Skip to main content

Intentional Fragments: Bridging the Gap between Organizational and Intentional Levels in Business Processes

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012 (OTM 2012)

Abstract

Business process models provide a natural way to describe real-world processes to be supported by software-intensive systems. These models can be used to analyze processes in the system-as-is and describe potential improvements for the system-to-be. There is however little support to analyze how well a given business process models satisfies its business goals. Our objective is to address these problems by relating business process models to goal models so that goal-oriented requirements engineering techniques can be used to analyze how well the business processes for the system-as-is satisfy the business goals. The paper establishes relationships between BPMN 2.0 and the KAOS goal-oriented requirements modelling framework. We present the notion of intentional fragment to bridge the gap between process models and goal models. We conducted an evaluation to analyze use of this concept in the context of a university process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hepp, M., Roman, D.: An ontology framework for semantic business process management. In: Proceedings of Wirtschaftsinformatik 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. de la Vara, J.L., Sánchez, J., Pastor, Ó.: Business Process Modelling and Purpose Analysis for Requirements Analysis of Information Systems. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 213–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. OMG: Business process model and notation (bpmn 2.0) (2011), http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/

  5. Recker, J.: Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with bpmn. Business Process Management Journal 16(1), 181–201 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Pavlovski, C., Zou, J.: Non-functional requirements in business process modeling. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling, vol. 79, pp. 103–112. Australian Computer Society, Inc. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lapouchnian, A., Yu, Y., Mylopoulos, J.: Requirements-Driven Design and Configuration Management of Business Processes. In: Alonso, G., Dadam, P., Rosemann, M. (eds.) BPM 2007. LNCS, vol. 4714, pp. 246–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cardoso, E., Guizzardi, R., Almeida, J.: Aligning goal analysis and business process modelling: a case study in healthcare. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 5(2), 144–158 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Koliadis, G., Ghose, A.K.: Relating Business Process Models to Goal-Oriented Requirements Models in KAOS. In: Hoffmann, A., Kang, B.-H., Richards, D., Tsumoto, S. (eds.) PKAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4303, pp. 25–39. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Lamsweerde, A.: Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour. In: Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, pp. 249–262. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Letier, E., Van Lamsweerde, A.: Reasoning about partial goal satisfaction for requirements and design engineering. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 29, 53–62 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Lamsweerde, A., Letier, E.: Handling obstacles in goal-oriented requirements engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 26(10), 978–1005 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Anaya, V., Berio, G., Harzallah, M., Heymans, P., Matulevicius, R., Opdahl, A., Panetto, H., Verdecho, M.: The unified enterprise modelling language–overview and further work. Computers in Industry 61(2), 99–111 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cabanillas, C., Resinas, M., Ruiz-Cortés, A.: Defining and Analysing Resource Assignments in Business Processes with RAL. In: Kappel, G., Maamar, Z., Motahari-Nezhad, H.R. (eds.) ICSOC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7084, pp. 477–486. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Lidl, R., Pilz, G.: Applied abstract algebra. Springer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. OASIS: Web services business process execution language v2.0 (2007), http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=wsbpel

  17. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., Ouyang, C.: Semantics and analysis of business process models in bpmn. Information and Software Technology 50(12), 1281–1294 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Prandi, D., Quaglia, P., Zannone, N.: Formal Analysis of BPMN Via a Translation into COWS. In: Lea, D., Zavattaro, G. (eds.) COORDINATION 2008. LNCS, vol. 5052, pp. 249–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Soffer, P., Wand, Y.: Goal-Driven Analysis of Process Model Validity. In: Persson, A., Stirna, J. (eds.) CAiSE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3084, pp. 521–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Magee, J., Kramer, J.: State models and java programs. Wiley (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Letier, E., Kramer, J., Magee, J., Uchitel, S.: Deriving event-based transition systems from goal-oriented requirements models. Automated Software Engineering 15(2), 175–206 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hindus, D., Mainwaring, S., Leduc, N., Hagström, A., Bayley, O.: Casablanca: designing social communication devices for the home. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 325–332. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Simiand, F.: Méthode historique et science sociale. Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 15, 83–119 (1960)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bruseberg, A., McDonagh-Philp, D.: Focus groups to support the industrial/product designer: a review based on current literature and designers’ feedback. Applied Ergonomics 33, 27–38 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Morrison, E., Ghose, A., Dam, H., Hinge, K., Hoesch-Klohe, K.: Strategic alignment of business processes (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ouyang, C., Dumas, M., Ter Hofstede, A., Van Der Aalst, W.: Pattern-based translation of bpmn process models to bpel web services. International Journal of Web Services Research (JWSR) 5(1), 42–62 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Eberle, H., Leymann, F., Schleicher, D., Schumm, D., Unger, T.: Process fragment composition operations. In: 2010 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference (APSCC), pp. 157–163. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weber, B., Reichert, M., Rinderle-Ma, S.: Change patterns and change support features–enhancing flexibility in process-aware information systems. Data & Knowledge Engineering 66(3), 438–466 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Cappelli, C., Leite, J., Batista, T., Silva, L.: An aspect-oriented approach to business process modeling. In: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Early Aspects, pp. 7–12. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mehandjiev, N., Grefen, P.: Dynamic business process formation for instant virtual enterprises. Springer-Verlag New York Inc. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cortes-Cornax, M., Matei, A., Letier, E., Dupuy-Chessa, S., Rieu, D. (2012). Intentional Fragments: Bridging the Gap between Organizational and Intentional Levels in Business Processes. In: Meersman, R., et al. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2012. OTM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7565. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33606-5_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33605-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33606-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics