Skip to main content

Abstract

Communication between the translational evidence organization, clinicians, and patients is through the electronic chart. Through the chart, clinical inquiries are made, patient data from provider assessments and practice cost schedules are collected and encrypted (HIPAA standards), then inputted into the central database. Outputs are made within a time frame suitable to private practice and patient flow. The output consists of a clinical practice guideline that responds to the clinical inquiry with decision, utility, and cost data (based on the “average patient”) for shared decision-making within informed consent. This shared decision-making allows for patients to “game” treatment scenarios using personal choice inputs. Accompanying the clinical practice guideline is a decision analysis that explains the optimized clinical decision. The resultant clinical decision is returned to the central database using the clinical practice guideline. The result is subsequently used to update current best evidence, indicate the need for new evidence, and analyze the changes made in best evidence implementation. When updates in knowledge occur, these are transmitted to the provider as alerts or flags through patient charts and other communication modalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The Congress of the United States O Congressional Budget Office (2009) Research on the comparative effectiveness of medical treatments: Issues and options for an expanded federal role. Dec 2007. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/88xx/doc8891/12-18-ComparativeEffectiveness.pdf. Accessed 18 Aug 2009

  2. Health and Human Services (2009) Comparative effectiveness research funding: draft definition of comparative effectiveness research for the Federal Coordinating Council. Draft definition, prioritization criteria, and strategic framework for public comment. http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/draftdefinition.html. Accessed 18 Aug 2009

  3. Bauer J (2006). Process of evidence-based dental decision-making. US Patent Application No. 60/757,647, 9 Jan 2006, For: methods of producing evidence-based decision, Filed

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bakken S, McArthur J (2001) Evidence-based nursing practice: a call to action for nursing informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc 8:289–290

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Integrated Healthcare Association (2009) Pay for Performance (P4P) 2008 Results Report. http://www.iha.org/p4pyr6/02%20-%20P4P%202008%20ResultsReport.pdf. Accessed 29 Aug 2009

  6. Vargas CM, Kramarow EA, Yellowitz JA (2001). The oral health of older Americans. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Centers for Health Sciences. Aging Trends (3):1–8. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/ahcd/agingtrends/03oral.pdf. Accessed 27 Nov 2009

  7. Bauer JG, Spackman S (2007) Clinical decision making tree for older dental patients. In: Chiappelli F (ed) A manual of evidence-based research for health sciences: relevance to dentistry. Nova Publishers, New York, Chapter 13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Chiappelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bauer, J.G., Chiappelli, F. (2012). The Translation Evidence Mechanism. In: Chiappelli, F. (eds) Comparative Effectiveness and Efficacy Research and Analysis for Practice (CEERAP). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23144-5_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23144-5_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23143-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23144-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics