Abstract
In this article we discuss whether robots need "interiority" in order to competently participate in emotional and empathic dynamics with human partners. We draw on original research on emotions, mind, neurophysiological mechanisms of social interaction and HRI to contest the common sense thesis according to which robots without "interiority" can only simulate emotions and empathy, to the extent that the affective (emotional and empathic) relationships between them and humans would not be authentic. The main thesis of our article is that empathic social robots do not need “interiority”, but the ability of dynamical coordination with their social partners and the surrounding environment(s), since this ability (and not “interiority”) is at the basis of human cognitive and affective (emotional and empathic) activity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Campe, R., Weber, J. (eds.): Rethinking Emotions: Interiority and Exteriority in Premodern, Modern and Contemporary Thought. Walter de Gruyter, New York (forthcoming, 2013)
Turkle, S.: Alone Together. Basic Books, New York (2010)
Feil-Seifer, D.J., Matarić, M.J.: Ethical Principles for Socially Assistive Robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Special Issue on Roboethics 18(1), 24–31 (2011)
Arbib, R.: Beware of the Passionate Robot. In: Fellous, J.-M., Arbib, M. (eds.) Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot, pp. 333–383. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Ziemke, T.: On the role of emotion in biological and robotic autonomy. Biosystems 91, 401–408 (2008)
Barandiaran, X., Moreno, A.: On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive. A minimally cognitive organization program. Journal of Adaptive Behavior 14(2), 171–185 (2006)
Ziemke, T., Lowe, R.: On the Role of Emotion in Embodied Cognitive Architectures: From Organisms to Robots. Cogn. Comput. 1, 104–117 (2009)
Adolphs, R.: Can a Robot Have Emotions? In: Fellous, J.-M., Arbib, M. (eds.) Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot, pp. 9–25. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)
Dumouchel, P.: Émotions. Institut Synthélabo, Paris (1995)
Dumouchel, P.: Social Emotions. In: Cańamero, L., Aylett, R. (eds.) Animating Expressive Characters for Social Interaction, pp. 1–20. John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia (2008)
James, W.: What is an Emotion? Mind 9, 188–205 (1884)
Gallese, V.: Intentional Attunement. The Mirror Neuron System and its role in interpersonal relations. Interdisciplines (2005), http://www.interdisciplines.org/mirror/papers/1
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 661–670 (2001)
Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L.: The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004)
Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.C., Mazziotta, J.C., Lenzi, G.L.: Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5497–5502 (2001)
Singer, T.: The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 6, 855–863 (2006)
Saarela, M.V., Hlushchuk, Y., Williams, A.C., Schurmann, M., Kalso, E., Hari, R.: The Compassionate Brain: Humans Detect Intensity of Pain from Another’s Face. Cerebral Cortex (2006)
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., Rizzolatti, G.: A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(9), 396–403 (2004)
Decety, J., Chaminade, T., Grézes, J., Meltoff, A.N.: A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage 15, 265–272 (2002)
Clark, A.: Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)
Damiano, L.: Unità in dialogo. Mondadori, Milano (2009)
Varela, F.: Steps to a science of Interbeing: unfolding the Dharma implicit in modern cognitive science. In: Bachelor, S., Claxton, G., Watson, G. (eds.) The Psychology of Awakening, pp. 71–89. Rider/Random House, New York (1999)
Clark, A., Chalmers, D.J.: The extended mind. Analysis 58, 10–23 (1998)
Thompson, E., Varela, F.: Radical embodiment. Trends in Cognitive Science 5(10), 418–425
Damiano, L.: Creative coordinations. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution 65(8), 1556–1884, 568–575 (2009)
Broz, F., Lehmann, H.: Automated Analysis of Mutual Gaze in Human Conversational Pairs. In: Nakano, Y., Conati, C., Bader, T. (eds.) Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. Springer (2012)
Fitzpatrick, P., Metta, G., Natale, L., Rao, S., Sadini, G.: Learning About Objects Through Action. Initial Steps Towards Artificial Cognition. In: Proceedings of Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2003 (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Damiano, L., Dumouchel, P., Lehmann, H. (2012). Should Empathic Social Robots Have Interiority?. In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, JJ., Simmons, R., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7621. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34102-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34103-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)