Abstract
The combined adjustment of GPS/Levelling observations on benchmarks with gravimetric geoid heights has been the focus of extensive research both from the theoretical and practical point of view. Up until today, with few exceptions, the main blame for the inconsistencies/disagreement between these three types of heights has been put to the geoid heights due mainly to their poorer accuracy. With the advent of the new CHAMP- and GRACE-based global geopotential models and the realization of EGM2008 the achievable cumulative geoid accuracy has improved significantly so that its differences to GPS/Levelling heights reach the few cm level. In Greece, GPS observations on BMs are very scarce and cover only small parts, in terms of spatial scale, of the country. Recently, an effort has been carried out to perform new GPS measurements on levelling BMs, so that reliable GPS/Levelling and gravimetric geoid height adjustment studies can be carried out. This resulted in part of North-Western Greece to be covered with reliable observations within an area extending 3° in longitude and 1° in latitude. Therefore, some new potential for the common adjustment of the available geometric, orthometric and geoid heights, using various parametric surfaces to model and interpret their differences, are offered. These are used to come to some conclusions on the accuracy of the various geoid models used (both global geopotential and local gravimetric models), while an extensive outlook is paid to the questionable behaviour of the orthometric heights. The latter is especially important for the Greek territory since the available benchmarks are delaminated in so-called “map-leaflets” and a common adjustment of the entire vertical network has not been carried out so far. It is concluded that even between neighbouring “map-leaflets” large biases in the adjusted GPS/Levelling and gravimetric geoid heights exist, which indicates distortions in the Greek vertical datum as this is realized by the levelling benchmarks. Given that the latter are commonly used for everyday surveying purposes, conclusions and proposals on the determination of adjusted orthometric heights are finally drawn.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Featherstone W (1998) Do we need a gravimetric geoid or a model of the Australian height datum to transform GPS Heights in Australia? Austr Survey 43(4):273–280
Featherstone WE, Kirby JF, Kearsley AHW, Gilliand JR, Johnston J, Steed R, Forsberg R, Sideris MG (2001) The AUSGeoid98 geoid model of Australia: data treatment, computations and comparisons with GPS/levelling data. J Geod 75(5–6):313–330
Fotopoulos G (2003) An analysis on the optimal combination of geoid, orthometric and ellipsoidal height data. UCGE Rep Nr 20185, Calgary AB, Canada
Fotopoulos G, Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (2001) How accurately can we determine orthometric height differences from GPS and geoid data? J Surv Eng 129(1):1–10
Kotsakis C, Sideris MG (1999) On the adjustment of combined GPS/levelling/geoid networks. J Geod 73(8):412–421
Lemoine GG, KenyonSX, Factim JK, Trimmer RG, Pavlis NK, Chinn DS, Cox CM, Klosko SM, Luthcke SB, Torrence MH, Wang YM, Williamson RG, Pavlis EC, Rapp H, Olson TR (1998) The development of the joint NASA GSFC and the National Imagery and Mapping Agency (NIMA) Geopotential Model EGM 96. Pub. Goddard Space Flight Center
Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An Earth Gravitational Model to Degree 2160: EGM2008, presented at the 2008 General Assembly of the European Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria, April 13–18, 2008
Reigber Ch, Jochmann H, Wünsch J, Petrovic S, Schwintzer P, Barthelmes F, Neumayer KH, König R, Förste Ch, Balmino G, Biancale R, Lemoine JM, Loyer S, Perosanz F (2005) Earth gravity field and seasonal variability from CHAMP. In: Reigber Ch, Luhr H, Schwintzer P, Wickert J (eds) Earth observation with CHAMP: results from three years in orbit. Springer, Berlin, pp 25–30
Sideris MG, Mainville A, Forsberg R (1992) Geoid testing using GPS and levelling (or GPS testing using levelling and the geoid?). Aust J Geod, Photogramm Surv 57:62–77
Tapley B, Ries J, Bettadpur S, Chambers D, Cheng M, Condi F, Poole S (2007) The GGM03 mean earth gravity model from GRACE. Eos Trans. AGU 88(52), Fall Meet Suppl, Abstract G42A-03
Tziavos IN, Vergos GS, Grigoriadis VN (2010) Investigation of topographic reductions and aliasing effects to gravity and the geoid over Greece based on various digital terrain models. Surv Geophs 31(1):23–67. doi:10.1007/s10712-009-9085-z
Vergos GS, Sideris MG (2002) Evaluation of geoid models and validation of geoid and GPS/levelling undulations in Canada. IGeS Bull 12:3–17
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tziavos, I.N., Vergos, G.S., Grigoriadis, V.N., Andritsanos, V.D. (2012). Adjustment of Collocated GPS, Geoid and Orthometric Height Observations in Greece. Geoid or Orthometric Height Improvement?. In: Kenyon, S., Pacino, M., Marti, U. (eds) Geodesy for Planet Earth. International Association of Geodesy Symposia, vol 136. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_58
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20338-1_58
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20337-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20338-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)