Abstract
We conducted a preliminary study to compare computerized measures of breast parenchymal pattern (BPP) on full field digital mammogram (FFDM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). A set of 123 subjects who had corresponding clinical FFDM of the same breast was collected from our DBT database. In a retroareolar region on the CC view, texture measures including run-length statistics (RLS), region-size statistics (RSS), and power spectrum were extracted from both modalities. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the similarities of the individual BPP measures between FFDM and DBT. It was found that the Pearson’s correlation coefficients for the individual BPP measures between the matched pairs of FFDM and DBT ranged from 0.02 to 0.61. Our results indicated that the BPP measures were different between FFDM and DBT in this limited data set.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2010 (2010), http://www.cancer.org
Kerlikowske, K.: The mammogram that cried wolfe. The New England Journal of Medicine 356, 297–300 (2007)
Boyd, N.F., Guo, H., Martin, L.J., Sun, L., Stone, J., Fishell, E., Jong, R.A., Hislop, G., Chiarelli, A., Minkin, S., Yaffe, M.J.: Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 356, 227–236 (2007)
Wei, J., Chan, H.-P., Wu, Y.-T., Zhou, C., Helvie, M.A., Tsodikov, A., Hadjiiski, L.M., Sahiner, B.: A pilot case-control study of the association of computerized mammographic parenchymal pattern (MPP) measure with breast cancer risk. Radiology 260, 42–49 (2011)
Niklason, L.T., Christian, B.T., Niklason, L.E., Kopans, D.B., Castleberry, D.E., Opsahl-Ong, B.H., Landberg, C.E., Slanetz, P.J., Giardino, A.A., Moore, R., Albagli, D., DeJule, M.C., Fitzgerald, F.C., Fobare, D.F., Giambattista, B.W., Kwasnick, R.F., Liu, J., Lubowski, S.J., Possin, G.E., Richotte, J.F., Wei, C.Y., Wirth, R.F.: Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. Radiology 205, 399–406 (1997)
Burgess, A.E.: On the noise variance of a digital mammography system. Medical Physics 31, 1987–1995 (2004)
Wu, Y.-T., Zhou, C., Chan, H.-P., Paramagul, C., Hadjiiski, L.M., Daly, C.P., Douglas, J.A., Zhang, Y., Sahiner, B., Shi, J., Wei, J.: Dynamic multiple thresholding breast boundary detection algorithm for mammograms. Medical Physics 37, 391–401 (2010)
Burgess, A.E., Jacobson, F.L., Judy, P.F.: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Medical Physics 28, 419–437 (2001)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wei, J., Chan, HP., Lu, Y., Hadjiiski, L., Zhou, C., Helvie, M.A. (2012). Breast Parenchymal Pattern (BPP) Analysis: Comparison of Digital Mammograms and Breast Tomosynthesis. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7361. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_66
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31271-7_66
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31270-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31271-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)