Skip to main content

Automatic Configuration of Multi-Objective ACO Algorithms

  • Conference paper
Swarm Intelligence (ANTS 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6234))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the last few years a significant number of ant colony optimization (ACO) algorithms have been proposed for tackling multi-objective optimization problems. In this paper, we propose a software framework that allows to instantiate the most prominent multi-objective ACO (MOACO) algorithms. More importantly, the flexibility of this MOACO framework allows the application of automatic algorithm configuration techniques. The experimental results presented in this paper show that such an automatic configuration of MOACO algorithms is highly desirable, given that our automatically configured algorithms clearly outperform the best performing MOACO algorithms that have been proposed in the literature. As far as we are aware, this paper is also the first to apply automatic algorithm configuration techniques to multi-objective stochastic local search algorithms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alaya, I., Solnon, C., Ghédira, K.: Ant colony optimization for multi-objective optimization problems. In: 19th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence (ICTAI 2007), vol. 1, pp. 450–457. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Barán, B., Schaerer, M.: A multiobjective ant colony system for vehicle routing problem with time windows. In: Proceedings of the Twenty first IASTED International Conference on Applied Informatics, Insbruck, Austria, pp. 97–102 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartz-Beielstein, T., Chiarandini, M., Paquete, L., Preuß, M. (eds.): Experimental Methods for the Analysis of Optimization Algorithms. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Birattari, M., Yuan, Z., Balaprakash, P., Stützle, T.: F-race and iterated F-race: An overview. In: Bartz-Beielstein, et al [3] (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Doerner, K.F., Gutjahr, W.J., Hartl, R.F., Strauss, C., Stummer, C.: Pareto ant colony optimization: A metaheuristic approach to multiobjective portfolio selection. Annals of Operations Research 131, 79–99 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Doerner, K.F., Hartl, R.F., Reimann, M.: Are CompetAnts more competent for problem solving? The case of a multiple objective transportation problem. Central European Journal for Operations Research and Economics 11(2), 115–141 (2003)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dorigo, M., Stützle, T.: Ant Colony Optimization. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. García-Martínez, C., Cordón, O., Herrera, F.: A taxonomy and an empirical analysis of multiple objective ant colony optimization algorithms for the bi-criteria TSP. European Journal of Operational Research 180(1), 116–148 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Grunert da Fonseca, V., Fonseca, C.M., Hall, A.O.: Inferential performance assessment of stochastic optimisers and the attainment function. In: Zitzler, et al [19], pp. 213–225

    Google Scholar 

  10. Iredi, S., Merkle, D., Middendorf, M.: Bi-criterion optimization with multi colony ant algorithms. In: Zitzler, et al [19], pp. 359–372

    Google Scholar 

  11. KhudaBukhsh, A.R., Xu, L., Hoos, H.H., Leyton-Brown, K.: SATenstein: Automatically building local search SAT solvers from components. In: Proc. of the Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2009), pp. 517–524 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. López-Ibáñez, M., Paquete, L., Stützle, T.: On the design of ACO for the biobjective quadratic assignment problem. In: Dorigo, M., Birattari, M., Blum, C., Gambardella, L.M., Mondada, F., Stützle, T. (eds.) ANTS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3172, pp. 214–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. López-Ibáñez, M., Paquete, L., Stützle, T.: Hybrid population-based algorithms for the bi-objective quadratic assignment problem. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Algorithms 5(1), 111–137 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. López-Ibáñez, M., Paquete, L., Stützle, T.: Exploratory analysis of stochastic local search algorithms in biobjective optimization. In: Bartz-Beielstein, et al [3], 209–233

    Google Scholar 

  15. López-Ibáñez, M., Stützle, T.: The impact of design choices of multi-objective ant colony optimization algorithms on performance: An experimental study on the biobjective TSP. In: GECCO 2010, pp. 71–78. ACM Press, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. López-Ibáñez, M., Stützle, T.: An analysis of algorithmic components for multiobjective ant colony optimization: A case study on the biobjective TSP. In: Collet, P., Legrand, P. (eds.) EA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5975, pp. 134–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mariano, C.E., Morales, E.: MOAQ: An Ant-Q algorithm for multiple objective optimization problems. In: Banzhaf, W., Daida, J., Eiben, A.E., Garzon, M.H., Honavar, V., Jakiela, M., Smith, R.E. (eds.) Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 1999), vol. 1, pp. 894–901. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Stützle, T., Hoos, H.H.: \(\mathcal{MAX -MIN}\). Future Generation Computer Systems 16(8), 889–914 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zitzler, E., Deb, K., Thiele, L., Coello, C.A., Corne, D. (eds.): EMO 2001. LNCS, vol. 1993. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zitzler, E., Laumanns, M., Thiele, L.: SPEA2: Improving the strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm for multiobjective optimization. In: Giannakoglou, K., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of EUROGEN 2001, International Center for Numerical Methods in Engineering (CIMNE), pp. 95–100 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Fonseca, C.M., Grunert da Fonseca, V.: Performance assessment of multiobjective optimizers: an analysis and review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 7(2), 117–132 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

López-Ibáñez, M., Stützle, T. (2010). Automatic Configuration of Multi-Objective ACO Algorithms. In: Dorigo, M., et al. Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6234. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15461-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15461-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15460-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15461-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics