Skip to main content

Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Planning

(But Were Afraid to Ask)

  • Conference paper
KI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7006))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Domain-independent planning is one of the long-standing sub-areas of Artificial Intelligence (AI), aiming at approaching human problem-solving flexibility. The area has long had an affinity towards playful illustrative examples, imprinting it on the mind of many a student as an area concerned with the rearrangement of blocks, and with the order in which to put on socks and shoes (not to mention the disposal of bombs in toilets). Working on the assumption that this “student” is you – the readers in earlier stages of their careers – I herein aim to answer three questions that you surely desired to ask back then already: What is it good for? Does it work? Is it interesting to do research in? Answering the latter two questions in the affirmative (of course!), I outline some of the major developments of the last decade, revolutionizing the ability of planning to scale up, and the understanding of the enabling technology. Answering the first question, I point out that modern planning proves to be quite useful for solving practical problems - including, perhaps, yours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blum, A.L., Furst, M.L.: Fast planning through planning graph analysis. Artificial Intelligence 90(1-2), 279–298 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Planning as heuristic search. Artificial Intelligence 129(1–2), 5–33 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonet, B., Geffner, H.: Heuristics for planning with penalties and rewards formulated in logic and computed through circuits. Artificial Intelligence 172(12-13), 1579–1604 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonet, B., Helmert, M.: Strengthening landmark heuristics via hitting sets. In: Proceedings of the 19th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bonet, B., Loerincs, G., Geffner, H.: A robust and fast action selection mechanism for planning. In: Proceedings of the 14th National Conference of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bylander, T.: The computational complexity of propositional STRIPS planning. Artificial Intelligence 69(1–2), 165–204 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Castillo, L.A., Morales, L., González-Ferrer, A., Fernández-Olivares, J., Borrajo, D., Onaindia, E.: Automatic generation of temporal planning domains for e-learning problems. Journal of Scheduling 13(4), 347–362 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Cresswell, S., McCluskey, T.L., West, M.M.: Acquisition of object-centred domain models from planning examples. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edelkamp, S.: Planning with pattern databases. In: Recent Advances in AI Planning. 6th European Conference on Planning (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fox, M., Long, D.: PDDL2.1: An extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20, 61–124 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerevini, A., Saetti, A., Serina, I.: Planning through stochastic local search and temporal action graphs. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20, 239–290 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghallab, M., Nau, D., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2004)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Haslum, P., Geffner, H.: Admissible heuristics for optimal planning. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Helmert, M., Domshlak, C.: Landmarks, critical paths and abstractions: What’s the difference anyway? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Helmert, M., Haslum, P., Hoffmann, J.: Flexible abstraction heuristics for optimal sequential planning. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hoffmann, J.: Where ignoring delete lists works, part II: Causal graphs. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hoffmann, J.: Local search topology in planning benchmarks: An empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmann, J.: Local search topology in planning benchmarks: A theoretical analysis. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning and Scheduling (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hoffmann, J.: The Metric-FF planning system: Translating “ignoring delete lists” to numeric state variables. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 20, 291–341 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Hoffmann, J.: Utilizing Problem Structure in Planning: A Local Search Approach. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2854. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hoffmann, J.: Where ‘ignoring delete lists’ works: Local search topology in planning benchmarks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 24, 685–758 (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann, J.: Analyzing search topology without running any search: On the connection between causal graphs and h  + . Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 41, 155–229 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffmann, J., Nebel, B.: The FF planning system: Fast plan generation through heuristic search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 253–302 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Hoffmann, J., Weber, I., Kraft, F.M.: SAP speaks PDDL. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Karpas, E., Domshlak, C.: Cost-optimal planning with landmarks. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Katz, M., Domshlak, C.: Optimal additive composition of abstraction-based admissible heuristics. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Koller, A., Hoffmann, J.: Waking up a sleeping rabbit: On natural-language sentence generation with FF. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Koller, A., Petrick, R.: Experiences with planning for natural language generation. Computational Intelligence 27(1), 23–40 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Lucangeli, J., Sarraute, C., Richarte, G.: Attack planning in the real world. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Intelligent Security (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. McDermott, D.: A heuristic estimator for means-ends analysis in planning. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  31. McDermott, D., et al.: The PDDL Planning Domain Definition Language. In: The AIPS 1998 Planning Competition Committee (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richter, S., Helmert, M.: Preferred operators and deferred evaluation in satisficing planning. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Richter, S., Westphal, M.: The LAMA planner: Guiding cost-based anytime planning with landmarks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 39, 127–177 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Rintanen, J.: Heuristics for planning with SAT. In: Cohen, D. (ed.) CP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6308, pp. 414–428. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  35. Rintanen, J., Heljanko, K., Niemelä, I.: Planning as satisfiability: parallel plans and algorithms for plan search. Artificial Intelligence 170(12-13), 1031–1080 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Ruml, W., Do, M.B., Zhou, R., Fromherz, M.P.J.: On-line planning and scheduling: An application to controlling modular printers. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 40, 415–468 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Simpson, R.M., Kitchin, D.E., McCluskey, T.L.: Planning domain definition using GIPO. Knowledge Engineering Review 22(2), 117–134 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Thayer, J., Ruml, W.: Bounded suboptimal search: A direct approach using inadmissible estimates. In: Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Vaquero, T.S., Romero, V., Tonidandel, F., Silva, J.R.: itSIMPLE 2.0: an integrated tool for designing planning domains. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hoffmann, J. (2011). Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Planning . In: Bach, J., Edelkamp, S. (eds) KI 2011: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7006. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24455-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24455-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-24454-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-24455-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics