Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operative und minimal-invasive Verfahren bei Rücken- und Nackenschmerz

  • Chapter
Rückenschmerzen und Nackenschmerzen

  • 9219 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Erkrankungen im Bereich der Wirbelsäule sind häufige und geläufige pathologische Befunde mit teils erheblichem Einfluss auf die Lebensqualität des betroffenen Patienten. Muskuläre Dysbalancen ausnehmend, lässt sich meist ein kausaler Zusammenhang zwischen Schmerzen und degenerativen Veränderungen, Frakturen, Infektionen oder Tumoren an der Wirbelsäule finden. Neben den konservativen Maßnahmen ist die Wirbelsäulenchirurgie eine bedeutende Säule in der Behandlung dieser Erkrankungen und repräsentiert ein stetig wachsendes Gebiet der heutigen Medizin. Bedingt durch die immer älter werdende Bevölkerung wird künftig die Nachfrage nach chirurgischen Behandlungsmöglichkeiten von degenerativen Wirbelsäulenerkrankungen, insbesondere von Lenden- und Halswirbelsäule, zunehmen. Daher sind Kenntnisse über die operativen Therapieoptionen unerlässlich, um den Beschwerden des Patienten interdisziplinär begegnen und gerecht werden zu können.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Literatur zu Abschn. 30.1

  1. Akamaru T, Kawahara N, Tim Yoon S et al (2003) Adjacent segment motion after a simulated lumbar fusion in different sagittal alignments: a biomechanical analysis. Spine 28(14):1560–1566

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Amundsen T, Weber H, Nordal HJ et al (2000) Lumbar spinal stenosis: conservative or surgical management? A prospective 10-year study. Spine 25(11):1424–1435

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bundesärztekammer (BÄK), Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV), Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) (2010). Nationale Versorgungsleitlinie Kreuzschmerz — Kurzfassung. Version 1.X.2010. http://www.leitlinien.de/nvl/kreuzschmerz/. Zugegriffen: 6. August 2015

  4. Carragee EJ, Don AS, Hurwitz EL et al (2009) 2009 ISSLS Prize Winner: Does discography cause accelerated progression of degeneration changes in the lumbar disc: a ten-year matched cohort study. Spine 34(21):2338–2345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Delank KS, Gercek E, Kuhn S et al (2010) How does spinal canal decompression and dorsal stabilization affect segmental mobility? A biomechanical study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:285–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Eysel P, Rompe JD, Hopf C (1994) Prognostic criteria of discogenic paresis. Eur Spine J 3:214–218

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Eysel P, Zöllner J, Heine J (2000) Die künstliche Bandscheibe. Dtsch Arztebl 97(46):A3092–3096

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fairbank J, Frost H, Wilson-MacDonald J et al (2005) Randomised controlled trial to compare surgical stabilisation of the lumbar spine with an intensive rehabilitation programme for patients with chronic low back pain: the MRC spine stabilisation trial. BMJ 330(7502):1233

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Wessberg P et al (2001) 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 26(23):2521–2532

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fritzell P, Hägg O, Nordwall A et al (2003) Complications in lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain: comparison of three surgical tewchniques used in a prospective randomized study. A report from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Eur Spine J 12(2):178–189

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghiselli G, Wang JC, Bhatia NN et al (2004) Adjacent segment degeneration in the lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A(7):1497–1503

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gibson JN, Waddell G (2007) Surgical interventions for lumbar disc prolapse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD001350

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grob D, Benini A, Junge A, Mannion AF (2005) Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine: surgical and patient-oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years. Spine 30(3):324–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kabir SM, Gupta SR, Casey AT (2010) Lumbar interspinous spacers. A systematic Review of clinical and biomechanical evidence. Spine 35(25):E1499–E1506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kast E, Oberle J, Richter HP, Börm W (2008) Success of simple sequestrectomy in lumbar spine surgery depends on the competence of the fibrous ring: a prospective controlled study of 168 patients. Spine 33(14):1567–1571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kayaoglu CR, Calikoglu C, Binler S (2003) Re-operation after lumbar disc surgery: results in 85 cases. J Int Med Res 31(4): 318–323

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lebow RL, Adogwa O, Parker SL et al (2011) Asymptomatic same-site recurrent disc herniation after lumbar discectomy: Results of a prospective longitudinal study with two-year serial imaging. Spine 36(25):2147–51. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182054595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McAfee PC, Khoo LT, Pimenta L et al (2007) Treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with a total posterior arthroplasty prosthesis: implant description, surgical technique, and a prospective report on 29 patients. Neurosurg Focus 22(1):E13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Niemesto L, Kalso E, Malmivaara A et al (2003) Radiofrequency denervation for neck and back pain. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1):CD004058

    Google Scholar 

  20. Putzier M, Funk JF, Schneider SV et al (2006) Charité total disc replacement — clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years. Eur Spine J 15(2):183–195

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reinhardt A, Hufnagel S (2010) Langzeitergebnisse des interspinösen Distraktionssystems X-STOP. Orthopäde 39: 573–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reith M, Richter M (2010) Ergebnisse des interspinösen Wallis-Implantats. Orthopäde 39:580–584

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruetten S, Komp M, Merk H, Godolias G (2008) Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional mircrosurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine 33(9):931–939

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schnake KJ, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B (2006) Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 31(4):442–449

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schulte TL, Hurschler C, Haversath M et al (2008) The effect of dynamic, semi-rigid implants on the range of motion of lumbar motion segments after decompression. Eur Spine J 17(8): 1057–1065

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Sénégas J, Vital JM, Pointillart V, Mangione P (2009) Clinical evaluation of a lumbar interspinous dynamic stabilization device (the Wallis system) with a 13-year mean follow-up. Neurosurg Rev 32(3):335–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Siepe CJ, Zelenkov P, Sauri-Barraza JC et al (2010) The fate of facet joint and adjacent level disc degeneration following total lumbar disc replacement: a prospective clinical, x-ray, and magnetic resonance imaging investigation. Spine 35(22):1991–2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sobottke R, Schlüter-Brust K, Kaulhausen T et al (2009) Interspinous implants (X Stop®, Wallis®, Diam®) for the treatment of LSS: is there a correlation between radiological parameters and clinical outcome? Eur Spine J 18:1494–1503

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Thornbury JR, Fryback DG, Turski PA et al (1993) Disk-caused nerve compression in patients with acute low back pain: Diagnosis with MR, CT myelography, and plain CT. Radiology 186:731–738

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trouiller H, Kern P, Refior HJ, Müller-Gerbl M (2006) A prospective morphological study of facet joint integrity following intervertebral disc replacement with the CHARITÉTM artificial disc. Eur Spine J 15:174–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Urrutia G, Kovacs F, Nishishinya MB, Olabe J (2007) Percutaneous thermocoagulation intradiscal techniques for discogenic low back pain. Spine 32(10):1146–1154

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Weinstein JN, Lurie JD, Olson PR et al (2006) United States’ trends and regional variations in lumbar spine surgery: 1992–2003. Spine 31(23):2707–2714

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD et al (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:794–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilke HJ, Heuer F, Schmidt H (2009) Prospective design delineation and subsequent in vitro evaluation of a new posterior dynamic stabilization system. Spine 34(3):255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Würgler-Hauri CC, Kalbarczyk A, Wiesli M et al (2008) Dynamic neutralization of the lumbar spine after microsurgical decompression in acquired lumbar spinal stenosis and segmental instability. Spine 33(3):E66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zarghooni K, Siewe J, Eysel P (2011) Standortbestimmung der lumbalen Bandscheibenendoprothetik. Orthopäde 40:141–147

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhu Q, Larson CR, Sjovold SG et al (2007) Biomechanical evaluation of the total facet arthroplasty systemTM: 3-dimensional kinematics. Spine 32(1):55–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zindrick MR, Tzermiadianos MN, Voronov LI et al (2008) An evidence-based medicine approach in determining factors that may affect outcome in lumbar total disc replacement. Spine 33(11):1262–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Hartjen CA et al (2004) A prospective randomized multi-center study fort he treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X-STOP interspinous implant: 1-year results. Eur Spine J 13(4):22–31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Literatur zu Abschn. 30.2

  1. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll LJ, Kristman V (2004) The annual incidence and course of neck pain in the general population: a population-based cohort study. Pain 112(3):267–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cote P, Cassidy JD, Carroll L (2000) The factors associated with neck pain and its related disability in the Saskatchewan population. Spine 25(9):1109–1117

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rao RD, Currier BL, Albert TJ, Bono CM, Marawar SV, Poelstra KA et al (2007) Degenerative cervical spondylosis: clinical syndromes, pathogenesis, and management. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(6):1360–1378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carette S, Fehlings MG (2005) Clinical practice. Cervical radiculopathy. N Engl J Med 353(4):392–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen YC, Lee SH, Saenz Y, Lehman NL (2003) Histologic findings of disc, end plate and neural elements after coblation of nucleus pulposus: an experimental nucleoplasty study. Spine J 3(6): 466–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cohen SP, Williams S, Kurihara C, Griffith S, Larkin TM (2005) Nucleoplasty with or without intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) as a treatment for lumbar herniated disc. J Spinal Disord Tech 18:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamamoto I, Ikeda A, Shibuya N, Tsugane R, Sato O (1991) Clinical long-term results of anterior discectomy without interbody fusion for cervical disc disease. Spine 16(3):272–279

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lieu AS, Howng SL (1998) Clinical results of anterior cervical discectomy without interbody fusion. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 14(4):212–216

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Emery SE, Bolesta MJ, Banks MA, Jones PK (1994) Robinson anterior cervical fusion comparison of the standard and modified techniques. Spine 19(6):660–663

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Y, Wang X, Lu X, Yang L, Yang H, Yuan W et al (2013) Comparison of titanium and polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in the surgical treatment of multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective, randomized, control study with over 7-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 22(7):1539–1546

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bohlman HH, Emery SE, Goodfellow DB, Jones PK (1993) Robinson anterior cervical discectomy and arthrodesis for cervical radiculopathy. Long-term follow-up of one hundred and twenty-two patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75(9):1298–1307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, Delamarter RB (2000) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine 25(1):41–45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Savolainen S, Rinne J, Hernesniemi J (1998) A prospective randomized study of anterior single-level cervical disc operations with long-term follow-up: surgical fusion is unnecessary. Neurosurgery 43(1):51–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Evaniew N, Khan M, Drew B, Kwok D, Bhandari M, Ghert M (2014) Minimally invasive versus open surgery for cervical and lumbar discectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ open 2(4):E295–305

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hacker RJ (2000) A randomized prospective study of an anterior cervical interbody fusion device with a minimum of 2 years of follow-up results. J Neurosurg 93(2):222–226

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick JS, Levy JA, Carillo J, Moeini SR (1999) Reconstruction after multilevel corpectomy in the cervical spine. A sagittal plane biomechanical study. Spine 24(12):1186–1190; discus. 91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Auerbach JD, Jones KJ, Fras CI, Balderston JR, Rushton SA, Chin KR (2008) The prevalence of indications and contraindications to cervical total disc replacement. Spine J 8(5):711–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Upadhyaya CD, Wu JC, Trost G, Haid RW, Traynelis VC, Tay B et al (2012) Analysis of the three United States Food and Drug Administration investigational device exemption cervical arthroplasty trials. J Neurosurg 16(3):216–228

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang H, Zhu Z, Qiu Y, Qian B, Qiu X, Ji M (2012) Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 132(2):141–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gao Y, Liu M, Li T, Huang F, Tang T, Xiang Z (2013) A meta-analysis comparing the results of cervical disc arthroplasty with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for the treatment of symptomatic cervical disc disease. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(6):555–561

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Miao J, Yu F, Shen Y, He N, Kuang Y, Wang X et al (2014) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of cervical disc replacement with a new prosthesis. Spine J 14(6):878–883

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scoville WB (1966) Types of cervical disk lesions and their surgical approaches. Jama 196(6):479–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boehm H, Greiner-Perth R, El-Saghir H, Allam Y (2003) A new minimally invasive posterior approach for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy: surgical technique and preliminary results. Eur Spine J 12(3):268–273

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Hirabayashi K, Watanabe K, Wakano K, Suzuki N, Satomi K, Ishii Y (1983) Expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spinal stenotic myelopathy. Spine 8(7):693–699

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 98(3):230–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu X, Min S, Zhang H, Zhou Z, Wang H, Jin A (2014) Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J 23(2):362–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Woods BI, Hohl J, Lee J, Donaldson W 3rd, Kang J (2011) Laminoplasty versus laminectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(3):688–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Wirbelsäulenzentrum, Klinik am Ring, Hohenstaufenring 28, 50674, Köln

    Dr. T. Koy

  2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln, Kerpenerstr. 62, 50937, Köln

    Dr. M.J. Scheyerer & Prof. Dr. P. Eysel

Authors
  1. Dr. T. Koy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. M.J. Scheyerer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Prof. Dr. P. Eysel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. DRK Schmerz-Zentrum Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland

    Hans-Raimund Casser

  2. Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Deutschland

    Monika Hasenbring

  3. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland

    Annette Becker

  4. Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Deutschland

    Ralf Baron

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koy, T., Scheyerer, M., Eysel, P. (2016). Operative und minimal-invasive Verfahren bei Rücken- und Nackenschmerz. In: Casser, HR., Hasenbring, M., Becker, A., Baron, R. (eds) Rückenschmerzen und Nackenschmerzen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29775-5_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29775-5_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29774-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29775-5

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation