Skip to main content

Answer Diversification for Complex Question Answering on the Web

  • Conference paper
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6118))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present a novel graph ranking model to extract a diverse set of answers for complex questions via random walks over a negative-edge graph. We assign a negative sign to edge weights in an answer graph to model the redundancy relation among the answer nodes. Negative edges can be thought of as the propagation of negative endorsements or disapprovals which is used to penalize factual redundancy. As the ranking proceeds, the initial score of the answer node, given by its relevancy to the specific question, will be adjusted according to a long-term negative endorsement from other answer nodes. We empirically evaluate the effectiveness of our method by conducting a comprehensive experiment on two distinct complex question answering data sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Achananuparp, P., Yang, C.C., Chen, X.: Using Negative Voting to Diversify Answers in Non-Factoid Question Answering. In: Proc. of CIKM 2009, Hong Kong (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Gollapaudi, S., Halverson, A., Ieong, S.: Diversifying Search Results. In: Proc. of WSDM 2009, pp. 5–14 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allan, J., Wade, C., Bolivar, A.: Retrieval and novelty detection at the sentence level. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2003, pp. 314–321. ACM, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Brin, S., Page, L.: The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1-7) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carbonell, J., Goldstein, J.: The Use of MMR, Diversity-Based Reranking for Reordering Documents and Producing Summaries. In: Proc. of SIGIR 1998, pp. 335–336 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, S.Y., Huang, M.L., Lu, Z.Y.: Summarizing Documents by Measuring the Importance of a Subset of Vertices within a Graph. In: Proc. of WI 2009 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, C.L., Kolla, M., Cormack, G.V., Vechtomova, O., Ashkan, A., Büttcher, S., MacKinnon, I.: Novelty and diversity in information retrieval evaluation. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2008, pp. 659–666 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Kerchove, C., Dooren, P.V.: The PageTrust algorithm: how to rank web pages when negative links are allowed? In: Proc. SDM 2008, pp. 346–352 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jurczyk, P., Agichtein, E.: Discovering authorities in question answer communities by using link analysis. In: Proc. of CIKM 2007, Lisbon, Portugal, November 6-10 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly, D., Lin, J.: Overview of the TREC 2006 ciQA Task. SIGIR Forum 41(1), 107–116 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kunegis, J., Lommatzsch, A., Bauckhage, C.: The Slashdot zoo: Mining a social network with negative edges. In: Proc. of WWW 2009, pp. 741–750 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, L., Xue, G.R., Zha, H., Yu, Y.: Enhancing Diversity, Coverage and Balance for Summarization through Structure Learning. In: Proc. of WWW 2009, pp. 71–80 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, J.: Is Question Answering Better Than Information Retrieval? Toward a Task-Based Evaluation Framework for Question Series. In: Proc. of NAACL HLT 2007, Rochester, NY, pp. 212–219 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, J., Demner-Fushman, D.: Automatically Evaluating Answers to Definition Questions. In: Proc. of HLT/EMNLP, Vancouver, pp. 931–938 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, Y., Bian, J., Agichtein, E.: Predicting Information Seeker Satisfaction in Community Question Answering. In: Proc. of SIGIR 2008, Singapore, July 20-24 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MacKinnon, I., Vechtomova, O.: Improving Complex Interactive Question Answering with Wikipedia Anchor Text. In: Macdonald, C., Ounis, I., Plachouras, V., Ruthven, I., White, R.W. (eds.) ECIR 2008. LNCS, vol. 4956, pp. 438–445. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Nenkova, A., Vanderwende, L.: The impact of frequency on summarization. MSR-TR-2005-101 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Otterbacher, Erkan, G., Radev, D.R.: Using Random Walks for Question-focused Sentence Retrieval. In: Proc. of the HLT/EMNLP 2006, Vancouver, pp. 915–922 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Suryanto, M.A., Lim, E.P., Sun, A., Chiang, R.H.: Quality-aware collaborative question answering: methods and evaluation. In: Proc. of WSDM 2009, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 142–151 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zhu, X., Goldberg, A., Van Gael, J., Andrzejewski, D.: Improving Diversity in Ranking using Absorbing Random Walks. In: Proc. of NAACL-HLT 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Achananuparp, P., Hu, X., He, T., Yang, C.C., An, Y., Guo, L. (2010). Answer Diversification for Complex Question Answering on the Web. In: Zaki, M.J., Yu, J.X., Ravindran, B., Pudi, V. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6118. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13657-3_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13657-3_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13656-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13657-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics