Skip to main content

Business Process Modelling and Workflow Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Conceptual Modeling

Abstract

Detailed knowledge about the structure and functionality of a business process within an enterprise is of utter importance for a thorough understanding of organizational sequences. This is a crucial requirement in business process management (BPM) and business process re-engineering (BPR), which cover the entire process lifecycle, from modeling and design, to execution, monitoring, and optimization. Throughout this lifecycle, process models are required to represent an enterprise’s processes, so that they can be documented, communicated, verified, simulated, analyzed, automated, evaluated, or improved. This chapter provides an overview of business process modeling and workflow design, discusses their commonalities and differences, explains how different process perspectives aremodeled, and gives an overview of several business process modeling related research topics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.boc-group.com.

  2. 2.

    BPMN meta model download available at http://www.bpmn.org.

  3. 3.

    The Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC, www.wfmc.org) is a global organization that creates and contributes to process related standards.

  4. 4.

    http://www.workflowpatterns.com.

  5. 5.

    http://www.workflowpatterns.com.

  6. 6.

    http://www.activevos.com.

  7. 7.

    http://bpt.hpi.uni-potsdam.de.

  8. 8.

    http://help.sap.com.

  9. 9.

    http://www.workflowpatterns.com.

  10. 10.

    Arbitrary cycles are possible in languages with GOTO-statements; which allows jumps from any point to any other point in the process.

References

  1. Workflow Management Coalition (1999) Terminology & Glossary. http://www.WfMC.org, document number WFMC-TC-1001

  2. White S (2004) Introduction to BPMN. http://www.BPMN.org

  3. Workflow Management Coalition (1995) The Workflow Reference Model. http://www.WfMC.org, document number TC00-1003

  4. Bussler C, Jablonski S (1996) Workflow Management: Modeling Concepts, Architecture and Implementation. International Thomson Computer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zur Muehlen M (2002) Workflow-based Process Controlling. Logos, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gruber W (2004) Modeling and Transformation of Workflows with Temporal Constraints. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knutilla A et al. (1998) Process Specification Language: An Analysis of Existing Representations. US National Institute for Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mentzas G, Halaris C, Kavadias S (2001) Modelling business processes with workflow systems: an evaluation of alternative approaches. Int J Inf Manag 21(2):123–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Groiss H (2001) Business Process Management with @enterprise. @enterprise course material. http://www.groiss.com

  10. Workflow Management Coalition (1999) Interface 1: Process Definition Interchange – Process Model. http://www.Wfmc.org, document number TC00-1016-P

  11. Workflow Management Coalition (2005) Workflow Process Definition Interface – XML Process Definition Language (XPDL). http://www.Wfmc.org, document number WFMC-TC-1025

  12. Object Management Group (2009) Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Document number: formal/2009-01-03, http://www.OMG.org

  13. Barreto C et al. (2009) OASIS Web Services Business Process Execution Language (WSBPEL). http://www.aasis.org

  14. Marjanovic O (2001) Methodological considerations for time Modeling in workflows. In: Proceedings of the twelfth Australasian conference on information systems, Coffs Harbour, December 2001

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kiepuszewski B (2002) Expressiveness and suitability of languages for control flow modelling in workflows. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van der Aalst WMP et al. (2003) Workflow patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 14(3):5–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sadiq W, Orlowska ME (1999) Applying graph reduction techniques for identifying structural conflicts in process models. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on advanced information systems engineering CAiSE June 1999, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kiepuszewski B et al. (2003) Fundamentals of control flow in workflows. Acta Inform 39(3):143–209

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Van der Aalst, WMP (1997) Verification of workflow nets. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on application and theory of Petri nets. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1248:407–426

    Google Scholar 

  20. Verbeek H et al. (1999) Diagnosing workflow processes using Woflan. Comput J 44(4)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muehlen MZ (2004) Organizational management in workflow applications–issues and perspectives. Inform Technol Manag 5(3-4)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Russell N et al. (2005) Workflow resource patterns: identification, representation and tool support. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3520:216–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lehmann M (2006) Data Access in Workflow Management Systems. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  24. Russell N et al. (2005) Workflow data patterns: identification, representation and tool support. Proceedings of 24th international conference on conceptual modeling ER 2005. Lect Notes Comput Sci 3716:353–368

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jablonski S, Goetz M (2008) Perspective oriented business process visualization. Business process management workshops. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4928:144-155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chebbia I, Dustdar S, Tataa S (2006) The view-based approach to dynamic inter-organizational workflow cooperation. Data Knowl Engineer 56(2)56:139–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tahamtan NA (2009) Modeling and verification of web service composition based interorganizational workflows. PhD thesis, University of Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  28. Eder J, Panagos E (2001) Managing time in workflow systems. In: Workflow Handbook 2001, Future Strategies Inc. Workflow Management Coalition (WfMC): 109–132

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eder J, Pichler H (2002) Duration Histograms for Workflow Systems. In: IFIP conference proceedings, Kanazawa

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Horst Pichler or Johann Eder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pichler, H., Eder, J. (2011). Business Process Modelling and Workflow Design. In: Embley, D., Thalheim, B. (eds) Handbook of Conceptual Modeling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15865-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15865-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15864-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15865-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics