Abstract
The long-term goal of our research is to design information visualization systems that adapt to the specific needs, characteristics, and context of each individual viewer. In order to successfully perform such adaptation, it is crucial to first identify characteristics that influence an individual user’s effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction with a particular information visualization type. In this paper, we present a study that focuses on investigating the impact of four user characteristics (perceptual speed, verbal working memory, visual working memory, and user expertise) on the effectiveness of two common data visualization techniques: bar graphs and radar graphs. Our results show that certain user characteristics do in fact have a significant effect on task efficiency, user preference, and ease of use. We conclude with a discussion of how our findings could be effectively used for an adaptive visualization system.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Allen, B.: Individual differences and the conundrums of user-centered design: Two experiments. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51, 508–520 (2000)
Amar, R.A., Eagan, J., Stasko, J.T.: Low-Level Components of Analytic Activity in Information Visualization. In: 16th IEEE Visualization Conference, VIS 2005 (2005)
Baldonado, M.Q.W., Woodruff, A., Kuchinsky, A.: Guidelines for using multiple views in information visualization. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 110–119. ACM (2000)
Brusilovsky, P., Ahn, J., Dumitriu, T., Yudelson, M.: Adaptive Knowledge-Based Visualization for Accessing Educational Examples. In: Proceedings of Information Visualization (2006)
Chen, C.: Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 51(6), 529–542 (2000)
Cleveland, W.S., McGill, R.: Graphical Perception: Theory, Experimentation, and Application to the Development of Graphical Methods. Journal of the American Statistical Association 79(387), 531–554 (1984)
Conati, C., Maclaren, H.: Exploring the Role of Individual Differences in Information Visualization. In: Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI 2008), pp. 199–206. ACM, New York (2008)
Dillon, A.: Spatial-semantics: how users derive shape from information space. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 51(6), 521–528 (2000)
Ekstrom, R.B., French, J.W., Harman, H.H.: Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Educational Testing Service. Princeton, NJ (1976)
Few, S.: Keep Radar Graphs Below the Radar - Far Below: Information Management Magazine (2005)
Field, Hole: How to Design and Report Experiments, p. 153 (2003)
Fukuda, K., Vogel, E.K.: Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience (2009)
Goldberg, J.H., Helfman, J.I.: Comparing Information Graphics: A Critical Look at Eye Tracking. In: BELIV 2010 (2010)
Gotz, Wen: Behavior-Driven Visualization Recommendation. In: ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Sanibel, Florida (2009)
Green, T.M., Fisher, B.: Towards the personal equation of interaction: The impact of personality factors on visual analytics interface interaction. In: IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology, VAST (2010)
Jameson, A.: Adaptive Interfaces and Agents. In: Jacko, J.A., Sears, A. (eds.) Human-Computer Interface Handbook, pp. 305–330 (2003)
Kaptein, M.C., Nass, C., Markopoulos, P.: Powerful and Consistent Analysis of Likert-Type Rating Scales. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pp. 2391–2394 (2010)
Lewandowsky, S., Spence, I.: The perception of statistical graphs. Sociological Methods and Research 18, 200–242 (1989)
Nowell, L., Schulman, R., Hix, D.: Graphical encoding for information visualization: an empirical study. In: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, INFOVIS 2002, pp. 43–50 (2002)
Simkin, D., Hastie, R.: An Information-Processing Analysis of Graph Perception. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82(398), 454–465 (1987)
Turner, M.L., Engle, R.W.: Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory and Language 28(2), 127–154 (1989)
Velez, M.C., Silver, D., Tremaine, M.: Understanding visualization through spatial ability differences. In: Proceedings of Visualization 2005 (2005)
Williams, M., Munzner, T.: Steerable, Progressive Multidimensional Scaling. In: Proceedings of the InfoVis 2005, pp. 57–64 (2004)
Wobbrock, J., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., Higgins, J.: The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analyses Using Only ANOVA Procedures. In: CHI 2011. ACM Press (2011)
Ziemkiewicz, C., et al.: How Locus of Control Influences Compatibility with Visualization Style. In: Proc. IEEE VAST 2011 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Toker, D., Conati, C., Carenini, G., Haraty, M. (2012). Towards Adaptive Information Visualization: On the Influence of User Characteristics. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7379. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31454-4_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31453-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31454-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)