Skip to main content

Contextual Natural Deduction

  • Conference paper
Logical Foundations of Computer Science (LFCS 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7734))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper defines the contextual natural deduction calculus \(\textbf{ND}^\textbf{c}\) for the implicational fragment of intuitionistic logic. \(\textbf{ND}^\textbf{c}\) extends the usual natural deduction calculus (here called \(\textbf{ND}\)) by allowing the implication introduction and elimination rules to operate on formulas that occur inside contexts. In analogy to the Curry-Howard isomorphism between \(\textbf{ND}\) and the simply-typed λ-calculus, an extension of the λ-calculus, here called λ c-calculus, is defined in order to provide compact proof-terms for \(\textbf{ND}^\textbf{c}\) proofs. Soundness and completeness of \(\textbf{ND}^\textbf{c}\) with respect to \(\textbf{ND}\) are proven by defining translations of proofs between these calculi. Furthermore, some \(\textbf{ND}^\textbf{c}\)-proofs are shown to be quadratically smaller than the smallest \(\textbf{ND}\)-proofs of the same theorems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term rewriting and all that. Cambridge University Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Böhme, S., Nipkow, T.: Sledgehammer: Judgement Day. In: Giesl, J., Hähnle, R. (eds.) IJCAR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6173, pp. 107–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brünnler, K.: Atomic Cut Elimination for Classical Logic. In: Baaz, M., Makowsky, J.A. (eds.) CSL 2003. LNCS, vol. 2803, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Brünnler, K., McKinley, R.: An Algorithmic Interpretation of a Deep Inference System. In: Cervesato, I., Veith, H., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5330, pp. 482–496. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bruscoli, P., Guglielmi, A.: On the proof complexity of deep inference. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 10, 1–34 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Bruscoli, P., Guglielmi, A., Gundersen, T., Parigot, M.: A Quasipolynomial Cut-Elimination Procedure in Deep Inference via Atomic Flows and Threshold Formulae. In: Clarke, E.M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-16 2010. LNCS, vol. 6355, pp. 136–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. de Groote, P. (ed.): The Curry-Howard Isomorphism. Cahiers du Centre de Logique, vol. 8. Academia, Universite Catholique de Louvain (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Deharbe, D., Fontaine, P., Paleo, B.W.: Quantifier inference rules in the proof format of verit. In: 1st International Workshop on Proof Exchange for Theorem Proving (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dershowitz, N.: On Lazy Commutation. In: Grumberg, O., Kaminski, M., Katz, S., Wintner, S. (eds.) Languages: From Formal to Natural. LNCS, vol. 5533, pp. 59–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 39, 176–210, 405–431 (1934-1935)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Guenot, N.: Nested proof search as reduction in the lambda-calculus. In: Schneider-Kamp, P., Hanus, M. (eds.) PPDP, pp. 183–194. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guglielmi, A.: A system of interaction and structure. CoRR, cs.LO/9910023 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hetzl, S., Leitsch, A., Weller, D.: Towards Algorithmic Cut-Introduction. In: Bjørner, N., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-18 2012. LNCS, vol. 7180, pp. 228–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Mayr, R., Nipkow, T.: Higher-order rewrite systems and their confluence. Theor. Comput. Sci. 192(1), 3–29 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Parigot, M.: λμ-Calculus: An Algorithmic Interpretation of Classical Natural Deduction. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) LPAR 1992. LNCS, vol. 624, pp. 190–201. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Tiu, A.F.: A Local System for Intuitionistic Logic. In: Hermann, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4246, pp. 242–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Woltzenlogel Paleo, B.: Atomic Cut Introduction by Resolution: Proof Structuring and Compression. In: Clarke, E.M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR-16 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6355, pp. 463–480. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Woltzenlogel Paleo, B. (2013). Contextual Natural Deduction. In: Artemov, S., Nerode, A. (eds) Logical Foundations of Computer Science. LFCS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7734. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35722-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35722-0_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35721-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35722-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics