Skip to main content

Multiple Contrast Tests for Testing Dose–Response Relationships Under Order-Restricted Alternatives

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modeling Dose-Response Microarray Data in Early Drug Development Experiments Using R

Part of the book series: Use R! ((USE R))

Abstract

In Chap. 3, 7, and 8, we discussed five test statistics that can be used for testing the null hypothesis of homogeneity of means against order-restricted alternatives. A rejection of the null hypothesis implies a significant monotone trend of gene expression with respect to dose. In this chapter, we employ an alternative method to find genes with monotonic trends, namely, the multiple contrast test (MCT). We dicuss the method for both monotone and non monotone alternatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayer, M., Brunk, H. D., Ewing, G. M., Reid, W. T., & Silverman, E. (1955). An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlow, R. E., Bartholomew, D. J., Bremner, M. J., & Brunk, H. D. (1972). Statistical inference under order restriction. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, F. (1999). Powerful modifications of Williams’ test on trend. Ph.D. dissertation. Vom Fachbereich Gartenbau der Universit{a}t Hannover, Hannover, http://www.biostat.uni-hannover.de/fileadmin/institut/pdf/thesis_bretz.pdf.

  • Bretz, F., & Hothorn, L. A. (2001). Testing dose-response relationship with a priori unknown, possibly non monotone shapes. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 11, 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, F., & Hothorn, L. A. (2003). Statistical analysis of monotone and non-monotone dose-response data from in vitro toxicological assays. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals (ALTA) (Suppl. 1), 31, 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, F. (2006). An extension of the Williams trend test to general unbalanced linear models. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 50, 1735–1748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretz, F., Hothorn, T., & Westfall P. (2010). Multiple comparisons using R. Boca Raton: CRC press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, C. W. (1955). A multiple comparison procedure for comparing several treatments with a control. Journal of the American Statistical Society (JASA), 50, 1096–1121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunnett, C. W. (1964). New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics, 20, 482–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genz, A., & Bretz, F. (2009) Computation of multivariate normal and t probabilities. Lecture Notes in Statistics, 195 (Springer).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hothorn, L. A. (2006). Multiple comparisons and multiple contrasts in randomized dose-response trials—Confidence interval orient approaches. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 16, 711–731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R. (1976). The powers of some tests of the quality of normal means against an ordered alternative. Biometrika, 63, 177–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee, H., Roberston, T., & Wright, F. T. (1986). Multiple contrast tests for testing against a simple tree ordering. In R. Dykstra (Ed.), Advances in order restricted statistical inference (pp. 203–230). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukerjee, H., Roberston, T., & Wright, F. T. (1987). Comparison of several treatments with a control using multiple contrasts. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 82, 902–910.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, T., Wright, F. T., & Dykstra, R. L. (1988). Order restricted statistical inference. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. (1997). Multiple testing and simultaneous confidence intervals: calculation of constants. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 25, 217–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somerville, P. (1999). Critical values for multiple testing and comparisons: One step and step down procedures. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 82(1), 129–138(10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tukey, J. W. (1953). The problem of multiple comparisons. Unpublished manuscript. In The collected works of John W. Tukey VIII. Multiple comparisons, 1948–1983 (pp. 1–300). New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. A. (1971). A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. Biometrics, 27, 103–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D. A. (1972). The comparision of several dose levels with a zero dose control. Biometrics, 28, 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dan Lin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, D., Hothorn, L.A., Djira, G.D., Bretz, F. (2012). Multiple Contrast Tests for Testing Dose–Response Relationships Under Order-Restricted Alternatives. In: Lin, D., Shkedy, Z., Yekutieli, D., Amaratunga, D., Bijnens, L. (eds) Modeling Dose-Response Microarray Data in Early Drug Development Experiments Using R. Use R!. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24007-2_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics