Skip to main content

General Issues on the Structure of Banking Industry

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Economics of Bank Bankruptcy Law
  • 1001 Accesses

Abstract

We now explore the main critiques of the general bank regulatory framework and suggest necessary reforms that can address the specific aspects of bank bankruptcy. We first address prudential regulation in banking. Second, we analyze whether systemically important public infrastructure can be separated from the rest of the banking system. Third, we analyze the rationale for netting, and last of all we propose how to contain systemic repercussions caused by the closeout netting provisions of derivative contracts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Adrian and Brunnermeier (2010) propose macroprudential regulation based on CoVaR measure of interconnectedness between financial institutions. CoVaR measures the value-at-risk of the financial system. In particular, the contribution of an individual institution towards systemic risk is defined as the difference between the CoVaR in the case of the financial institutionā€™s distress and the CoVaR in the case of a normal state of the financial institution.

  2. 2.

    In this light one may understand the main role of the European Systemic Risk Board (the newly built EU body for systemic risk mitigation), which is making informed proposals that others (regulators or policymakers) should implement. However, the ESRB is not independent from banking regulators. See Section 6.3 for further discussion.

  3. 3.

    Sjostrom (2009) describes the AIG failure and its subsequent bailout. Ayotte and Skeel (2010) describe the Lehman Brothers failure.

  4. 4.

    Kahn and Roberds (1998), Lamfalussy Report (Lamfalussy 1990).

  5. 5.

    Baer et al. (1996).

  6. 6.

    In the EU, Directive 98/26/EC precludes insolvency proceedings from having retroactive effects (see European Parliament and Council 1998). The amendments in Directive 2009/44/EC have been proposed to deal with increasing interlinkages between multiple payment systems that may increase systemic risk in the financial system (see European Parliament and Council 2009 and Weber and Gruenewald 2009 for discussion).

  7. 7.

    Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, JP Morgan Chase, and other investment banks and dealers extensively used this market to fund themselves before the onset of the credit crisis in 2007.

  8. 8.

    In some countries, the set-offs are widely applicable to every contract and not only to bank contracts (Bergman et al. 2003).

  9. 9.

    Ivashina and Scharfstein (2010) show that corporations had drained their credit lines when the 2007ā€“2009 financial crisis started.

  10. 10.

    House Rep. No. 97ā€“420, 97th Cong., 2nd Sess., 3 (1982). The amendments to the Bankruptcy code in 2005 increased the privileges of derivative contracts from a limited number of contracts (e.g., Treasury repos and a few futures contracts) to a wide range of financial contracts such as secured financial credit (e.g., repurchase agreement). In the EU, the main directives dealing with financial collateral are the EU Financial Collateral Directive of 6 June 2002 (OJ L 168/43) and the EU Settlement Finality Directive of 19 May 1998, but these were subsequently amended several times (by Directive 2009/44/EC of 6 May 2009 and Directive 2002/47/EC).

References

  • Acharya, V., Schnabl, P. & Suarez, G. (2010). Securitization without risk transfer, NBER working paper 15730

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Acharya, V., Gujral, I. & Shin, H.-S. (2010). Dividends and Bank Capital in the Financial Crisis of 2007ā€“09, forthcoming, Journal of Applied Corporate Finance.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Admati, A. R., DeMarzo, P. M., Hellwig, M. F., & Pfeiderer, P. C. (2010). Fallacies, irrelevant facts, and myths in the discussion of capital regulation: Why bank equity is not expensive (Working Paper 86). Rock Center for Corporate Governance at Stanford University.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Adrian, T., & Brunnermeier, M. K. (2010, November 1). CoVaR (Working Paper).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Altman, E. I., Ć–ncĆ¼, T. S., Richardson, M., Schmeits, A., & White, L. J. (2011). Regulation of rating agencies. In V. Acharya, T. Cooley, M. Richardson, & I. Walter (Eds.), Regulating wall street: The Dodd-Frank Act and the new architecture of global finance (pp. 443ā€“468). New Jersey: Wiley.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ayotte, K., & Skeel, D. A. (2010). Bankruptcy or bailouts? Journal of Corporation Law, 35, 469ā€“498.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Baer, H., France, V., & Moser, J. (1996). Opportunity cost and prudentiality: An analysis of future clearinghouse behavior (Working Paper 96ā€“01). University of Illinois.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bank for International Settlement. (2010). Semiannual OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2010. http://www.bis.org/statistics/otcder/dt1920a.pdf

  • Barth, J. R., Gerard, C., Jr., & Levine, R. (2011, forthcoming). Guardians of finance: How to make them work for us. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Beck, T., Coyle, D., Dewatripont, M., Freixas, X., & Seabright, P. (2010). Bailing out the banks: Reconciling stability and competition. an analysis of state-support schemes for financial institutions (Working Paper). Tilburg: European Banking Center.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bergman, W., Bliss, R., Johnson, C., & Kaufman, G. (2003). Netting, financial contracts, and banks: The economic implications. In G. Kaufman (Ed.), Market discipline in banking: Theory and evidence, vol. 15 of Research in financial services (pp. 303ā€“334). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press.

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Bliss, R. R., & Kaufman, G. G. (2006). Derivatives and systemic risk: Netting collateral, and closeout. Journal of Financial Stability, 2, 55ā€“70.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Brunnermeier, M. K., Crockett, A,. Goodhart, C., Persaud, A., & Shin, H. (2009). The fundamental principles of financial regulation. Geneva Reports on the World Economy, 11

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Calomiris, C., & Mason, J. (2004). Credit card securitization and regulatory arbitrage, Journal of Financial Services Research, 26(1), 5ā€“27.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Chan-Lau, J. A. (2010). Regulatory capital charges for too-connected-to-fail institutions: A practical proposal. Financial Markets Institutions & Instruments, 19(5), 355ā€“376.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Cont, R., & Minca, A. (2009). CDS and systemic risk, Working Paper, Columbia University.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • De Jonghe, O. (2010). Back to basics in banking? A micro-analysis of banking system stability, Journal of Financial Intermediation, 19(3), 387ā€“417

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Demirguc, K. A., & Huizinga, H. (2009). Bank activity and funding strategies (CentER Working Paper).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Duffie, D. (2010). The failure mechanics of dealer banks. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 51ā€“72.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Duffie, D., & Zhu, H. (2009, July 1) Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? (Working Paper). Stanford University.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Edwards, F. R., & Morrison, E. R. (2005). Derivatives and the bankruptcy code: Why the special treatment? Yale Journal on Regulation, 22(1), 91ā€“122.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • European Parliament and Council (1998). Directive 98/26/EC on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems. Retrieved May 1998, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:1998:166:0045:0050:EN:PDF

  • European Parliament and Council. (2009, May 6). Directive 2009/44/EC Amending the Settlement Finality Directive and the Financial Collateral Arrangements Directive. Brussels: European Parliament and Council. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2009:146:0037:0043:EN:PDF

  • Freixas, X. (2010). Post-crisis challenges to bank regulation. Economic Policy, 25, 375ā€“399.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Goodhart, C. A. E. (2006). A framework for assessing financial stability? Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(12), 3415ā€“3422.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Huang, X., Zhou, H., & Zhu, H. (2009). A framework for assessing the systemic risk of major financial institutions, Journal of Banking and Finance, 33(11), 2036ā€“2049

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Ivashina, V., & Scharfstein, D. S. (2010). Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008, RFE, 97(3), 319ā€“338

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kahn, C., & Roberds, W. (1998). Payment system settlement and bank incentives. The Review of Financial Studies, 11(4), 845ā€“870.

    ArticleĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  • Kashyap, A. K, Rajan, R.G., & Stein, J.C. (2008). Rethinking capital regulation, in Maintaining stability in a changing financial system (pp. 431ā€“471). Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Laeven, L., & Levine, R. (2009). Bank governance, regulation, and risk-taking, Journal of Financial Economics, 93(2), 259ā€“275.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Lamfalussy Report. (1990). Committee on payment and settlement systems, 1990.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Levine, R. (2010, November). The Governance of financial regulation: Reform lessons from the recent crisis (BIS Working Papers 329).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Partnoy, F., & Skeel, D. A. (2007). The promise and perils of credit derivatives. University of Cincinnati Law Review, 75, 1019ā€“1051.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Perotti, E., & Suarez, J. (2009). Liquidity insurance for systemic crises (Policy insight, CEPR, 31).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Repullo, R., Saurian, J., & Trucharte, C. (2009). Mitigating the procyclicality of Basel II. In M. Dewatripont, X. Freixas, & R. Portes (Eds.), Macroeconomic stability and financial regulation, key issues for the G20 (pp. 105ā€“112). London: CEPR and VoxEU.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Saurina, J. (2009). Loan loss provisions in Spain. A working macroprudential tool. Estabilidad Financiera, 17, 11ā€“26.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Singh, M. (2010). Collateral, netting and systemic risk in the OTC derivatives market (IMF Working Paper 10/99).

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Sjostrom, W. K. (2009). The AIG bailout. Washington and Lee Law Review, 66(3), 943ā€“991.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Vasser, S. (2005). Derivatives in bankruptcy. Business Lawyer, 60(4), 1507ā€“1542.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  • Weber, R. H., & Gruenewald, S. (2009). Settlement finality and financial collateral directives: Ignored but crucial in financial turmoil. Butterworths Journal of International Banking and Financial Law, 24, 70ā€“73.

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matej MarinĨ .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

MarinĨ, M., Vlahu, R. (2012). General Issues on the Structure of Banking Industry. In: The Economics of Bank Bankruptcy Law. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21807-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21807-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21806-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21807-1

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics