Skip to main content

Rival-Penalized Competitive Clustering: A Study and Comparison

  • Chapter
Neural Nets and Surroundings

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 19))

  • 1437 Accesses

Abstract

A major recurring problem in exploratory phases of data mining is the task of finding the number of clusters in a dataset. In this paper we illustrate a variant of the competitive clustering method which introduces a rival penalization mechanism, and show how it can be used to solve such problem. Additionally, we present some tests aimed at comparing the performance of our rival-penalized technique with other classical procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Forgy, E.W.: Cluster analysis of multivariate data: efficiency vs interpretability of classifications. Biometrics 21, 768–769 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Xu, R., Wunsch, D.: Survey of Clustering Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 16, 645–678 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sugar, C.A., James, G.M.: Finding the number of clusters in a dataset: an information theoretic approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association 98, 750–763 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Martinetz, T.M., Berkovich, S.G., Schulten, K.J.: “Neural Gas” network for vector quantization and its application to time-series prediction. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 4, 558–569 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Budura, G., Botoca, C., Miclău, N.: Competitive Learning Algorithms for Data Clustering. Electronics and Energetics 19, 261–269 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kohonen, T.: Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps. Biological Cybernetics 43, 59–69 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Erwin, E., Obermayer, A., Schulten, K.: Self-organizing maps: ordering, convergence, properties and energy functions. Biological Cybernetics 67, 47–55 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Bezdek, J.C., Pal, N.R.: Some new indexes of cluster validity. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 28, 301–315 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bienenstock, E.L., Cooper, L.N., Munro, P.W.: Neuroscience 2, 32–48 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C., Vecchi, M.: Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science 220, 671–680 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ferrari, S., Ferrigno, G., Piuri, V., Borghese, N.A.: Reducing and Filtering Point Clouds with Enhanced Vector Quantization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks 18, 161–177 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Uchiyama, T., Arbib, M.A.: An algorithm for competitive learning in clustering problems. Pattern Recognition 27, 1415–1421 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fritzke, B.: A growing Neural Gas network learns topologies. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 7, 625–632 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bezdek, J.: Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, New York (1981)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. King, I., Lau, T.-K.: Non-hierarchical Clustering with Rival Penalized Competitive Learning for Information Retrieval. In: Perner, P., Petrou, M. (eds.) MLDM 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1715, pp. 116–130. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Bação, F., Lobo, V., Painho, M.: Self-organizing Maps as Substitutes for K-Means Clustering. In: Sunderam, V.S., van Albada, G.D., Sloot, P.M.A., Dongarra, J. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3516, pp. 476–483. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Borghese .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borghese, A., Capraro, W. (2013). Rival-Penalized Competitive Clustering: A Study and Comparison. In: Apolloni, B., Bassis, S., Esposito, A., Morabito, F. (eds) Neural Nets and Surroundings. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 19. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35467-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35467-0_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35466-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35467-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics