weighted ordered partial achievements. TOP (2009), Springer Online First doi:10.1007/s11750-009-0121-4

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ogryczak, W., Śliwiński, T.: On Efficient WOWA Optimization for Decision Support under Risk. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 50, 915–928 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Ramsey, F.P.: Truth and probability. The Foundations of Mathematics and other Logical Essays 7, 156–198 (1926)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Resnick, P., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E., Kuwabara, K.: Reputation Systems. Communications of the ACM 43, 45–48 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Savage, L.J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Torra, V.: The Weighted OWA Operator. International Journal of Inteligent Systems 12, 153–166 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Torra, V., Narukawa, Y.: Modeling Decisions: Information Fusion and Aggregation Operators. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wierzbicki, A.P.: Reference point approaches. In: Gal, T., Stewart, T., Hanne, T. (eds.) Multicriteria Decision Making: Advances in MCDM Models, Algorithms, Theory, and Applications, pp. 9.1–9.39. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decisionmaking. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Majdan, M., Ogryczak, W. (2010). Multicriteria Subjective Reputation Management Model. In: Szczuka, M., Kryszkiewicz, M., Ramanna, S., Jensen, R., Hu, Q. (eds) Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing. RSCTC 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6086. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13529-3_72

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13528-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13529-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics