Abstract
Although diagrams are considered effective tools for communication, students have been reported as lacking sufficient spontaneity in using diagrams when explaining what they have learned. This study examined the possible mechanism that relates text to diagram production in the process of providing written explanations. It puts forward the hypothesis that the production of text and diagrammatic representations shares the same cognitive processing resources, the allocation of which is influenced by individual factors like language ability and task-related factors like imageability of what needs to be explained. This hypothesis was tested on Japanese university students who were administered a passage (two versions varying in imageability) to read and subsequently explain in English or Japanese. A significant correlation was found between diagram use and English language competence (measured by TOEIC scores) - but only among students asked to explain the passage with lower imageability, and in English, providing support for the hypothesis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Larkin, J.H., Simon, H.A.: Why a Diagram is (Sometimes) Worth Ten Thousand Words. Cognitive Science 11, 65–99 (1987)
Ainsworth, S., Prain, V., Tytler, R.: Drawing to Learn in Science. Science 333, 1096–1097 (2011)
Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y.: Drawing Attention to Diagram Use. Science 334, 761 (2011)
Grawemeyer, B., Cox, R.: The Effect of Knowledge-of-External-Representations Upon Performance and Representational Choice in a Database Query Task. In: Blackwell, A., Marriott, K., Shimojima, A. (eds.) Diagrams 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2980, pp. 351–354. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E.: Active Comparison as a Means of Promoting the Development of Abstract Conditional Knowledge and Appropriate Choice of Diagrams in Math Word Problem Solving. In: Barker-Plummer, D., Cox, R., Swoboda, N. (eds.) Diagrams 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4045, pp. 181–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Bowen, G.M., Roth, W.-M.: Why Students Not Learn to Interpret Scientific Inscriptions. Research in Science Education 32, 303–327 (2002)
Dufour-Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., Belanger, M.: Pedagogical Considerations Concerning the Problem of Representation. In: Janvier, C. (ed.) Problems of Representation in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, pp. 110–120. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1987)
Kozhevnikov, M., Motes, M.A., Hegarty, M.: Spatial Visualization in Physics Problem Solving. Cognitive Science 31, 549–579 (2007)
Mokros, J.R., Tinker, R.F.: The Impact of Microcomputer-Based Labs on Children’s Ability to Interpret Graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 24, 369–383 (1987)
Ichikawa, S.: Suugakuteki na Kangaekata wo Megutte no Soudan to Sidou [Case Report of Cognitive Counseling in Mathematical Thinking]. In: Ichikawa, S. (ed.) Gakusyuu wo Sasaeru Nintikaunsering: Shinrigaku to Kyouiku no Aratana Setten [Cognitive Counseling that Supports Learning: A New Approach Bridging Psychology and Education], pp. 36–61. Brain Press, Tokyo (1993)
Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y.: Quantity and Quality of Diagrams Used in Math Word Problem Solving: A Comparison Between New Zealand and Japanese Students. Refereed Papers of the NZARE (New Zealand Association for Research in Education) National Conference 2006. NZARE, Wellington. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED518280 (2006)
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Ichikawa, S.: What Kinds of Perceptions and Daily Learning Behaviors Promote Students’ Use of Diagrams in Mathematics Problem Solving? Learning and Instruction 17, 322–335 (2007)
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Ichikawa, S.: The Effects of Perception of Efficacy and Diagram Construction Skills on Students’ Spontaneous Use of Diagrams When Solving Math Word Problems. In: Goel, A.K., Jamnik, M., Narayanan, N.H. (eds.) Diagrams 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6170, pp. 197–211. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y., Pérez-Kriz, S., Kato, M., Fukaya, T.: Science and Engineering Students’ Use of Diagrams During Note Taking Versus Explanation. Educational Studies (2012), doi:10.1080/03055698.2012.680577
Mayer, R.E.: Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2001)
Mayer, R.E., Anderson, R.B.: Animations Need Narrations: An Experimental Test of a Dual-Coding Hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology 83, 484–490 (1991)
Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: A Split-Attention Effect in Multimedia Learning: Evidence for Dual Processing Systems in Working Memory. Journal of Educational Psychology 90, 312–320 (1998)
Mayer, R.E., Sims, V.K.: For Whom is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Extensions of a Dual-Coding Theory of Multimedia Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology 84, 389–460 (1994)
Mayer, R.E., Moreno, R.: Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychologist 38, 43–52 (2003)
Baddeley, A.D.: Working Memory. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1986)
Baddeley, A.D.: Human Memory. Allyn & Bacon, Boston (1998)
Cornoldi, C., Gobbo, C., Mazzoni, G.: On Metamemory-Memory Relationship: Strategy Availability and Training. International Journal of Behavioral Development 14, 101–121 (1991)
Baddeley, A.D.: Personal communication, February 24 (2012)
Baddeley, A.D.: The Episodic Buffer: A New Component of Working Memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 417–423 (2000)
Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction. Cognition and Instruction 8, 293–332 (1991)
Sweller, J.: Instructional Design in Technical Areas. ACER Press, Camberwell (1999)
Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E.: Task-related Factors that Influence the Spontaneous Use of Diagrams in Math Word Problems. Applied Cognitive Psychology (2011), doi:10.1002/acp.1816
How CDs and DVDs Work, http://www.explainthatstuff.com/cdplayers.html
Chi, M.T.H., Siler, S.A., Jeong, H., Yamauchi, T., Hausmann, R.G.: Learning from Human Tutoring. Cognitive Science 25, 471–533 (2001)
TOEIC-ETS Home, http://www.ets.org/toeic
Ackerman, P.L.: Individual Differences in Information Processing: An Investigation of Intellectual Abilities and Task Performance During Practice. Intelligence 10, 101–139 (1986)
Neisser, U., Boodoo, G., Bouchard, T.J., Halpern, D.E., Loehlin, J.C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R.J., Urbina, S.: Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns. American Psychologist 51, 77–101 (1996)
Navon, D., Gopher, D.: On the Economy of the Human-Processing System. Psychological Review 86, 214–255 (1979)
Norman, D.A., Bobrow, D.J.: On Data-Limited and Resource-Limited Processes. Cognitive Psychology 7, 44–64 (1975)
Allport, G.W.: The Nature of Prejudice. Addison Wesley, New York (1954)
Kool, W., McGuire, J.T., Rosen, Z.B., Botvinick, M.M.: Decision Making and the Avoidance of Cognitive Demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 139, 665–682 (2010)
Mathews, N., Hunt, E., MacLeod, C.M.: Strategy Choice and Strategy Training in Sentence-Picture Verification. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 531–548 (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Manalo, E., Uesaka, Y. (2012). Elucidating the Mechanism of Spontaneous Diagram Use in Explanations: How Cognitive Processing of Text and Diagrammatic Representations Are Influenced by Individual and Task-Related Factors. In: Cox, P., Plimmer, B., Rodgers, P. (eds) Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Diagrams 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7352. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31223-6_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31222-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31223-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)