Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 5))

Abstract

The paper begins with an introduction of the Singularity Paradox, an observation that: “Superintelligent machines are feared to be too dumb to possess commonsense”. Ideas from leading researchers in the fields of philosophy, mathematics, economics, computer science and robotics regarding the ways to address said paradox are reviewed and evaluated. Suggestions are made regarding the best way to handle the Singularity Paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous, Hugo de Garis, Wikipedia.org (1999), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_de_Garis

  2. Anonymous, Tech Luminaries Address Singularity, IEEE Spectrum. Special Report: The Singularity (June 2008), http://spectrum.ieee.org/computing/hardware/tech-luminaries-address-singularity

  3. Armstrong, S.: Chaining God: A qualitative approach to AI, trust and moral systems. New European Century (2007), http://www.neweuropeancentury.org/GodAI.pdf

  4. Asimov, I.: Runaround in Astounding Science Fiction (March 1942)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bancel, P., Nelson, R.: The GCP Event Experiment: Design, Analytical Methods, Results. Journal of Scientific Exploration 22(4) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benford, G.: "Me/Days", in Alien Flesh. Victor Gollancz, London (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berglas, A.: Artificial Intelligence Will Kill Our Grandchildren (February 22, 2009), http://berglas.org/Articles/AIKillGrandchildren/AIKillGrandchildren.html

  8. Bishop, M.: Why Computers Can’t Feel Pain. Minds and Machines 19(4), 507–516 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Bostrom, N.: Ethical Issues in Advanced Artificial Intelligence. Review of Contemporary Philosophy 5, 66–73 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bostrom, N.: Oracle AI (2008), http://lesswrong.com/lw/qv/the_rhythm_of_disagreement/

  11. Bostrom, N., Yudkowsky, E.: The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. In: Ramsey, W., Frankish, K. (eds.) Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brin, D.: Lungfish (1987), http://www.davidbrin.com/lungfish1.html

  13. Bugaj, S., Goertzel, B.: Five Ethical Imperatives and their Implications for Human-AGI Interaction. Dynamical Psychology (2007), http://goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2007/Five_Ethical_Imperatives_svbedit.html

  14. Butler, S.: Darwin Among the Machines, To the Editor of Press, Christchurch, New Zealand, June 13 (1863)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chalmers, D.: The Singularity: A Philosophical Analysis. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17, 7–65 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dennett, D.C.: Why You Can’t Make a Computer That Feels Pain. Synthese 38(3), 415–456 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dietrich, E.: After the Humans are Gone. Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 19(1), 55–67 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Drexler, E.: Engines of Creation. Anchor Press (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fox, J., Shulman, C.: Superintelligence Does Not Imply Benevolence. In: 8th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy, Munich, Germany, October 4-6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Freeman, T.: Using Compassion and Respect to Motivate an Artificial Intelligence (2009), http://www.fungible.com/respect/paper.html

  21. Garis, H.D.: The Artilect War. ETC publications (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Geraci, R.M.: Apocalyptic AI: Religion and the Promise of Artificial Intelligence. The Journal of the American Academy of Religion 76(1), 138–166 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Geraci, R.M.: Religion for the Robots, Sightings. Martin Marty Center at the University of Chicago, June 14 (2007), http://divinity.uchicago.edu/martycenter/publications/~sightings/archive_2007/0614.shtml

  24. Geraci, R.M.: Spiritual Robots: Religion and Our Scientific View of the Natural World. Theology and Science 4(3), 229–246 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Gibson, W.: Neuromancer. Ace Science Fiction, New York (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goertzel, B.: The All-Seeing (A)I. Dynamic Psychology (2004), http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc

  27. Goertzel, B.: Apparent Limitations on the “AI Friendliness” and Related Concepts Imposed By the Complexity of the World (September 2006), http://www.goertzel.org/papers/LimitationsOnFriendliness.pdf

  28. Goertzel, B.: Encouraging a Positive Transcension. Dynamical Psychology (2004), http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc/2004/PositiveTranscension.html

  29. Goertzel, B.: Thoughts on AI Morality. Dynamical Psychology (2002), http://www.goertzel.org/dynapsyc

  30. Good, I.J.: Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine. Advances in Computers 6, 31–88 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gordon-Spears, D.: Assuring the behavior of adaptive agents. In: Rouff, C.A., et al. (eds.) Agent Technology From a Formal Perspective, pp. 227–259. Kluwer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gordon-Spears, D.F.: Asimov’s Laws: Current Progress. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A., Gordon-Spears, D.F. (eds.) FAABS 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2699, pp. 257–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Gordon, D.F.: Well-Behaved Borgs, Bolos, and Berserkers. In: 15th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1998), San Francisco, CA (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hall, J.S.: Ethics for Machines (2000), http://autogeny.org/ethics.html

  35. Hanson, R.: Economics of the Singularity. IEEE Spectrum 45(6), 45–50 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hanson, R.: Prefer Law to Values (October 10 , 2009), http://www.overcomingbias.com/2009/10/prefer-law-to-values.html

  37. Hawking, S.: Science in the Next Millennium. In: The Second Millennium Evening at The White House, Washington, DC, March 6 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hibbard, B.: Critique of the SIAI Collective Volition Theory (December 2005), http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/SIAI_CV_critique.html

  39. Hibbard, B.: Critique of the SIAI Guidelines on Friendly AI (2003), http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/SIAI_critique.html

  40. Hibbard, B.: The Ethics and Politics of Super-Intelligent Machines (July 2005), http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/~billh/g/SI_ethics_politics.doc

  41. Hibbard, B.: Super-Intelligent Machines. Computer Graphics 35(1), 11–13 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yudkowsky, E.S.: Three Major Singularity Schools, Singularity Institute Blog (September 2007), http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/schools

  43. Joy, B.: Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us. Wired Magazine 8(4) (April 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kaczynski, T.: Industrial Society and Its Future. The New York Times, September 19 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kurzweil, R.: The Singularity is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology. Viking (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Legg, S.: Friendly AI is Bunk, Vetta Project (2006), http://commonsenseatheism.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/

  47. Mccauley, L.: AI Armageddon and the Three Laws of Robotics. Ethics and Information Technology 9(2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nagel, T.: What is it Like to be a Bat? The Philosophical Review LXXXIII(4), 435–450 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Omohundro, S.M.: The Basic AI Drives. In: Wang, P., Goertzel, B., Franklin, S. (eds.) Proceedings of the First AGI Conference. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 171. IOS Press (February 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Omohundro, S.M.: The Nature of Self-Improving Artificial Intelligence, Singularity Summit, San Francisco, CA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pynadath, D.V., Tambe, M.: Revisiting Asimov’s First Law: A Response to the Call to Arms. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, p. 307. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  52. Sawyer, R.J.: Robot Ethics. Science 318, 1037 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Shulman, C., Jonsson, H., Tarleton, N.: Machine Ethics and Superintelligence. In: 5th Asia-Pacific Computing & Philosophy Conference, Tokyo, Japan, October 1-2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Shuman, C., Tarleton, N., Jonsson, H.: Which Consequentialism? Machine Ehics and Moral Divergence. In: Asia-Pacific Conference on Computing and Philosophy (APCAP 2009), Tokyo, Japan, October 1-2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Solomonoff, R.J.: The Time Scale of Artificial Intelligence: Reflections on Social Effects. North-Holland Human Systems Management 5, 149–153 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Sotala, K.: Evolved Altruism, Ethical Complexity, Anthropomorphic Trust. In: 7th European Conference on Computing and Philosophy (ECAP 2009), Barcelona, July 2-4 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  57. Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind 59(236), 433–460 (1950)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. Turing, A.M.: Intelligent Machinery, A Heretical Theory. Philosophia Mathematica 4(3), 256–260 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Turney, P.: Controlling Super-Intelligent Machines. Canadian Artif. Intell., 27 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Vinge, V.: The Coming Technological Singularity: How to Survive in the Post-human Era. In: Vision 21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace, Cleveland, OH, March 30-31, pp. 11–22 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  61. Warwick, K.: Cyborg Morals, Cyborg Values, Cyborg Ethics. Ethics and Information Technology 5, 131–137 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Waser, M.: Deriving a Safe Ethical Architecture for Intelligent Machines. In: 8th Conference on Computing and Philosophy (ECAP 2010), October 4-6 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Waser, M.R.: Designing a Safe Motivational System for Intelligent Machines. In: The Third Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, Lugano, Switzerland, March 5-8 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Waser, M.R.: Discovering the Foundations of a Universal System of Ethics as a Road to Safe Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Technical Report FS-08-04, Menlo Park, CA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Weld, D.S., Etzioni, O.: The First Law of Robotics (a Call to Arms). In: National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1042–1047 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Yampolskiy, R.V.: AI-Complete CAPTCHAs as Zero Knowledge Proofs of Access to an Artificially Intelligent System. ISRN Artificial Intelligence, 271878 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  67. Yampolskiy, R.V.: Artificial Intelligence Safety Engineering: Why Machine Ethics is a Wrong Approach. In: Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence (PT-AI 2011), Thessaloniki, Greece, October 3-4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  68. Yampolskiy, R.V.: Leakproofing Singularity - Artificial Intelligence Confinement Problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies (JCS), 19(1-2) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  69. Yudkowsky, E.: Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk. In: Bostrom, N., Cirkovic, M.M. (eds.) Global Catastrophic Risks, pp. 308–345. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Yudkowsky, E.: What is Friendly AI? (2005), http://singinst.org/ourresearch/publications/what-is-friendly-ai.html

  71. Yudkowsky, E.S.: The AI-Box Experiment (2002), http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/aibox

  72. Yudkowsky, E.S.: Coherent Extrapolated Volition, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence (May 2004), http://singinst.org/upload/CEV.html

  73. Yudkowsky, E.S.: Creating Friendly AI - The Analysis and Design of Benevolent Goal Architectures (2001), http://singinst.org/upload/CFAI.html

  74. Yudkowsky, E.S.: General Intelligence and Seed AI (2001), http://singinst.org/ourresearch/publications/GISAI/

  75. Yudkowsky, E.S.: Three Major Singularity Schools, Singularity Institute Blog (September 2007), http://yudkowsky.net/singularity/schools

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roman V. Yampolskiy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag GmbH Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yampolskiy, R.V. (2013). What to Do with the Singularity Paradox?. In: Müller, V. (eds) Philosophy and Theory of Artificial Intelligence. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 5. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31674-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31673-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31674-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics