Skip to main content

B and D Are Enough to Make the Halpern–Shoham Logic Undecidable

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6199))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Halpern–Shoham logic is a modal logic of time intervals. Some effort has been put in last ten years to classify fragments of this beautiful logic with respect to decidability of its satisfiability problem. We contribute to this effort by showing (among other results), that the BD fragment (where only the operators “begins” and “during” are allowed) is undecidable over discrete structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Communications of the ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Montanari, A., Puppis, G., Sala, P.: A decidable spatial logic with cone-shaped cardinal directions. In: Grädel, E., Kahle, R. (eds.) CSL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5771, pp. 394–408. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bresolin, D., Della Monica, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Decidable and Undecidable Fragments of Halpern and Shoham’s Interval Temporal Logic: Towards a Complete Classification. In: Cervesato, I., Veith, H., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5330, pp. 590–604. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bresolin, D., DellaMonica, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Undecidability of Interval Temporal Logics with the Overlap Modality. In: Proc. of 16th International Symposium on Temporal Representation and Reasoning - TIME 2009, pp. 88–95. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bresolin, D., DellaMonica, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Undecidability of the Logic of Overlap Relation over Discrete Linear Orderings. In: Proceedings of M4M 6: 6th Workshop on Methods for Modalities (November 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sala, P.: Tableau-based decision procedures for the logics of subinterval structures over dense orderings. Journal of Logic and Computation 20(1), 133–166 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bresolin, D., Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: Propositional Interval Neighborhood Logics: Expressiveness, Decidability, and Undecidable Extensions. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 161(3), 289–304 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Bresolin, D., Montanari, A., Sala, P., Sciavicco, G.: Optimal Tableaux for Right Propositional Neighborhood Logic over Linear Orders. In: Hölldobler, S., Lutz, C., Wansing, H. (eds.) JELIA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5293, pp. 62–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Goranko, V., Montanari, A., Sciavicco, G.: A road map of interval temporal logics and duration calculi. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 14(1-2), 9–54 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamblin, C.L.: Instants and intervals. Studium Generale 27, 127–134 (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Halpern, J., Shoham, Y.: A propositional modal logic of time intervals. Journal of the ACM 38(4), 935–962 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Lodaya, K.: Sharpening the undecidability of interval temporal logic. In: He, J., Sato, M. (eds.) ASIAN 2000. LNCS, vol. 1961, pp. 290–298. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Moszkowski, B.C.: Reasoning about Digital Circuits. PhD thesis, Stanford University, Computer Science Department (July 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Montanari, A., Puppis, G., Sala, P., Sciavicco, G.: Decidability of the Interval Temporal Logic AB\(\bar{B}\) on Natural Numbers. In: Proc. of the 27th Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Computer Science (STACS 2010), pp. 597–608 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parikh, R.: A decidability result for second order process logic. In: Proc. 19th FOCS, pp. 177–183. IEEE, Los Alamitos (October 1978)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pnueli, A.: A temporal logic of programs. In: Proc. 18th FOCS, pp. 46–57. IEEE, Los Alamitos (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pratt, V.R.: Process logic. In: Proc. 6th POPL, pp. 93–100. ACM, New York (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Prior, A.N.: Past, Present and Future. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1967)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marcinkowski, J., Michaliszyn, J., Kieroński, E. (2010). B and D Are Enough to Make the Halpern–Shoham Logic Undecidable. In: Abramsky, S., Gavoille, C., Kirchner, C., Meyer auf der Heide, F., Spirakis, P.G. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6199. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14162-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14162-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14161-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14162-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics