Abstract
In a recent study by Haun et al. (2011), Dutch-speaking children who prefer an egocentric (left/right) reference frame when describing spatial relationships, and Hai||om-speaking children who use a geocentric (north/south) frame were found to vary in their capacity to memorize small-scale arrays using their language-incongruent system. In two experiments, we reconcile these results with previous findings by Li et al. (2011) which showed that English (egocentric) and Tseltal Mayan (geocentric) speakers can flexibly use both systems. In Experiment 1, attempting to replicate Haun et al., we found that English- but not Tseltal-speaking children could use their language-incongruent system. In Experiment 2, we demonstrate that Tseltal children can use an egocentric system when instructed nonverbally without left/right language. We argue that Haun et al.’s results are due to the Hai||om children’s lack of understanding of left/right instructions and that task constraints determine which system is easier to use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abarbanell, L.: Words and Worlds: Spatial Language and Thought among the Tseltal Maya. Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge (2010) (unpublished Doctoral Dissertation)
Abarbanell, L.: Linguistic Flexibility in Frame of Reference Use among Adult Tseltal (Mayan) Speakers. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Anaheim, CA (2007)
Bowerman, M., Levinson, S.C.: Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)
Brown, P.: A Sketch of the Grammar of Space in Tzeltal. In: Levinson, S.C., Wilkins, D. (eds.) Grammars of Space, pp. 230–272. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: ‘Left’ and ‘Right’ in Tenejapa: Investigating a Linguistic and Conceptual Gap. Z. Phon. Sprachwiss. Kommunforsch (ZPSK) 45(6), 590–611 (1992)
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: ‘Uphill’ and ‘Downhill’ in Tzeltal. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 3(1), 46–74 (1993a)
Brown, P., Levinson, S.C.: Linguistic and Nonlinguistic Coding of Spatial Arrays: Explorations in Mayan Cognition. Cognitive Anthropology Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics (1993b)
Cepeda, N.J., Kramer, A.F., Gonzales de Sather, J.M.C.: Changes in Executive Control Across the Life-span: Examination of Task Switching Performance. Developmental Psychology 37, 715–730 (2001)
de León, L.: Exploration in the Acquisition of Geocentric Location by Tzotzil Children. Linguistics 32, 857–884 (1994)
Gentner, D., Goldin-Meadow, S. (eds.): Language in Mind: Advances in the Study of Language and Thought. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)
Gleitman, L., Papafragou, A.: Language and Thought. In: Holyoak, K.J., Morrison, B. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)
Gumperz, J.J., Levinson, S.C. (eds.): Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)
Haun, D.B.M., Rapold, C.J., Janzen, G., Levinson, S.C.: Plasticity of Human Spatial Cognition: Spatial Language and Cognition Covary across Cultures. Cognition 119(1), 70–80 (2011)
Levinson, S.C.: Frames of Reference and Molyneux’s Question: Cross-Linguistic Evidence. In: Bloom, P., Peterson, M.A., Nadel, L., Garrett, M.F. (eds.) Language and Space, pp. 109–169. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)
Levinson, S.C.: Space in Language and Cognition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)
Li, P., Gleitman, L.: Turning the Tables: Language and Spatial Reasoning. Cognition 83(3), 265–294 (2002)
Li, P., Abarbanell, L., Gleitman, L., Papafragou, A.: Spatial Reasoning in Tenejapan Mayans. Cognition 120(1), 33–53 (2011)
Luchins, A.S.: Mechanization in Problem Solving: The Effect of ‘Einstellung. In: Psychological Monographs, vol. 54(6), whole no. 248. American Psychological Association, Inc., Evanston (1942)
Majid, A., Bowerman, M., Kita, S., Haun, D.B.M., Levinson, S.C.: Can Language Restructure Cognition? The Case for Space. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(3), 108–114 (2004)
Mishra, R.C., Dasen, P.R., Niraula, S.: Ecology, Language, and Performance on Spatial Cognitive Tasks. International Journal of Psychology 38, 366–383 (2003)
Newcombe, N.S., Huttenlocher, J.: Making Space: The Development of Spatial Representation and Reasoning. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)
Pederson, E., Danziger, E., Wilkins, D., Levinson, S.C., Kita, S., Senft, G.: Semantic Typology and Spatial Conceptualization. Language 74(3), 557–589 (1998)
Piaget, J.: Judgment and Reasoning in the Child. Routledge, London (1928)
Pinker, S.: The Stuff of Thought. Penguin Group, Inc., New York (2007)
Polian, G.: New Insights on Spatial Frames of Reference in Tseltal. Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Indigenous Languages of the Americas. Baltimore, MA (2010)
Rigal, R.: Right-Left Orientation: Development of Correct Use of Right and Left. Perceptual and Motor Skills 79, 1259–1278 (1994)
Rigal, R.: Right-Left Orientation, Mental Rotation, and Perspective-taking: When can Children Imagine What People See from Their Own Viewpoint? Perceptual and Motor Skills 83(3), 831–843 (1996)
Senft, G.: Frames of Spatial Reference in Kilivila. Studies in Language 25(3), 521–555 (2001)
Li, P., Shusterman, McNaughton, A.: The Right Way to Learn ‘Right’ and ‘Left’
Simons, D.J., Wang, R.F.: Perceiving Real World Viewpoint Changes. Psychological Science 9, 315–320 (1998)
Terrill, A., Burenhult, N.: Orientation as a Strategy for Spatial Reference. Studies in Language 32(1), 93–136 (2008)
Wassmann, J., Dasen, P.: Balinese Spatial Orientation: Some Empirical Evidence for Moderate Linguistic Relativity. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(1), 689–711 (1998)
Whorf, B.L.: Language, Thought and Reality: Selected Writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf. In: Carroll, J.B. (ed.) MIT Press, Cambridge (1956)
Widlok, T.: Topographical Gossip and the Indexicality of Hai||om Environmental Knowledge (Working Paper No. 37). Cognitive Anthropology Research Group. Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen (1996)
Widlok, T.: Conducting Cognitive Tasks and Interpreting the Results: The Case of Spatial Inference Tasks. In: Wassmann, J., Stockhaus, K. (eds.) Experiencing New Worlds, pp. 258–280. Berghahn Books, Oxford (2007)
Yerys, B.E., Munakata, Y.: When Labels Hurt but Novelty Helps: Children’s Perseveration and Flexibility in a Card-sorting Task. Child Development 77(6), 1589–1607 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Abarbanell, L., Montana, R., Li, P. (2011). Revisiting the Plasticity of Human Spatial Cognition. In: Egenhofer, M., Giudice, N., Moratz, R., Worboys, M. (eds) Spatial Information Theory. COSIT 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6899. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23196-4_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23195-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23196-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)