Skip to main content

Improved Detection of Cancer in Screening Mammograms by Temporal Comparison

  • Conference paper
Digital Mammography (IWDM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6136))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A method is presented for including information from the preceeding mammogram in a scheme for automatically detecting malignant masses in screening mammograms. The method circumvents the inherent difficulty of registering temporal mammograms by replacing image registration by graph matching. The scheme incorporates a single image mass detection algorithm and so the contribution of the temporal analysis can be measured. At a true detection rate of 80 percent, the single image scheme results in 1.02 false positive detections per image while the temporal scheme results in 0.96 false positives. At 90 percent true detection, the false positive rates per image are 1.84 and 1.63 respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Eltonsy, N.H., Tourassi, G.D., Elmaghraby, A.S.: A concentric morphology model for the detection of masses in mammography. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 26(06), 880–889 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hadjiiski, L., Sahiner, B., Chan, H.-P., Petrick, N., Helvie, M.A., Gurcan, M.: Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: Computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses. Medical Physics 28(11), 2309–2317 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hasegawa, A., Neemuchwala, H., Tsunoda-Shimizu, H., Honda, S., Shimura, K., Sato, M., Koyama, T., Kikuchi, M., Hiramatsu, S.: A tool for temporal comparison of mammograms: Image toggling and dense-tissue-preserving registration. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 447–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Hong, B.-W., Brady, M.: A topographic representation for mammogram segmentation. In: Ellis, R.E., Peters, T.M. (eds.) MICCAI 2003. LNCS, vol. 2879, pp. 730–737. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jolion, J.M., Montanvert, A.: The adaptive pyramid: A framework for 2d image analysis. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing 55(3), 339–348 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Krissinel, E.B., Henrick, K.: Common subgraph isomorphism detection by backtracking search. Softw. Pract. Exper. 34, 591–607 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ma, F., Bajger, M., Bottema, M.J.: Temporal analysis of mammograms based on graph matching. In: Krupinski, E.A. (ed.) IWDM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5116, pp. 158–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, F., Bajger, M., Bottema, M.J.: Automatic mass segmentation based on adaptive pyramid and sublevel set analysis. In: DICTA 2009, Melbourne, Australia. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marias, K., Behrenbruch, C., Parbhoo, S., Seifalian, A., Brady, M.: A registration framework for the comparison of mammogram sequences. IEEE Transactions on Medical Image Analysis 24(6), 782–790 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Miyajima, K., Ralescu, A.: Spatial organization in 2d segmented images: Representation and recognition of primitive spatial relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 65(2-3), 225–236 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Richard, F.J.P., Cohen, L.D.: A new image registration technique with free boundary constraints: application to mammography. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 89, 166–196 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Sanay-Gopal, S., Chan, H.-P., Wilson, T., Helvie, M., Petrick, N., Sahiner, B.: A regional registration technique for automated interval change analysis of breast lesions on mammograms. Medical Physics 26(12), 2669–2679 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shiffman, S., Rubin, G.D., Napel, S.: Medical image segmentation using analysis of isolable-contour maps. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 19(11), 1064–1074 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Timp, S., Karssemeijer, N.: Interval change analysis to improve computer aided detection in mammography. Medical Image Analysis 10, 82–95 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Engeland, S., Snoerten, P., Hendriks, J., Karssemeijer, N.: A comparison of methods for mammogram registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22(11), 1436–1444 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ma, F., Bajger, M., Williams, S., Bottema, M.J. (2010). Improved Detection of Cancer in Screening Mammograms by Temporal Comparison. In: Martí, J., Oliver, A., Freixenet, J., Martí, R. (eds) Digital Mammography. IWDM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_101

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13666-5_101

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-13665-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-13666-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics