Skip to main content

Scenario Process as a Community for Organizational Knowledge Creation and Sharing

  • Conference paper
Knowledge Discovery, Knowlege Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2009)

Abstract

Uncertainty and radical changes in the environment challenge decision makers in modern organizations. Knowledge of the past and present and also the insights from the future form the necessary conditions for successful decision making. Knowledge of the present can be used to create knowledge about the future through the scenario process. The paper presents two case studies, which support the proposition that the scenario process supports creation of knowledge in organizations. The scenario process can be a community and thus can offer not only artifacts of knowledge, but also a venue where decisions can be rehearsed and evaluated against plausible futures. We arrive to the conclusion that the scenario process can support knowledge sharing and creation, while it makes the assumptions of the organization explicit through the scenarios and also results in projection of plausible futures to come.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amin, A., Roberts, J.: Knowing in action, beyond communities of practice. Research Policy 37, 353–369 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bergman, J.-P.: Supporting Knowledge Creation and Sharing in the Early Phases of the Strategic Innovation Process. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaesis 212. Lappeenranta University of Technology, FI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bishop, P., Hines, A., Collins, T.: The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight 9(1), 5–25 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blanning, R.W., Reinig, B.A.: A Framework for Conducting Political Event Analysis Using Group Support Systems. Decision Support Systems 38, 511–527 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation. In: Cohen, M.D., Sproull, L.S. (eds.) Organizational Learning, pp. 58–82. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science 12(2), 198–213 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J.S., Duguid, P.: Structure and Spontaneity: Knowledge and Organization. In: Nonaka, I., Teece, D. (eds.) Managing Industrial Knowledge, pp. 44–67. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlile, P., Rebentisch, E.S.: Into the Black Box: The Knowledge Transformation Cycle. Management Science 49(9), 1180–1195 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chermack, T.J.: Improving Decision-Making with Scenario Planning. Futures 36, 295–309 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chermack, T.J., van der Merwe, L.: The role of constructivist learning in scenario planning. Futures 35, 445–460 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cook, S.D.N., Brown, J.S.: Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance Between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing. Organization Science 10(4), 381–400 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Emery, J.C.: Organizational Planning and Control Systems, Theory and Technology. Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc., New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fjermestad, J., Hiltz, S.R.: Group Support Systems: A Descriptive Evaluation of Case and Field Studies. Journal of Management Information Systems 17(3), 115–159 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gammelgaard, J., Ritter, T.: Virtual Communities of Practice: A Mechanism for Efficient Knowledge Retrieval in MNCs. International Journal of Knowledge Management 4(2), 46–51 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jennex, M.E., Olfman, L.: A Model of Knowledge Management Success. International Journal of Knowledge Management 2(3), 51–68 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kahn, H., Wiener, A.J.: The Year 2000: A Framework for Speculation on the Next Thirty-Three Years. Collier-Macmillan Ltd., London (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kimble, C., Hildred, P., Wright, P.: Communities of Practice: Going Virtual. In: Malhotra, Y. (ed.) Knowledge Management and Business Model Innovation, pp. 220–234. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kivijärvi, H.: Aligning Knowledge and Business Strategies within an Artificial Ba. In: Abou-Zeid, E.-S. (ed.) Knowledge Management and Business Strategies: Theoretical Frameworks and Empirical Research. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kivijärvi, H., Piirainen, K., Tuominen, M., Elfvengren, K., Kortelainen, S.: A Support System for the Strategic Scenario Process. In: Adam, F., Humphreys, P. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Decision Making and Decision Support Technologies, pp. 822–836. Idea Group Inc., Hershey (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kokkonen, K., Piirainen, K., Kässi, T.: E-business opportunities in the Finnish forest sector – a multi-method scenario study. In: The Proceedings of XVIII International Conference of International Society for Professional Innovation Management, Tours, France (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Lesser, E., Everest, K.: Using Communities of Practice to Manage Intellectual Capital. Ivey Business Journal 65(4), 37–41 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leonard, D., Sensiper, S.: The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation. California Management Review 40(3), 112–132 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nunamaker Jr., J.F., Briggs, R.O., Mittleman, D.D., Vogel, D.R., Balthazard, P.A.: Lessons from a Dozen Years of Group Support Systems Research: A Discussion of Lab and Field Findings. Journal of Management Information Systems 13(3), 163–207 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Piirainen, K., Tuominen, M., Elfvengren, K., Kortelainen, S., Niemistö, V.-P.: Developing Support for Scenario Process: A Scenario Study on Lappeenranta University of Technology from 2006 to 2016, Research report 182. Lappeenranta University of Technology, Lappeenranta (2007), http://urn.fi/ URN:ISBN:978-952-214-369-3

  26. Piirainen, K., Kortelainen, S., Elfvengren, K., Tuominen, M.: A scenario approach for assessing new business concepts. Management Research Review 33(6), 635–655 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Piirainen, K., Lindqvist, A.: Enhancing business and technology foresight with electronically mediated scenario process. Foresight 12(2), 16–37 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Polanyi, M.: Personal Knowledge. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Polanyi, M.: The Tacit Dimension. Doubleday & Company Inc., Reprinted Peter Smith, Gloucester (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Schwartz, P.: The Art of the Long View: Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. Doubleday Dell Publishing Inc., New York (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Simon, H.A.: The New Science of Management Decisions. Harper Brothers, New York (1960)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Swan, J., Scarborough, H., Robertson, M.: The Construction of ‘Communities of Practice’ in the Management of Innovation. Management Learning 33(4), 477–496 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tsoukas, H., Vladimirou, E.: What is Organizational Knowledge? Journal of Management Studies 38(7), 973–993 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an Information Systems Design Theory for Vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright, G., van der Heijden, K., Burt, G., Bradfield, R., Cairns, G.: Scenario Planning Interventions in Organizations: An analysis of the causes of success and failure. Futures 40, 218–236 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zeleny, M.: Human Systems Management: Integrating Knowledge, Management and Systems. World Scientific Publishing, Singapore (2005)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kivijärvi, H., Piirainen, K.A., Tuominen, M. (2011). Scenario Process as a Community for Organizational Knowledge Creation and Sharing. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds) Knowledge Discovery, Knowlege Engineering and Knowledge Management. IC3K 2009. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 128. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19032-2_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19032-2_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19031-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19032-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics