Abstract
Although concept maps have been found to be effective in science education research, these are critiqued for being informal due to informal usage of relation and attribute names thereby resulting in ambiguity. Refined concept mapping, a development over the regular concept mapping is an approach towards introducing rigor and parsimony in representing knowledge. The method proposed suggests to substitute the ambiguous relation names with well-defined relation names to concepts consistently while mapping a domain. We suggest the use of this method for introducing rigor in concept mapping and position it among the other models of knowledge representation in an inverse semantic spectrum.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mintzes, J.J., Wandersee, J., Novak, J.D. (eds.): Teaching Science for Understanding– A Human Constructivist View. Academic Press, USA (1998)
Sowa, J.: Concept mapping. Talk Presented at the AERA Conference, San Francisco (2006), http://www.jfsowa.com/talks/cmapping.pdf
Kremer, R.: A Concept Mapping Tool to Handle Multiple Formalisms. In: Proceedings of AAAI Spring Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management, pp. 86–93 (1997), http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Symposia/Spring/1997/SS-97-01/SS97-01-016.pdf
Canas, A.J., Carvalho, M.: Concept Maps and AI: An Unlikely Marriage? In: Proceedings of SBIE: Simposio Brasileiro de Informatica Educativa, Manaus, Brasil (2004)
Kharatmal, M., Nagarjuna, G.: A Proposal to Refine Concept Mapping for Effective Science Learning. In: Canas, A.J., Novak, J.D. (eds.) Concept Maps: Theory, Methodology, Technology. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Concept Mapping, San Jose, Costa Rica (2006)
Sowa, J.: Conceptual Structures: Information Processing in Mind and Machine. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, USA (1984)
The Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies, http://www.obofoundry.org
The OBO Relation Ontology, http://www.obofoundry.org/ro/
Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Kohler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A., Rosse, C.: Relations in Biomedical Ontologies. Genome Biology 6(5) (2005), http://genomebiology.com/2005/6/5/R46
Winston, M., Chaffin, R., Herrman, D.: A Taxonomy of Part-Whole Relations. Cognitive Science 11, 417–444 (1987)
Brachman, R.: What IS-A Is and Isn’t: An Analysis of Taxonomic Links in Semantic Networks. IEEE Computer 16(10), 30–36 (1983)
Kharatmal, M., Nagarjuna, G.: Exploring Roots of Rigor: A Proposal of a Methodology for Analyzing the Conceptual Change from a Novice to an Expert. In: Canas, A.J., Reiska, P., Ahlberg, M., Novak, J.D. (eds.) Concept Mapping: Connecting Educators. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Concept Mapping, Tallinn, Estonia & Helsinki, Finland (2008)
Kharatmal, M., Nagarjuna, G.: Refined Concept Maps for Science Education–A Feasibility Study. In: epiSTEME 3 Third International Conference on Review of Science, Technology and Mathematics Education, Mumbai, India (2009)
Quine, W.: From a Logical Point of View. In: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays. Harvard University Press, USA (1953)
Brewer, W., Samarapungavan, A.: Children’s Theories vs. Scientific Theories: Differences in Reasoning or Differences in Knowledge? In: Hoffman, Palermo (eds.) Cognition and the Symbolic Processes: Applied and Ecological Perspectives, pp. 209–232. Erlbaum, New Jersey (1991)
Karmiloff-Smith, A.: Beyond Modularity: A Developmental Perspective on Cognitive Science. MIT Press, USA (1995)
Nagarjuna, G.: Layers in the Fabric of Mind: A Critical Review of Cognitive Ontogeny. In: Ramadas, J., Chunawala, S. (eds.) Research Trends in Science, Technology and Mathematics Education. Homi Bhabha Centre for Science Education, Mumbai (2006)
McGuinness, D.: Ontologies Come of Age. In: Fensel, D., Hendler, J., Lieberman, J., Wahlster, W. (eds.) Spinning the Semantic Web: Bringing the World Wide Web to Its Full Potential. MIT Press, USA (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kharatmal, M., Nagarjuna, G. (2010). Introducing Rigor in Concept Maps. In: Croitoru, M., Ferré, S., Lukose, D. (eds) Conceptual Structures: From Information to Intelligence. ICCS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6208. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14197-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14197-3_22
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14196-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14197-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)