Skip to main content

Building Teachers’ TPACK through WebQuest Development and Blended Learning Process

  • Conference paper
Hybrid Learning (ICHL 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6248))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Integrating technology in K-12 classroom is a complex challenge for teachers. This article provides an overview on the conceptualization of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK), project-based learning and WebQuests, and blended learning. It presents how an instructional approach which incorporated WebQuest development and blended learning process is implemented into one educational technology course at a university in the northeastern region of the United States. The effectiveness of such an instructional approach on TPACK among participants of the course has been confirmed in this study. Discussion and conclusion of building a stronger pre- and in-service teachers’ TPACK for educational technology courses are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cuban, L.: Oversold and Underused: Computer in the Classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pflaum, W.: The Technology Fix. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hofer, M., Swan, K.O.: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Action: A Case Study of a Middle School Digital Documentary Project. J. Research on Technology in Education 41, 179–200 (2008/2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yang, H., Shindler, J., Keen, A.: Minds On, Hands On: The Linear-Nonlinear Problem-Solving Approach to a Multimedia and Internet Course. In: Willis, D., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2000, pp. 738–743. AACE, Chesapeake (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cooper, P.A., Hirtle, J.S.: A Constructivist Approach to Technology Literacy for Preservice Teachers. In: Proceedings of SITE, San Antonio (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. TPCK – Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, http://www.tpck.org/

  7. Wheatley, G.: Constructivist Perspectives on Science and Mathematics Learning. Science Education 75, 9–21 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Grabe, M., Grabe, C.: Integrating Technology for Meaningful Learning, 5th edn. Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Creating a WebQuest: It’s Easier than You Think, http://www.educationworld.com/a_tech/tech/tech011.shtml

  10. Dodge, B.: Some Thoughts About WebQuests, http://webquest.sdsu.edu/about_webquests.html

  11. Watson, K.L.: WebQuests in the Middle School Curriculum: Promoting Technological Literacy in the Classroom. Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies J, 2 (1999), http://www.ncsu.edu/meridian/jul99/webquest/index.html

  12. Beane, J.A.: Curriculum Integration Designing the Core of Democratic Education. Teachers College Press, New York (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang, H., Pun, S.W.: Beliefs and Concept Mapping on WebQuest Development. In: Kidd, T., Song, H. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Instructional System & Technology, pp. 272–286. Idea Globe, Hershey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J.: Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A New Framework for Teacher Knowledge. Teachers College Record 108(6), 1017–1054 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Graham, C.R.: The Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In: Bonk, C.J., Graham, C.R. (eds.) Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local designs. Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Young, J.R.: “Hybrid” Teaching Seeks to End the Divide between Traditional and Online Instruction. Chronicle of Higher Education A33 (March 22, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rooney, J.E.: Blending Learning Opportunities to Enhance Educational Programming and Meetings. Association Management 55(5), 26–32 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, H., Yuen, S.C.-Y.: Collective Intelligence and E-Learning 2.0: Implications of Web-Based Communities and Networking. IGI Global, Hershey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Abdullah, M.H.: Self-Directed Learning, http://www.indiana.edu/~reading/ieo/digests/d169.html

  20. Bolhuis, S.: Towards Active and Selfdirected Learning. Preparing for Lifelong Learning, with Reference to Dutch Secondary Education. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Temple, C., Rodero, M.L.: Active Learning in a Democratic Classroom: The Pedagogical Invariants of Celestin Freinet (Reading around the World). Reading Teacher, pp. 164–167 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garrison, D.R.: Self-Directed Learning: Toward a Comprehensive Model. Adult Education Quarterly 48(1), 18–33 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hunt Jr., Lyman, C.: The Effect of Self-Selection, Interest, and Motivation upon Independent, Instructional, and Frustrational Levels. Reading Teacher 50(4), 278–282 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Taylor, B.: Self-Directed Learning: Revisiting an Idea Most Appropriate for Middle School Students. Paper Presented at the Combined Meeting of the Great Lakes and Southeast International Reading Association, Nashville (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Guthrie, J.T., Solomon, A., Rinehart, J.M.: Engagement in Reading for Young Adolescents. J. of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 40(6), 438–446 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Barron, B.J.S., Schwartz, D.L., Vye, N.J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., Bransford, J.D.: The Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt: Doing with Understanding: Lessons from Research on Problem- and Project-Based Learning. J. of the Learning Sciences 7(3&4), 271–311 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang, H.: Mission Possible: Project-Based Learning Preparing Graduate Students for Technology. In: Price, J., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2001, pp. 2855–2857. AACE, Chesapeake (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Shin, T.: Survey of Preservice Teachers’ Knowledge of Teaching and Technology, http://mkoehler.educ.msu.edu/unprotected_readings/TPACK_Survey/Schmidt_et_al_Survey_v1.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, H.H., Chen, P. (2010). Building Teachers’ TPACK through WebQuest Development and Blended Learning Process. In: Tsang, P., Cheung, S.K.S., Lee, V.S.K., Huang, R. (eds) Hybrid Learning. ICHL 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6248. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14657-2_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14656-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14657-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics