Skip to main content

Antifungal Properties of Plant Extract and Density on Some Fungal Diseases and Yield of Cowpea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chemistry for Sustainable Development in Africa

Abstract

Cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) is one of the most important food legume crops grown in many tropical and subtropical countries. An experiment was carried out during the planting seasons of 2006 and 2007 respectively, to determine the antifungal properties of plant extract and plant density on some fungal diseases and yield of Ife brown 825–124 (erect type) cowpea. Analysis of variance indicated that plant density was highly significant on leafspot disease at 6 weeks after planting (0.71, 0.82) and at 8 weeks after planting (0.74, 0.82) at 5 % probability level in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Plant extract was significant on leafspot disease severity at 4 weeks after planting (0.43, 0.51) as well as 6 weeks after planting (0.051, 0.22) in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Gongronema latifolium treated plots recorded the lowest of all the diseases and seasons investigated. No sprayed plots (control), recorded the highest leafspot disease severity (10.3, 13.3) while, G. latifolium had very high antifungal (7.7, 6.10). Vernonia amygdalina recorded the lowest severity of blight (4.3, 5.5). 50 × 100 cm recorded the highest leafspot disease severity (10.3, 15.0) as well as blight (5.7, 5.1), while 100 × 100 cm had the lowest (7.0, 6.2) in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Similarly, 50 × 100 cm recorded the highest severity of blight (5.7, 5.1) with 100 × 100 cm recording lowest (4.0, 4.6). Investigation revealed that the severity of leafspot and blight diseases had a direct relation with plants’ age. Interaction of G. latifolium and 100 × 100 cm, as well as interaction of no spray with 50 × 100 cm, recorded the lowest leafspot disease severity. Interaction of no spray with 50 × 100 cm recorded the lowest severity of leafspot disease (3.0, 4.2). Gongronema latifolium interaction with 100 × 100 cm, recorded the lowest occurrence of blight (3.0, 0.5). Similarly, interaction of V. amygdalina with 75 × 100 cm recorded the lowest severity of blight (0.3, 0.1), while that of no spray with 50 × 100 cm recorded the highest severity of blight (1.0, 1.5) in 2006 and 2007, respectively. Vernonia amygdalina interaction with spacing 50 × 100 cm recorded the highest stalk yield (119.7, 132.0). Investigation showed that closer spacing and no treatment increased the severity of the diseases on yield and performance of cowpea. The microorganisms identified with infected cowpea were Aspergillus species, Penicillium species, and Rhizoctonia solani.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Alabi O (1994) Epidemiology of cowpea blown blotch induced by Colletotricum capsicis and assessment crop losses due to disease. J Sustain Agric Environ 4:5–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Alabi DA (1999) Effect of acetyl salicylic acid on distribution and total photosynthates in three cultivars of tomato. Niger J Sci 2(1):101–103

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen DJ, Ampofo JKO, Wortman CS (1996) Pests, diseases and nutritional disorders of the common bean in Africa. Field Guide 4:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anon O (1990) Annual report of the Agricultural Products Monitoring and Evaluation Unit (APRAEU) of the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Lagos, Nigeria, 125 pp

    Google Scholar 

  5. Awurum AM, Emechebe AM, Amadioha AC (2001) Effect of cropping system on disease development in cowpea in Umudike, South Western Nigeria. J Sustain Agric Environ 2:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bankole SA, Adebanjo A (2003) Aflatoxin contamination of dried yam chips marketed in Nigeria. Trop Sci 43:201–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Barnett HL, Hunter BB (1998) Descriptions and illustrations of genera. Illustrated genera of imperfect fungi. The American Phytopathological Society press, St. Paul, pp 59–218

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blumenthal MJ, Ison RL (1994) Plant population dynamics. Insuerranean Colver and Murex Medic Swards, 60 pp

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emechebe AM, Shoyinko SA (1985) Fungal and bacterial diseases of cowpea in Africa. In Cowpea research, production and utilization, 173 pp

    Google Scholar 

  10. FAO (1990) Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Bot Maize Level Crop Corn 10:2–5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fetuga BL, Ologhbo AD (1987) Energy values in differently processed cowpeas. Nig Food J 5:18–23

    Google Scholar 

  12. Florini DA (1997) Nematodes and other soil-borne pathogens of cowpea. In: Singh BB, Mohana Raj, Dashiell KE, Jackai LEN (eds) Advances in cowpea research. Center for Agricultural Science (JIRCAS). IITA, Ibadan, pp 193–206

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ford JE, Hewitt D (1980) In: Bond DA (ed) Vicia Faba feeding values, processing and viruses. L Martinus Nihoff, The Hague, pp 125–139

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hume l (1985) Crop losses in wheat (Triticum aestivum). As determined using weeded and non-weeded quadrats. Weed Sci 33:734–740

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ihejirika GO, Nwufo MI (2001) Effects of plant population and nitrogen application on severity of leafspot disease, growth and yield of Benniseed. (Sesamum indicum). Afr J Sci Technol 2(1, 2):203–207

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jagtap SS, Alabi RT, Adelege O (1998) The influence of maize density or resources use and productivity. Afr Crop Sci J 6:259–272

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuruchve V, Ezhilan JG, Jayam J (1997) Screening of higher plants for fungi toxicity against Rhizoctonia solani in vitro. Indian Phytopathol 50(2):235–241

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ltunde-Dada AO (1990) Assessmant of Antracnose disease in some cultivars of cowpea. J Phytopathol 130(2):147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mahadeum A (1982) Biochemical aspects of plant disease resistance. Annu Plant Rev 10:125–129

    Google Scholar 

  20. O’Donovan JT (1994) Canola (Brassica rapa) plant density influence tartary buck wheat (Fagoprum tatarium) interference, biomass, and seed yield. Weed Sci 42:385–389

    Google Scholar 

  21. Oputa EE (2004) Effect of NPK fertilizer and plant population on severity of leafspot disease and yield of groundnut. Department of Crop Science & Technology, Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Nigeria, 45 pp

    Google Scholar 

  22. Richardson MJ (1990) An annotated list of seed—borne diseases, 4th edn. Th International Seed Testing Association, Zurich

    Google Scholar 

  23. SAS (1999) Statistical analysis system: user’s guide. Statistics SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stoffella PJ, Bullock RC, Sonoda KM (1990) Influence of pesticide spray schedules on the yield of cowpea. Trop Hortic 34:83–87

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Onyengecha Ihejirika .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ihejirika, G.O. (2013). Antifungal Properties of Plant Extract and Density on Some Fungal Diseases and Yield of Cowpea. In: Gurib-Fakim, A., Eloff, J. (eds) Chemistry for Sustainable Development in Africa. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29642-0_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics