Abstract
Until recently, information was recorded in analog form. Early cave paintings may be the oldest known examples of information recording in analog form. The only way to copy a cave painting was to create another painting, close to the original. This situation continued for a long time until the development of the pantograph, an instrument that allows fairly accurate copying of planar line drawings. The subsequent invention of black and white photography provided the ability to faithfully copy images, beyond those of lines on a planar surface. The ability to produce color photographs extended the domain of images to color. Exceptions notwithstanding, in each of these cases, it was unlikely that a copy would have be mistaken for the original. This was due to the fact that it was virtually impossible to capture the precise value of any element in the original analog image. Further, the original and its copy would generally employ different materials.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The preceding overview excludes consideration of text, which is digital.
References
McLuhan, M. (1967). Understanding media: The extensions of man. Great Britain: Penguin Books.
Diffie, W., & Landau, S. (2009). Privacy and security at risk. Communications of the ACM, 52(11), 47–52.
US Supreme Court. (1984). Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, 464 U.S. 417. Technical report.
US Congress. (1998). The Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Statutory Provisions (17 U.S.C. 1201(k)). Technical report.
Jefferson, T. (1813, August 13). Letter to Isaac McPherson. Technical report.
US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Docket No. 00-9185, Argued: May 1, 2001, Decided: November 28, 2001. Technical report, 2001.
Copy Protection Technical Working Group. Private conversation in the hallway at a meeting.
Retrieved from http://www.cptwg.org/
Cinea. (2002, October 9). Cinea announced it was awarded a $2M grant from national Institute of Science and Technology to develop its anti-piracy technology to prevent digital camera capture of movies.
Kraus, D. (2001, November 5). The Phantom Edit, Salon.com. Retrieved from http://dir.salon.com/ent/movies/feature/2001/11/05/phantom_edit/index.html
Official Journal C 180 of 25/06/99. Amended proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the Information Society. COM (1999) 250 final of 21/05/99.
FCC Press Release. FCC EXPLORES DIGITAL BROADCAST COPY, 8 August 2002.
Mori, R. et al. (1990). Superdistribution: The concept and the architecture. Transactions of the IEICE, Tokyo, E73(7), 1133–1146.
US Department of Commerce. (2001, December 4). Press Release. http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/releases/g01-111.htm
AES. AES Homepage on the National Institute of Standards and Technology website. Retrieved from http://csrc.nist.gov/CryptoToolkit/aes/
Goldberger, I, & Wagner, D. (1996, January). Randomness and the Netscape Browser. Dr. Dobb’s Journal, pp 66–70.
San Jose Division United States District Court for the Northen District of California. United States of America v. Elcom Ltd., a/k/a Elcomsoft Co., Ltd. and Dmitry Sklyarov, Case No.: CR 01-20138 RMW. Technical report.
The pseudonym of the author Screamer. Retrieved from http://cryptome.org/
Retrieved from http://www.dvdcca.org/faq.html
Retrieved from http://www.macrovision.com/solutions/video/copyprotect/index.php3
WAEA Specification 0598. Retrieved from http://www.macrovision.com/solutions/video/copyprotect/index.php3
Attanasio, C. R. (1973). Virtual machines and data security. Proceedings of the Workshop on Virtual Computer Systems, Cambridge, MA.
Schneck, P. B. (1999, July). Persistent access control to prevent piracy of digital information. Proceedings of the IEEE (pp. 1239–1250).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneck, P. (2011). Restricting Anti-Circumvention Devices. In: Ghosh, S., Turrini, E. (eds) Cybercrimes: A Multidisciplinary Analysis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13547-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13547-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13546-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13547-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)