Skip to main content

Micromechanical Modeling of Three-dimensional Open-cell Foams

  • Chapter
Advances in Soft Matter Mechanics

Abstract

Two micromechanics models for three-dimensional (3-D) opencell foams are presented. In the first model, an energy method based on Castigliano’s second theorem is utilized. The analysis is performed on a tetrakaidecahedral unit cell, which is subjected to compression on its two opposite square faces. The thirty-six struts of the unit cell are treated as uniform slender beams undergoing linearly elastic deformations, and the twenty-four vertices as rigid joints. All three deformation mechanisms of the cell struts (i.e., stretching, shearing and bending) possible under the specified loading are incorporated, and four different strut cross section shapes (i.e., circle, square, equilateral triangle and Plateau border) are treated in a unified manner, unlike in earlier models. Two closed-form formulas for determining the effective Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of open-cell foams are provided. These two formulas are derived by using the composite homogenization theory and contain more parameters than those included in existing models. The new formulas explicitly show that the elastic properties of the foam depend on the relative foam density, the shape and size of the strut cross section, and the Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the strut material. The predicted values of the effective Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio for carbon foams compare favorably with those based on existing models and experimental data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hilyard N C. Mechanics of Cellular Plastics. Applied Science, London, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gibson L J, Ashby M F. Cellular Solids: Structures and Properties. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashby M F, Evans A, Fleck N A, et al. Metal Foams: A Design Guide. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn (MA), 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall R B, Hager J W. Performance limits for stiffness-critical graphitic foam structures, part I: Comparisons with high-modulus foams, refractory alloys and graphite-epoxy composites. J Compos Mater, 30: 1922–1937, 1996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roy A K, Pullman D, Kearns K M. Experimental methods for measuring tensile and shear stiffness and strength of graphitic foam. Proceedings of the 43rd International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Anaheim, California, USA, May 31–June 4, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sihn S, Roy A K. Modeling and stress analysis of open-cell carbon foam. Proceedings of the 46th International SAMPE Symposium and Exhibition, Long Beach, CA, USA, May 6–10, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Warren W E, Kraynik A M. The linear elastic properties of open-cell foams. ASME J Appl Mech, 55: 341–346, 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Warren W E, Kraynik A M. The linear elastic behavior of a low-density Kelvin foam with open cells. ASME J Appl Mech, 64: 787–795, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson D P, Kearns K M, Klett J W, et al. Microcellular graphite carbon foams for next generation structures and thermal management. Proceedings of the 2000 IEEE Aerospace Conference, Vol. 4, Big Sky, Montana, USA, March 18–25, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weaire D, Fortes M A. Stress and strain in liquid and solid foams. Adv Phys, 43: 685–738, 1994.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Dement’ev A G, Tarakanov O G. Effect of cellular structure on the mechanical properties of plastic foams. Polymer Mechanics, 6: 519–525, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dement’ev A G, Tarakanov O G. Model analysis of the cellular structure of plastic foams of the polyurethane type. Polymer Mechanics, 6: 744–749, 1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Choi J B, Lakes R S. Analysis of elastic modulus of conventional foams and of re-entrant foam materials with a negative Poisson’s ratio. Int J Mech Sci, 37: 51–59, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Chou T W. Microstructural Design of Fiber Composites. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Van der Burg M W D, Shulmeister V, Van der Geissen E, et al. On the linear elastic properties of regular and random open-cell foam models. J Cell Plastics, 33: 31–54, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Grenestedt J L, Tanaka K. Influence of cell shape variations on elastic stiffness of closed cell cellular solids. Script Mater, 40: 71–77, 1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts A P, Garboczi E J. Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids. Acta Mater, 49: 189–197, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roberts A P, Garboczi E J. Elastic properties of model random threedimensional open-cell solids. J Mech Phys Solids, 50: 33–55, 2002.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Grenestedt J L, Bassinet F. Influence of cell wall thickness variations on elastic stiffness of closed-cell cellular solids. Int J Mech Sci, 42: 1327–1338, 2000.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Simone A E, Gibson L J. Effects of solid distribution on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Mater, 46: 2139–2150, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Simone A E, Gibson L J. The effects of cell face curvature and corrugations on the stiffness and strength of metallic foams. Acta Mater, 46: 3929–3935, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grenestedt J L. Influence of wavy imperfections in cell walls on elastic stiffness of cellular solids. J Mech Phys Solids, 46: 29–50, 1998.

    Article  ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao X L, Mall S. Variational solution for a cracked mosaic model of woven fabric composites. Int J Solids Struct, 38: 855–874, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Roy A K, Sihn S. Development of a three-dimensional mixed variational model for woven composites I: mathematical formulation. Int J Solids Struct, 38: 5935–5947, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao X L, Li K. Damaged mosaic laminate model of woven fabric composites with transverse yarn cracking and interface debonding. Compos Sci Tech, 62: 1821–1834, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gao X L, Li K, Mall S. A mechanics-of-materials model for predicting Young’s modulus of damaged woven fabric composites involving three damage modes. Int J Solids Struct, 40: 981–999, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook R D, Young W C. Advanced Mechanics of Materials. 2nd ed. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (NJ), 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hashin Z. Analysis of composite materials-a survey. ASME J Appl Mech, 50: 481–505, 1983.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Hashin Z. Analysis of orthogonally cracked laminates under tension. ASME J Appl Mech, 54: 872–879, 1987.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Glaessgen E H, Phillips D R, Iesulauro E, et al. A multiscale approach to modeling fracture in metallic materials containing nonmetallic inclusions. AIAA-2003-1616, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nygards M, Gudmundson P. Three-dimensional periodic Voronoi grain models and micromechanical FE-simulations of a two-phase steel. Comp Mater Sci, 24: 513–519, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hibbitt, Karlson, Sorenson, Inc. ABAQUS Theory and User’s Manuals. Version 6.3. Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson, Inc., Pawtucket, RI, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Li K, Gao X L, Roy A K. Micromechanics model for three-dimensional opencell foams using a tetrakaidecahedral unit cell and Castigliano’s second theorem. Compos Sci Tech, 63: 1769–1781, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Li K, Gao X L, Roy A K. Micromechanical analysis of three-dimensional opencell foams using the matrix method for spatial frames. Composites: Part B, 36: 249–262, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Silva M J, Hayes W C, Gibson L J. The effects of non-periodic microstructure on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Mech Sci, 37: 1161–1177, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Silva M J, Gibson L J. The effects of non-periodic microstructure and defects on the compressive strength of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Mech Sci, 39: 549–563, 1997.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Li K, Gao X L, Subhash G. Effects of cell shape and cell wall thickness variations on the elastic properties of two-dimensional cellular solids. Int J Solids Struc, 42: 1777–1795, 2005.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Laroussi M, Sab K, Alaoui A. Foam mechanics: nonlinear response of an elastic 3D-periodic microstructure. Int J Solids Struc, 39: 3599–3623, 2002.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Kanit T, Forest S, Galliet I, et al. Determination of the size of the representative volume element for random composites: Statistical and numerical approach. Int J Solids Struc, 40: 3647–3679, 2003.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Higher Education Press, Beijing and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Li, K., Gao, XL. (2012). Micromechanical Modeling of Three-dimensional Open-cell Foams. In: Advances in Soft Matter Mechanics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19373-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics