Skip to main content

Sustainable Agriculture, Food Security, and Socio-Economic Risks in Ukraine

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Managing Safety of Heterogeneous Systems

Abstract

In Ukraine, the growth of intensive agricultural enterprises that focus on fast profits contribute considerably to food insecurity and increasing socio-economic and environmental risks. Ukraine has important natural and labor resources for effective rural development; more than 50% of food production is still contributed by small and medium farms, despite the difficulties associated with economic instabilities and the lack of proper policy support. Currently, the main issue for the agro-policy is to use these resources in a sustainable way, enforcing robust long term development of rural communities and agriculture. In this chapter, we introduce a stochastic, geographically explicit model for designing forward-looking policies regarding robust resources allocation and composition of agricultural production, in order to enhance food security and rural development. In particular, we investigate the role of investments into rural facilities to stabilize and enhance the performance of the agrofood sector in view of uncertainties and incomplete information. The security goals are introduced in the form of multidimensional risk indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Agriholdings in Ukraine: Good or Bad? German–Ukrainian Policy Dialogue in Agriculture. Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting, Policy Paper Series AgPP No 21, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agriculture at a Crossroads. IAASTD (International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development) Global Report. UNDP, UNEP, UNESCO, World Bank, WHO, Global Environment Facility. Copyright ©2009 IAASTD. Island Press, address- Street1718 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Suite 300, Washington, DC PostalCode20009. HD1428.I544 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow, K. J., & Fisher, A. C. (1974). Preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88, 312–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borodina, O. (2009). Food Security and Socioeconomic Aspects of Sustainable Rural Development in Ukraine. Interim Report IR-09-053, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Laxenburg, Austria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borodina, O. (2007). Applying Historical Precedent to a New Conventional Wisdom on Public Sector Roles in Agriculture and Rural Development: Case of Ukraine /FAO Research Report, Rome, 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christev, A., Kupets, O., & Lehmann, H. (2005). Trade Liberalization and Employment Effects in Ukraine. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1826, Institute for the Study of Labor (Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit, Bonn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramon-Taubadel von, S., Hess, S., & Brümmer, B. (2010). A Preliminary Analysis of the Impact of a Ukraine-EU Free Trade Agreement on Agriculture. Policy Research Working Paper 5264. The World Bank Development Research Group, Agriculture and Rural Development Team & Europe and Central Asia Region, April 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dantzig, G. B. (1963). Linear Programming and Extensions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermoliev, Y., & Leonardi, G. (1981). Some proposals for stochastic facility location models. Mathematical Modeling, 3, 407–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermoliev, Y., & Wets, R. (Eds.). (1988). Numerical techniques of stochastic optimization. Computational Mathematics. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermolieva, T., Ermoliev, Y., Fischer, G., Jonas, M., Makowski, M., & Wagner, F. (2010). Carbon emission trading and carbon taxes under uncertainties. Climatic Change, 103(1-2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ermolieva T., Fischer, G., & van Velthuizen, H. (2005). Livestock Production and Environmental Risks in China: Scenarios to 2030”, FAO/IIASA Research Report. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Ermolieva, T., Ermoliev, Y., & Sun, L. (2008). Risk-adjusted approaches for planning sustainable agricultural development. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, G., Ermolieva, T., Ermoliev, Y., & van Velthuizen, H. (2007). Sequential downscaling methods for Estimation from Aggregate Data. In K. Marti, Y. Ermoliev, M. Makowski, & G. Pflug (Eds.), Coping with Uncertainty: Modeling and Policy Issue. Berlin, StateNew York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The Spatial Economy: Cities, Regions, and Internatinal Trade. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giucci, R., & Bilan, O. (2005). High inflation in Ukraine: Roots and remedies. Interim Report U1, Institute for Economic Research and Policy Consulting, German Advisory Group on Economic Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyets, V. M. (2008). Agricultural and food markets under the WTO accession.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich, L. V. (1939). Mathematicheskie Metody Organizatsii i Planirovania Proizvodstva, Leningrad State University Publishers, translated as “Mathematical Methods in the Organization and Planning of Production” (1960) in Management Science 6, 4, pp, 366–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich, L. V., & Gavurin, M. K. (1940). (first version 1940, publ. 1949), “Primenenie matematicheskikh metodov v voprosakh analiza gruzopotokov,” in Problemy povysheniia effektivnosti raboty transporta (The Use of Mathematical Methods in Analyzing Problems of Goods Transport, in Problems of Increasing the Efficiency in the Transport Industry, pp. 110–138). Academy of Sciences, U.S.S.R.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantorovich, L. V. (1959), Ekonomicheskii raschst nailichshego ispolzovania resursov, Acad. of SC., USSR (translated (1965), The Best Use of Economic Resources. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koenker, R., & Bassett, G. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. (1947). Optimum utilization of the transportation system. In Proc. Intern. Statis. Conf., Voll. V. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, T. (1975). Concepts of optimality and their uses. Nobel Memorial Lecture, December 11. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leader European Observatory: Assessing the added value of the LEADER approach. Rural Innovation Dossiern 4 (Links Between Actions for the Development of the Rural Community).

    Google Scholar 

  • Libanova, E. (2006). Demographic crisys in Ukraine: Research problems, conclusions, and actions. In Steschenko (Ed.), Complex Demographic Forecasts to 2050 in Ukraine. Interim Report. NAS of Ukraine: Institute of Economics and Forecasting (In Ukrainian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantyley, V. (2009). Demographic situation of rural population in country-regionplaceUkraine in the period of intensive socio-economic transformation. Europ. Countries, 1, 34–52. DOI: 10.2478/v10091/009-0004-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prokopa, I., & Popova, O. (2008). Depopulation in Rural Areas of Ukraine: Destructive Changes and Threats (in Ukrainian). Interim Report. NAS of Ukraine: Institute of Economics and Forecasting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar, T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-Risk. The Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scrieciu, S. (2006). How useful are computable general equilibrium models for sustainability impact assessment? In C. Kirkpatrick, & C. George (Eds.), Impact Assessment and Sustainable Development: European Practice and Experience. Edward Elgar: Cheltenham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shnyrkov, A., Rogach, A., & Kopystyra, A. (2006). Ukraine’s joining the WTO: realities and challenges. Transition Studies Review, 13(3), 513–523 (DOI 10.1007/s11300-006-0121-0). New York: Springer.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarassevych, O. (2006). Ukraine: Poultry and Products Country Report. USDA Foreign Agricultural Service, GAIN Report, UP6015, (http://www.fas.usda.gov/psd).

  • Tarassevych, O. (2004). Ukraine: Livestock and Products. Annual GAIN Report, UP4014, (http://www.fas.usda.gov/psd).

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the participants of the IIASA/GAMM workshop on Coping with Uncertainty, and to the anonymous referees of this chapter, for their critical suggestions that led to improvements of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oleksandra Borodina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borodina, O. et al. (2012). Sustainable Agriculture, Food Security, and Socio-Economic Risks in Ukraine. In: Ermoliev, Y., Makowski, M., Marti, K. (eds) Managing Safety of Heterogeneous Systems. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 658. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22884-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics