Skip to main content

A Tale of Two ERP Vendors – and the Crucial Decision of Choosing the Right Business Model

  • Conference paper
ENTERprise Information Systems (CENTERIS 2011)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 219))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1450 Accesses

Abstract

The paper looks at the history of two ERP vendors (Maconomy and Navision) in Denmark pursuing two different business models. On one hand, Maconomy decided to develop, sell and implement ERP packages directly to customer. They believed they would be best at it, and they would obtain valuable information about customer requirements in the process. On the other hand, Navision adopted a business model which relied on an ecosystem of partners consisting of value added resellers (VAR) and independent software vendors (ISV) to sell, implement and further develop add-ons for their software. The paper presents a Resource Based View (RBV) analysis comparing and contrasting the resources of the two companies, in order to explain why Navision was sold for 16 times as much as Maconomy. We posit that the main reason for this huge difference is the value of Navision’s ecosystem enabling them to achieve economies of scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Zwilling, M.: How To Value A Young Company:You could stick a wet finger in the air. Or you could use these smarter techniques. Forbes (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mata, F.J., Fuerst, W.L., Barney, J.B.: Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based Analysis. MIS Quarterly 19, 487–505 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wade, M., Hulland, J.: Review: The Resource Based View and Information Systems Research: Review, Extension and Suggestions for Future Research. MIS Quarterly 28, 109–142 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barney, J.B.: Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management 17, 99–120 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ray, G., Barney, J.B., Muhanna, W.A.: Capabilities, Business Processes, and Competitive Advantage: Choosing the Dependent Variable in Empirical Tests of the Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal 25, 23–37 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Das, T.K., Teng, B.-S.: A Resource-Based Theory of Strategic Alliances. Journal of Management 26, 31–61 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eisenhardt, K.M., Schoonhoven, C.B.: Resource-based View of Strategic Alliance Formation: Strategic and Social Effects in Entrepreneurial Firms. Organization Science 7, 136 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mahoney, J., Pandian, J.: The Resouce-Based View within the Conversation of Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal 7, 363–380 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kvale, S., Brinkmann, S.: Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenhardt, K.M.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management 14, 532–550 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. European Journal of Information Systems 15, 320–330 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, P.: Deltek Completes Tender Offer for Acquisition of Maconomy, Herndon, VA (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. World, D.: Dynamics NAV Timeline (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kane, M.: Microsoft seals deal for Danish company. CNET (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wright, R.: Microsoft Lays Out Navision Plan. CRN (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maconomy: Annual Reports (2000-2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Echols, T.: Deltek offers $73 million for Maconomy. Washington Business Journal, Washington (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Collins, J.C.: A Review of Axapta. Accounting Software News. Accounting Software Advisor, LLC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Antero, M., Bjørn-Andersen, N. (2011). A Tale of Two ERP Vendors – and the Crucial Decision of Choosing the Right Business Model. In: Cruz-Cunha, M.M., Varajão, J., Powell, P., Martinho, R. (eds) ENTERprise Information Systems. CENTERIS 2011. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24358-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24358-5_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24357-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24358-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics