Skip to main content

How Information Technology Can Support Family Law and Mediation

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 57))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In Australia, before a divorcing couple can have their case heard by the Family Court, they must undertake mediation. Thus it is useful to develop information technology tools to support negotiation and mediation in family law. Most negotiation support systems focus upon integrative bargaining. In doing so, they tend to ignore issues of fairness. In Australian Family Law, the interests of the children, as opposed to those of their parents/guardians, are paramount. We investigate the use of providing BATNAs and integrative bargaining in providing family mediation decision support. The discussion is highlighted with examples taken from the domain of Australian Family Law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abrahams, B., Bellucci, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Incorporating Fairness into Development of an Integrated Multi-agent Online Dispute Resolution. Submitted to Group Decision and Negotiation Journal (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Astor, H., Chinkin, C.M.: Dispute resolution in Australia, 2nd edn. LexisNexis Butterworths, Sydney (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bellucci, E.: Developing Compensation Strategies for the construction of Negotiation Decision Support Systems. PHD thesis, La Trobe University, Bundoora 3086, Victoria, Australia (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bellucci, E.: AssetDivider: A New Mediation Tool in Australian Family Law. In: Hindriks, K.V., Brinkman, W.-P. (eds.) Proceedings of the First International Working Conference on Human Factors and Computational Models in Negotiation, pp. 11–18. Delft University of Technology, Delft (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bellucci, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Family-Negotiator: an intelligent decision support system for negotiation in Australian Family Law. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Conference of the International Society for Decision Support Systems, Lausanne, pp. 359–373 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bellucci, E., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing Negotiation Decision Support Systems that support mediators: a case study of the Family_Winner system. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Law 13(2), 233–271 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brams, S.J., Taylor, A.D.: Fair Division, from cake cutting to dispute resolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chandar, S., Zeleznikow, J.: Risks To Consider When Negotiating IT Outsourcing Agreements. In: Proceedings of GDN 2009, the 10th Annual Meeting INFORMS Section on Group Decision and Negotiation, Toronto, Ontario, June 14-17 (2009), http://info.wlu.ca/~wwwmath/faculty/kilgour/gdn/papers.htm (last accessed August 26, 2009)

  9. Conley Tyler, M., McPherson, M.: Online Dispute Resolution and Family Disputes. Journal of Family Studies 12(2), 165–184 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisen, J.: Are We Ready for Mediation in Cyberspace? Byu L. Rev. 1305, 1322–1325 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fisher, R., Ury, W.: Getting to YES: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving In. Haughton Mifflin, Boston (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gray, P., Gray, X., Zeleznikow, J.: Decision Negotiating Logic: For richer or poorer. In: Winkels, R. (ed.) Proceedings of Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 247–251. ACM Press, Palo Alto (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Hall, M.J.J., Zeleznikow, J.: A method for evaluating legal knowledge-based systems based upon the Context Criteria Contingency guidelines framework. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, pp. 274–283. ACM Press, Edinburgh (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Jennings, N.R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A.R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Sierra, C.: Automated negotiation: Prospects, methods and challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation 10, 199–215 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karamon, M.: ADR on the Internet, 11 OHIO ST. J. on Disp. Resol., 537–548 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kersten, G.E.: Support for Group Decisions and Negotiations. In: Climaco, J. (ed.) An Overview, in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Support. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kersten, G.E.: Modeling Distributive and Integrative Negotiations. Review and Revised Characterization. Group Decision and Negotiation 10(6), 493–514 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kolodner, J.L., Simpson, R.L.: The Mediator: Analysis of an Early Case-Based Problem Solver. Cognitive Science 13, 507–549 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multi-Agent Environments. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lax, D.A., Sebenius, J.: The Manager as Negotiator. The Free Press, New York (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lodder, A., Zeleznikow, J.: Developing an Online Dispute Resolution Environment: Dialogue Tools and Negotiation Systems in a Three Step Model. The Harvard Negotiation Law Review 10, 287–338 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Matwin, S., Szpakowicz, S., Koperczak, Z., Kersten, G.E., Michalowski, G.: NEGOPLAN: An Expert System Shell for Negotiation Support. IEEE Expert 4(4), 50–62 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peterson, M., Waterman, D.A.: Evaluating civil claims: An expert systems approach to evaluating liability cases. In: Walter, C. (ed.) Computer Power and Legal Reasoning, pp. 627–659. West Publishing Company, St. Paul (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ross, H.: Settled Out of Court, Aldine (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50, 97–109 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stranieri, A., Zeleznikow, J., Gawler, M., Lewis, B.: A hybrid—neural approach to the automation of legal reasoning in the discretionary domain of family law in Australia. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7(2-3), 153–183 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sycara, K.: Negotiation planning: An AI approach. European Journal of Operations Research 46, 216–234 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sycara, K.: Machine Learning for Intelligent Support of Conflict Resolution. Decision Support Systems 10, 121–136 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Thiessen, E.M., McMahon, J.P.: Beyond Win-Win in Cyberspace. Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution 15, 643 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thomson, M.: Annual Report of the Telephone Dispute Resolution Service to the Attorney General. Relationships Australia, Queensland (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Van Velthoven, B.C.J., Ter Voert, M.J.: Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2003. WODC/Boom, The Hague (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walton, R.E., Mckersie, R.B.: A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations. McGraw-Hill, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Waterman, D.A., Paul, J., Peterson, M.: Expert systems for legal decision making. Expert Systems 3(4), 212–226 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Wertheim, E., Love, A., Littlefield, L., Peck, C.I.: Win: You Win Penguin Books, pp. 130–135. Ringwood, Victoria (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wilkenfeld, J., Kraus, S., Holley, K.M., Harris, M.A.: GENIE: A decision support system for crisis negotiations. Decision Support Systems 14, 369–391 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Williams, G.: Legal Negotiation and Settlement. West Publishing Co., St. Paul (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wooldridge, M.: Agent-Based Software Engineering. IEE Proc. Software Engineering 144(1), 26–37 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zeleznikow, J., Bellucci, E.: Family_Mediator - adding notions of fairness to those of interests. In: Proceedings of Nineteenth International Conference on Legal Knowledge Based System, pp. 121–130. IOS Publications, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Zeleznikow, J., Meersman, R., Hunter, D., van Helvoort, E.: Computer tools for aiding legal negotiation. In: ACIS’95 — Sixth Australasian Conference on Information Systems, pp. 231–251. Curtin University of Technology, Perth (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bellucci, E., Macfarlane, D., Zeleznikow, J. (2010). How Information Technology Can Support Family Law and Mediation. In: Abramowicz, W., Tolksdorf, R., Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 57. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15402-7_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15401-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15402-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics