Abstract
Economic growth has conventionally been modelled for space-less economies. Econometrically, growth models have mostly been estimated on time series of national economies with minimal distinctions between economies as large as Japan or the USA and as small as the smallest economies of Asia and Europe. This approach to the analysis of economic growth is especially dangerous when the impact of scientific and technological knowledge is important for the process of growth. Creative activities and the formation of knowledge are highly clustered in space. Thus, the spatial distribution of accessibility to knowledge capital and investments determines economic growth of nations and other spatial aggregates.
The Haavelmo paradox contrasts chaos as the generic property of non-linear dynamic models with the fact that most statistics on macroeconomic growth processes tend towards persistent constant positive rates of growth. The paradox can be resolved if the non-linear dynamic model is subdivided into fast, private variables and very slow, public variables. Modelling spatial accessibility of knowledge as a slow, public variable and machinery and similar material capital as a relatively faster, private variable ensures stable growth, at least in the short and medium terms of the economic growth processes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andersson ÅE, Beckmann MB (2009) Economics of knowledge – theory, models and measurements. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham/Northampton
Braconier H (1998) Essays on R&D and growth, vol 72, Lund economic studies. Department of Economics, Lund University, Lund
Braudel F (1982) The wheels of commerce civilization and capitalism 15th–18th century, vol II. Harper and Row, New York
Denison EF (1967) Why growth rates differ. The Brookings Institution, Washington
Domar ED (1957) Essays in the theory of economic growth. Oxford University Press, New York
Haken H (1978) Synergetics: an introduction. Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics chemistry and biology. Springer, Berlin
Haken H (1982) Synergetics: an introduction. Nonequilibrium phase transitions and self-organization in physics chemistry and biology. Springer, Berlin
Harrod RF (1939) An essay in dynamic theory. Econ J 49:14–33
Heckscher EF (1955) Mercantilism, 2 vols. Allen and Unwin, London
Kuznets S (1966) Modern economic growth: rate, structure and spread. Yale University Press, New Haven
Leontief WW (1951) Studies in the structure of the American economy 1919–1939. Oxford University Press, New York
Maddison A (1982) Phases of capitalist development. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Maddison A (1995) Monitoring the world economy: 1820–1992. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris
Morishima M (1982) Why has Japan succeeded? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Nikaido H (1968) Convex structures and economic theory. Academic, New York
North D (1991) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Pirenne H (1939) Medieval cities: their origins and the revival of trade. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Puu T (1997) Nonlinear economic dynamics, 4th edn. Springer, Berlin
Romer PM (1986a) Increasing returns and long-run growth. J Pol Econ 94:1002–1037
Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Pol Econ 98:71–102
Rosser JB Jr (2008) Dynamic discontinuities in ecologic-economic systems. In: Allen CR, Holling CS (eds) Discontinuity theory in ecosystems and other complex systems. Columbia University Press, New York
Schumpeter JA (1912) Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Duncker und Humblot, Berlin
Shell K (1966) Toward a theory of inventive activity and capital accumulation. Am Econ Rev 56(2):62–68
Smith A (1776, 2001) An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Edinburgh (1776), edited and prefaced by Dr. Eamonn Butler. The Adam Smith Institute, London
Solow RM (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Quart J Econ 70:65–94
Sugakov VI (1998) Lectures in synergetics. World Scientific, Singapore
Swan W (1956) Economic growth and capital accumulation. Econ Record 32:334–361
Uzawa H (1965) Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth. Int Econ Rev 6:18–31
von Neumann (1935–1936, 1937, 1945) Uber ein ökonomisches Gleichungssystem und eine Verallgemeinerung des Brouwerschen Fixpunktsatzes. In: Ergebnisse eines Mathematischen Kolloquiums, 8, 1935–1936. Franz–Deuticke, pp. 73–83. (Translated: A model of general economic equilibrium. Rev Econ Stud 13:1–9, 1945)
von Thünen J-H (1875) Der isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landwirtschaft und Nationaloekonomie. Wiegandt, Hempel & Parey, Berlin
Weber M (1930) The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Allen and Unwin, London
Wicksell K (1901) Föreläsningar i nationalekonomi, första delen: Teoretisk nationalekonomi, Lund. Translated as lectures on political economy. vol 1. General theory. Routledge, London (1935). Reprint (1978), Kelley, New York
Zhang W-B (1991) Synergetic economics: time and change in non-linear economics. Springer Verlag, New York/Berlin
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Andersson, Å.E. (2013). Knowledge Accessibility, Economic Growth and the Haavelmo Paradox. In: Klaesson, J., Johansson, B., Karlsson, C. (eds) Metropolitan Regions. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32141-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32141-2_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32140-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32141-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)