Skip to main content

Using Protocols and Domain Specific Languages to Achieve Compliance of Administrative Processes with Legislation

  • Conference paper
Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective (EGOVIS 2011)

Abstract

The paper deals with the problem of achieving formal compliance of administrative process with corresponding legislation. The presented approach is based on an explicit introduction of protocol models specifying general rules and behavior extracted from legislation that regulates a set of administrative processes. Identified protocols are then transformed into a domain specific business modeling language used for specification of choreography and orchestration models of the regulated administrative processes. Compliance of these models with legislation is based on a formal approach which treats protocol model as the definition of a state machine and choreography models as a system which generates events to the state machine. Compliance is achieved if the sequence of events generated by all possible valid execution paths in the choreography is accepted by the defined state machine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allweyer, T.: BPMN 2.0 Introduction to the Standard for Business Process Modeling. Herstellung und Verlag: Books on Demand GmbH, Norderstedt (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Busi, N., Gorrieri, R., Guidi, C., Lucchi, R., Zavattaro, G.: Choreography and orchestration: A synergic approach for system design. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 228–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, J., Zhu, H., Pu, G.: Conformance Validation between Choreography and Orchestration. In: First Joint IEEE/IFIP Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering, TASE 2007, Shanghai, China, pp. 473–482. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Administrative Procedure Act, Finland, http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/kaannokset/2003/en20030434.pdf (accessed February 2011)

  5. Kopp, O., Wetzstein, B., Mietzner, R., Pottinger, S., Karastoyanova, D., Leymann, F.: A Model-Driven Approach to Implementing Coordination Protocols in BPEL. In: Ardagna, D., Mecella, M., Yang, J. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNBIP, vol. 17, pp. 188–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Object Constraint Language (OCL), http://www.omg.org/spec/OCL/ (accessed February 2011)

  7. Karagiannis, D.: A Business Process-Based Modelling Extension for Regulatory Compliance. In: Proceedings of Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik, MKWI 2008, München. GITO-Verlag, Berlin (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Turki, S., Bjekovic-Obradovic, M.: Compliance in e-Government Service Engineering: State-of-the-Art. In: Morin, J.-H., Ralyté, J., Snene, M. (eds.) IESS 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol. 53, pp. 270–275. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kharbili, M.E., Stein, S.: Policy-Based Semantic Compliance Checking for Business Process Management. In: MobIS Workshops 2008, pp. 178–192 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Darimont, R., Lemoine, M.: Goal-oriented Analysis of Regulations, In REMO 2V06: Int. Workshop on Regulations Modelling and their Verification & Validation, Luxemburg (June 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Awad, A., Decker, G., Weske, M.: Efficient compliance checking using bpmn-q and temporal logic. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 326–341. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghanavati, S., Amyot, D., Peyton, L.: Towards a Framework for Tracking Legal Compliance in Healthcare. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007 and WES 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 218–232. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. van Engers, T.M., Gerrits, R., Boekenoogen, M., Glassée, E., Kordelaar, P.: POWER: Using UML/OCL for Modeling Legislation - an application report. application report. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law. ACM, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Strahonja, V.: Modeling Legislation by using UML State Machine Diagrams. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering - IEEE CCECE 2006, pp. 1631–1634 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nešković, S., Paunović, O., Babarogić, S. (2011). Using Protocols and Domain Specific Languages to Achieve Compliance of Administrative Processes with Legislation. In: Andersen, K.N., Francesconi, E., Grönlund, Å., van Engers, T.M. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22961-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22961-9_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-22960-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-22961-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics